Academic work increasingly involves creating digital tools with interdisciplinary teams distributed across institutions and roles. The negative impacts of distributed work are described at length in technical communication scholarship, but such impacts have not yet been realized in collaborative practices. By integrating attention to their core ethical principles, best practices, and work patterns, the authors are developing an ethical, sustainable approach to team building that they call constructive distributed work. This article describes their integrated approach, documents the best practices that guide their research team, and models the three-dimensional thinking that helps them develop sustainable digital tools and ensure the consistent professional development of all team members.
AndersA. (2016). Team communication platforms and emergent social collaboration practices. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 224–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415627273
2.
BanatH.McMullinM.DilgerB. (2020). Initiating and sustaining student professionalization through grant writing. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication–SIGDOC '20 (Article 2, pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380851.3416737
3.
BatovaT. (2018). Work motivation in the rhetoric of component content management. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(3), 308–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918762030
4.
BjørnP.SøderbergA.-M.KrishnaS. (2019). Translocality in global software development: The dark side of global agile. Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2), 174–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1398092
CardonP. W. (2016). Community, culture, and affordances in social collaboration and communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416635892
CushmanE. (2002). Sustainable service learning programs. College Composition and Communication, 54(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1512101
9.
CushmanE.GreenE. (2010). Knowledge work with the Cherokee nation: The pedagogy of engaging publics in a praxis of new media. In AckermanJ.CooganD. (Eds.), The public work of rhetoric: Citizen scholars and civic engagement (pp. 175–192). University of South Carolina Press.
10.
DivineD.ZachryM. (2018). Project management, contradictions, and textualized activity: Supporting reflection in project based organizations. Technical Communication, 65(2), 194–209.
11.
FarisM. J.MooreK. R. (2017). Emerging scholars and social media use: A pilot study of risk. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 4(2), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3068698.3068703
12.
FerroT.ZachryM. (2014). Technical communication unbound: Knowledge work, social media, and emergent communicative practices. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2014.850843
13.
FlowerL. (2008). Community literacy and the rhetoric of public engagement. Southern Illinois University Press.
FullmerM. (2018, February 26). Crow technical workshop: Think like a (wise) programmer [Google Slides presentation]. Corpus & Repository of Writing (Crow).
16.
GallowayA. R. (2006). Protocol: How control exists after decentralization. MIT Press.
GrahamS. S.KimS.-Y.DeVastoD. M.KeithW. (2015). Statistical genre analysis: Toward big data methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 70–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975955
19.
Hart-DavidsonW.GrabillJ. (2011). Understanding and supporting knowledge work in schools, workplaces and public life. In Starke-MeyerringD.ParéA.ArtemevaN.HorneM.YousoubovaL. (Eds.), Writing knowledge in societies (pp. 161–179). WAC Clearinghouse. https://clearinghouse.colostate.edu/books/winks/chapter8.pdf
20.
Hart-DavidsonW.ZachryM.SpinuzziC. (2012). Activity streams: Building context to coordinate writing activity in collaborative teams. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication–SIGDOC ‘12 (pp. 279–287). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2379057.2379109
21.
JonesN. N. (2016). The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472
22.
KellerE. J. (2019). Rhetorical strategies for professional development: Investment mentoring in classrooms and workplaces. Routledge.
23.
LaurenB. (2018). Communicating project management: A participatory rhetoric for development teams. Routledge.
24.
MontgomeryB. L. (2017). Mapping a mentoring roadmap and developing a supportive network for strategic career advancement. SAGE Open, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017710288
OpelD. S.Hart-DavidsonW. (2017). Challenges to patient experience: Documenting evidence-based practice in the family health center. In MarcusA.WangW. (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability: Understanding users and contexts (Vol. 10290, pp. 702–712). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58640-3_50
27.
PiggS. (2014). Coordinating constant invention: Social media’s role in distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.796545
SchreiberJ.MelonçonL. (2019). Creating a continuous improvement model for sustaining programs in technical and professional communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 49(3), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281618759916
SlatteryS. (2007). Undistributing work through writing: How technical writers manage texts in complex information environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250701291046
32.
SpinuzziC. (2014). How nonemployer firms stage-manage ad hoc collaboration: An activity theory analysis. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(2), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.797334
33.
SpinuzziC. (2018). Topsight 2.0: A guide to studying, diagnosing, and fixing information flow in organizations (2nd ed.). CreateSpace.
34.
StaplesS.DilgerB. (2020). Corpus & Repository of Writing [Learner corpus articulated with repository]. https://crow.corporaproject.org/
SwartsJ. (2010). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(2), 127–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651909353307
37.
UysalN. (2016). Social collaboration in intranets: The impact of social exchange and group norms on internal communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415627270
WaltonR. (2013). Stakeholder flux: Participation in technology-based international development projects. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651913490940
