Since 1985, the field of professional communication has grown in size and reputation while maintaining a space within its primary disciplinary home of the English department. This article relies on historical evidence to examine how a field that was once evenly divided between business communication and technical communication is now technical communication-centric, almost to the exclusion of business communication. The authors pose questions about the field of professional communication and how faculty who consider business communication to be their primary discipline (regardless of their disciplinary home) might play a role in future discussions related to disciplinarity and domains of knowledge.
AdamsK. H. (1993). A history of professional writing instruction in American colleges. Southern Methodist University Press.
2.
AllenN.BenninghoffS. (2004). TPC program snapshots: Developing curricula and addressing challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1302_3
3.
AndersonP. (1985). What survey research tells us. In OdellL.GoswamiD. (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 3–86). Guilford Press.
4.
BarrowC. (1990). Universities and the capitalist state. University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
BawarshiA. S.ReiffM. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. Parlor Press.
6.
BerkenkotterC.HuckinT. N. (1993). You are what you cite: Novelty and intertextuality in a biologist’s experimental article. In BlylerN. R.ThrallsC. (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. xi–xv). Sage.
7.
BlylerN. R.ThrallsC. (1993). Preface. In BlylerN. R.ThrallsC. (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 109–127). Sage.
8.
BossardJ.DewhurstJ. F. (1931). University education for business: A study of existing needs and practices. University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
BreretonJ. (1987). The professional writing program and the English department. In KoganM. (Ed.), Writing in the business professions (pp. 278–296). NCTE.
10.
Cargile-CookK.ThrallsC.ZachryM. (2003). Doctoral-level graduates in professional, technical, and scientific communication 1995–2000: A profile. Technical Communication, 50(2), 160–173.
11.
CarradiniS. (2019). Artist communication: An interdisciplinary business and professional communication course. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619826113
12.
CarradiniS.SharpM.BakerM.DavidsonE. (2020). Locations, programs, and content of graduate education in business communication. Business Communication Research and Practice, 3(1), 1–12.
13.
ChapmanD.HarrisJ.HultC. (1995). Agents for change: Undergraduate programs in Departments of English. Rhetoric Review, 13(2), 421–434.
14.
CookK. G.ThrallsC.ZachryM. (2003). Doctoral-level graduates in professional, technical, and scientific communication 1995–2000: A profile. Technical Communication, 50(2), 160–173.
15.
CoutureB.RymerJ. (1993). Situational exigence: Composing processes on the job by task value and writer’s role. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 4–20). Southern Illinois University Press.
16.
CoutureB.Rymer GoldsteinJ. (1985). Cases for technical and professional writing. Little Brown & Co.
De JongM. D. T.HarkinkK. M.BarthS. (2018). Making green stuff?: Effects of corporate greenwashing on consumers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 77–112.
DriskillL. (1989). Understanding the writing context in organizations. In KogenM. (Ed.), Writing in the business professions (pp. 125–145). National Council of Teachers of English and Association for Business Communication.
21.
DubinskyJ. (2002). Service-learning as a path to virtue: The ideal orator in professional communication. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8(2), 61–74.
22.
DubinskyJ. (2010). A techne for citizens. In FrankeD.ReidA.DiRenzoA. (Eds.), Design discourse: Composing and revising programs in professional and technical writing (pp. 277–296). Parlor Press.
23.
DubinskyJ. (2018). Foreward. In LentzP.GetchellK. (Eds.), Rhetorical theory and praxis in the business communication classroom (pp. vi–xvi). Routledge.
24.
FoucaultM. (1984). Space, knowledge, and power. In A. M. Sheridan Smith (Trans.), The Foucault reader (pp. 239–256). Pantheon.
25.
FreedR. C.BroadheadG. J. (1987). Discourse conventions, sacred texts, and institutional norms. College Composition and Communication, 41(1), 409–429.
26.
FreireP. (1983). The pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.
27.
GetchellK. M.LentzP. J. (2018). Rhetorical theory and praxis in the business communication classroom (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351132879
28.
GirouxH. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin and Garvey.
29.
GogginM. (2000). Authoring a discipline: Scholarly journals and the post-World War II emergence of rhetoric and composition. Erlbaum.
HotchkissW. (1920). The basic elements and their proper balance in the curriculum of a collegiate business school. Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 89–107.
32.
HuberB. J. (1996). Undergraduate English programs: Findings from an MLA survey of the 1991–92 academic year. ADE Bulletin, 115(Winter), 34–73.
33.
KeeneM. L. (1987). Effective professional writing. Heath.
34.
KeeneM. L. (Ed.). (1997). Education in scientific and technical communication: Academic programs that work. Society for Technical Communication Press.
35.
KentT. (2007). The “remapping” of professional writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(1), 12–14.
36.
KhuranaR. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton University Press.
37.
KnepperE. G. (1941). History of business education in the United States. Edwards Brothers.
LepeniesG.WeingartP. (1983). Introduction. In GrahamL.LepeniesW.WeingartP. (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary history (pp. ix–xx). Reidel.
44.
LockerK. (2003). Will professional communication be the death of business communication?Business Communication Quarterly, 66(3), 118–132.
45.
LongoB. (2000). Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing. SUNY Press.
46.
LunsfordA. (1991). The nature of composition studies. In LindemannE.TateG. (Eds.), An introduction to composition studies (pp. 3–14). Oxford University Press.
47.
MaillouxS. (2003). Practices, theories, and traditions: Further thoughts on the disciplinary identities of English and communication studies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33(1), 129–138.
