Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

After reviewing the controversy over inclusion of grammatical instruction in composition and communication courses, this article details a data-based study that explored the relationship between grammatical proficiency and a number of variables in an introductory business-communication course. Em pirical data suggest a small, but significant correlation between grammatical proficiency and success in writing the formal report. The data suggest that a stronger correlation exists between grammatical proficiency and perform ance in the overall course, and that grammatical competency is a predictor of successful completion of the course. The article explores other minor correla tions, suggests the implications these correlations have for business- communication courses, and recommends other areas of study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Corder, Jim W. "Outhouses, Weather Changes, and the Return to Basics in English Education ." College English 38.5 (1977): 474-82.

Cowan, Elizabeth Wooten. "Fractions Make My Head Hurt." College English 38.5 ( 1977): 460-65.

Daugherty, Leo. "The English Grapholect and the Introductory Composition Class." College Composition and Communication 30.2 (1979): 134-40.

David, Carol. "Report on Standards for a Business Communication Composition Course: Results of a Survey." TheABCABulletin 45.1 (1982): 21-29.

Dodge, Kirsten. "The Writing Morass: Redefining the Problem." The Journal of Business Communication 17.4 (1980): 19-32.

Farrell, Thomas J. "Literacy, the Basics, and All that Jazz." College English 38.5 (1977): 443-59.

Gibson, David V. , and Barbara E. Mendleson . "Redundancy." The Journal of Business Communication 21.1 (1984): 43-62.

Hairston, Maxine. "Not all Errors are Created Equal." College English 43.8 (1981): 794-806.

Hartwell, Patrick. "Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar." College English 47.2 (1985): 105-27.

10.

Herrick, Michael J. "A Survey of Grammar in Business Communication." The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication 49.4 (1986): 9-13.

11.

Smith, Allen N. "No One Has a Right to His Own Language." College Composition and Communication 27.2 (1976): 155-59.

12.

Soldow, Gary E "A Study of the Linguistic Dimension of Information Processing as a Function of Cognitive Complexity." The Journal of Business Communication 19.1 (1982): 55-69.

13.

Students' Right to Their Own Language. Spec. issue of College Composition and Communication 30.1 (1972).

14.

Tesch, Robert C. "An Analysis of Three Instructional Strategies Used in Teaching Business Communication Grammar and Usage." The Journal of Business Communication 17.1 (1979): 53-59.

15.

Waltman, John L. "Entropy and Business Communication." The Journal of Business Communication 21.1 (1984): 63-80.

16.

White, Kathryn , and Betty S. Johnson . "Evaluation Criteria Used in Business Communication Courses Taught in Colleges of Business Affiliated with AACSB." The ABCA Bulletin 47.3 (1984): 39-42.

17.

Wilkinson, C.W. "Grammar, Theory, and Principles in the Basic College Course (What? Whether? How Much?)." The ABCA Bulletin 40.3 (1977): 1-4.

Do Good Grammar Skills Predict Success in a Business-Communication Course?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References