ArizaM. A. (2024, June 18). Miami is entering a state of unreality. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/06/miami-climate-change-floods/678718/
BrizeeA. (2015). Using isocrates to teach technical communication and civic engagement. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(2), 134–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615569481
6.
CushmanE. (1996). The rhetorician as an agent of social change. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/358271
7.
DubinskyJ. M. (2002). Service-learning as a path to virtue: The ideal orator in professional communication. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8(2), 61–74.
8.
DubinskyJ. (2004). The status of service in learning. In BridgefordT.KitalongK. S.SelfeR. (Eds.), Innovative approaches to the teaching of technical communication (pp. 15–30). Utah State University Press.
9.
DubinskyJ. M. (2010). The land-grant way: Connected knowing and the call of service. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 1(1), 1–9.
FisherW. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180
12.
FisherW. R. (1987). Technical logic, rhetorical logic, and narrative rationality. Argumentation, 1(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127116
ItchuaqiyaqC. U. (2023). When the sound is frozen: Extracting climate data from Innuit narratives. In S. Williams (Ed.), Technical communication for environmental action (pp. 19–38). Routledge.
16.
KahneJ.WestheimerJ. (1996). In the service of what? The politics of service learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(9), 592–599.
PungowiyiC. L. (2001). December 2, 2001, lecture about climate change at University of Alaska Fairbanks. https://jukebox.uaf.edu/site7/interviews/3551
19.
RossD. G.OppergaardB.WillertonR. (2019). Principles of place: Developing a place-based ethic for discussing, debating, and anticipating technical communication concerns. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2867179