48.
MataleneC. B. (Ed.). (1989). Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work. Random House.
49.
MelonconL. (2009). Masters programs in technical communication: A current overview. Technical Communication, 56(2), 137–148.
50.
MoranM. G.JournetD. (Eds.). (1985). Research in technical communication. Greenwood Press.
51.
MorelandP. A. (1977). A history of business education. Pitman.
52.
MoshiriF.CardonP. (2014). The state of business communication classes: A national survey. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490614538489
OberS. (1986). The status of postsecondary business communication instruction—1986 vs. 1982. Journal of Business Communication, 24(3), 49–69.
58.
O’ConnorE. S.LucyD. M. (2019). Proving yourself: How top executives relate their leadership experience. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419863097
59.
OdellL.GoswamiD. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings. Guilford Press.
60.
PhelpsL. (1995). Reproducing composition and rhetoric: The intellectual challenge of doctoral education. Composition Studies, 23(2), 115–132. www.jstor.org/stable/43501350
61.
PhelpsL. W. (1986). The domain of composition. Rhetoric Review, 4(2), 182–195.
62.
PhelpsL. W. (1988). Composition as human science: Contributions to the self-understanding of a discipline. Oxford University Press.
63.
PhelpsL. W.AckermanJ. M. (2010a). Making the case for disciplinarity in rhetoric, composition, and writing studies: The visibility project. College Composition and Communication, 62(1), 180–215.
PopkenR. (1999). The pedagogical dissemination of a genre: The resume in American business discourse textbooks, 1914–1939. JAC, 19(1), 91–116. www.jstor.org/stable/20866224
66.
PorterJ.SullivanP. (2007). Remapping curricular geography: A retrospection. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(1), 15–20.
67.
RaineyK. T. (1999). Doctoral research in technical, scientific, and business communication, 1989–1998. Technical Communication, 46(4), 501–531.
68.
RaineyK. T.KellyR. (1992). Doctoral research in technical communication, 1965–1990. Technical Communication, 39(4), 552–570.
69.
RentzK. (2001). A flare from the margins: The place of professional writing in English departments. Pedagogy, 1(1), 185–190.
70.
RiversW. E. (1980). The place of business writing in English departments: A justification. ADE Bulletin, 65(September), 27–31.
71.
RiversW. E. (1985). The current status of business and technical writing courses in English departments. ADE Bulletin, 82(Winter), pp. 50–54.
72.
RiversW. E. (1999). Studies in the history of business and technical writing: A bibliographic essay. In KynellT. C.MoranM. G. (Eds.), Three keys to the past: The history of technical communication (pp. 249–308). Ablex.
73.
RudeC. D. (2015). Building identity and community through research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(4), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615585753
74.
RussellD. (1991). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870–1990: A curricular history. Southern Illinois University Press.
75.
ScottW. (1913). Training for business at the University of Wisconsin. Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 127–135.
76.
SharpM. R. (2019). Agency, authority, and epideictic rhetoric: A case study of bottom-up organizational change. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(3), 338–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919834979
77.
SheltonC. (2020). Shifting out of neutral: Centering difference, bias, and social justice in a business writing course. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 18–32.
78.
SidesC. (Ed.). (1989). Technical and business communication: Bibliographic essays for teachers and corporate trainers. National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE).
79.
SpinuzziC. (Ed.) (2015). Special issue of JBTC on the rhetoric of entrepreneurship: Theories, methodologies, and practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(4).
80.
StaplesK. (1999). Technical communication from 1950–1998: Where are we now?Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(2), 153–164.
81.
SullivanP.PorterJ. (1993). Remapping curricular geography: Professional writing in/and English. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(4), 389–422.
82.
TebeauxE. (1985). Redesigning professional writing courses to meet the communication needs of writers in business and industry. College Composition and Communication, 36(4), 419–428. https://doi:10.2307/357861
83.
VeblenT. (1918). Higher learning in America: A memorandum on the conduct of universities by businessmen. B.W. Huebsch.
84.
VetterR. J., Spell, C., & Ward, C. (1994). Mosaic and the World Wide Web. Computer, 27(10), 49–57.
85.
WalzerA. E. (1979). Business writing and the liberal arts tradition. ADE Bulletin, 61(May), 23–27.
86.
WeeksF. W. (1985a). Crisis and milestones: ABWA–ABCA–ABC. In PettitJ. D.Jr.BrunoS. J. (Eds.), 50 Years: Golden anniversary commemorative edition (pp. 15–22). AB
87.
WeeksF. W. (1985b). The teaching of business communication at the college level: 1900–1920. In DouglassG. H.HildebrandtH. W. (Eds.), Studies in the history of business writing (pp. 201–215). ABC.
88.
WernerW. W.ThompsonI. K.RothchildJ. (1988). A survey of specialized writing courses for English majors: 1975–76 to 1985–86. Rhetoric Review, 6(7), 204–217.
89.
WhitburnM. D. (1977). The past and future of scientific and technical writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 7(2), 143–149.
90.
WilcoxT. E. (1973). The anatomy of college English. Jossey-Bass.
91.
YatesJ. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of systems in American management (Vol. 6). JHU Press.
92.
YeatsD.ThompsonI. (2010). Mapping technical and professional communication: A summary of academic locations for programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 225–261.
93.
ZachryM. (2000). Communicative practices in the workplace: A historical examination of genre development. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(1), 57–79.
