This article brings social analysis to bear on technical and professional writ
ing by examining the differing conditions of professionalism in the fields of
science, engineering, and, peripherally, law. The article posits a relationship
between the social and political conditions of a field, and the conventions of
language use in certain fields. The writing ofscience is used as an example to
illustrate such a semiotic relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahamson, Mark.The Professional in the Organization. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.
2.
Barnes, S.B.Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
3.
Becker H., and H. Carper. "The Development of Identification with an Occupation." American Journal of Sociology61.4 (1956): 289-98.
4.
Bormann, Ernest. "Symbolic Convergence: Organizational Communication and Culture." Communication and Organizations: An Interpretive Approach. Ed. Linda Putnam and Michael Pacanowsky.Beverly Hills: Sage , 1983. 99-122.
5.
Day, Robert.How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Philadelphia : ISI Press, 1979.
6.
Deal, Terrence, and Allen Kennedy.Corporate Cultures. Reading: Addison Wesley, 1982.
7.
Dingwall, Robert, and Philip Lewis, eds. The Sociology of the Professions. New York: St. Martins, 1983.
8.
Etzioni, Amitai, ed. The Semi-Professions and Their Organizations. New York: Free Press, 1969.
9.
Freidson, Eliot.Profession of Medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead, and Co., 1970.
10.
Gerstl, Joel, and G. Jacobs , eds. Professions for the People: The Politics of Skill . Cambridge: Shenkman, 1976.
11.
Gilbert, Nigel, and Michael Mulkay. "Contexts of Scientific Discourse: Social Accounting in Experimental Papers." The Social Process of Scientific Investigation . Ed. Karin Knorr Cetina, et al. Boston: Reidel Publishing Company, 1980. 269-94.
12.
Goldner, Fred H., and R.R. Ritti. "Professionalization as Career Immobility." American Journal of Sociology72.5 (1967): 489-502.
13.
Goode, William. "Community Within a Community: The Professions." American Sociological Review22.2 (1957): 194-200.
14.
Greenwood, Ernest. "Attributes of a Profession." Social Work2.3 ( 1957): 45-55.
15.
Gross, Alan. "Form ofthe Experimental Paper: A Realization of the Myth of Induction ." Journal of Technical Writing and Communication15.1 ( 1985): 15-26.
16.
Halliday, M.A.K. Language as SocialSemiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: University Park Press, 1978 .
17.
Haskell, Thomas, ed. The Authority of Experts . Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.
18.
Hudson, Kenneth.Jargon of the Professions. London: Macmillan Press, 1979.
19.
Jagtenberg, Tom.The Social Construction ofScience. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983.
20.
Johnson, Terence.Professions and Power. London: Macmillan Press, 1972.
21.
Knorr Cetina, Karin.The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
22.
Knorr Cetina, Karin, et al., eds. The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Sociology of the Sciences IV. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co., 1980. 269-94.
23.
Kornhauser, William.Scientists in Industry. Berkeley: U California P,1962.
24.
Kuhn, Thomas. "Postscript, 2nd ed." The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: U Chicago P, 1970. 174-210.
25.
Larson, Magali.The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: U California P, 1977.
26.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar.Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.
27.
Layton, Edwin.The Revolt of the Engineers. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve UP, 1971.
28.
Lieberman, Jethro.The Tyranny of the Experts: How the Professionals and Experts are Closing the Open Society. New York: Walker , 1970.
29.
Medawar, P. "Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent?" Saturday Review 1 August 1964: 42-43.
30.
Merton, Robert.Social Research and the Practicing Professions. Cambridge : Abt Books, 1982.
31.
Mitroff, Ian.The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1974.
32.
Mulkay, Michael.Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: George Allen, 1979.
33.
Noble, David.America by Design. New York: Knopf , 1977.
34.
Pacanowsky, Michael, and NickO'Donnell Trujillo. "Organizational Communication as Cultural Performance." Communication Monographs50.2 (1983): 126-47.
35.
Perucci, Robert. "Engineering: Professional Servant of Power." The Professions and Their Prospects. Ed. Eliot Freidson. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1973. 119-33.
36.
, and Joel Gerstl.Profession Without Community: Engineers in American Society. New York: Random House, 1969.
Reiss, Albert. "Occupational Mobility of Professional Workers." American Sociological Review20.6 (1955): 693-700.
39.
Ritti, Richard.The Engineer in the Industrial Corporation. New York: Columbia UP, 1971.
40.
Ritzer, George.Man and His Work: Conflict and Change. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1972.
41.
Rogers, G.The Nature of Engineering. London: Macmillan Press, 1983.
42.
Russell, Colin.Science and Social Change, 1700-1900. London: Macmillan Press, 1983.
43.
Silverman, David. "The Action Frame of Reference." Colleagues in Organizations: The Social Construction of Professional Work. Ed. Ralph Blankenship. Huntington: Robert Krieger, 1980 . 54-73.
44.
. " Speaking Seriously: Part II." Theory and Society1.3 (1974): 341-59.
