AcharyaK. R. (2019). Usability for social justice: Exploring the implementation of localization usability in Global North technology in the context of a Global South’s country. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 49(1), 6–32. https://doi:10.1177/0047281617735842
2.
AgbokaG. Y. (2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.3.e
3.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). University of Minnesota Press.
4.
BatovaT.ClarkD. (2015). The complexities of globalized content management. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651914562472
5.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge University Press.
6.
DingH. (2014). Rhetoric of a global epidemic: Transcultural communication about SARS. Southern Illinois University Press.
7.
DingH.SavageG. (2013). Guest editors’ introduction: New directions in intercultural professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.735634
8.
Doheny-FarinaS. (1992). Rhetoric, innovation, technology: Case studies of technical communication in technology transfers. The MIT Press.
9.
DorpenyoI. K. (2019). Risky election, vulnerable technology: Localizing biometric use in elections for the sake of justice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1610502
10.
DroriI.HonigB.WrightM. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00332.x
11.
EssersC.DeyP.TedmansonD.VerduynK. (Eds.). (2017). Critical perspectives on entrepreneurship: Challenging dominant discourses. Taylor & Francis.
12.
FraibergS. (2010). Composition 2.0: Toward a multilingual and multimodal framework. College Composition and Communication, 62(1), 100–126.
13.
FraibergS. (2013). Reassembling technical communication: A framework for studying multilingual and multimodal practices in global contexts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 10–27.
14.
FraibergS. (2017). Start-up nation: Studying transnational entrepreneurial practices in Israel’s start-up ecosystem. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 350–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695541
15.
FraibergS. (2018). Multilingual and multimodal practices at a global startup: Toward a spatial approach to language and literacy in professional contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 55–68.
16.
GerdingJ. M.VealeyK. P. (2017). When is a solution not a solution? Wicked problems, hybrid solutions, and the rhetoric of civic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 290–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695538
17.
GettoG.St.AmantK. (2015). Designing globally, working locally: Using personas to develop online communication products for international users. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2721882.2721886
18.
GettoG.SunH. (2017). Localizing user experience: Strategies, practices, and techniques for culturally sensitive design. Technical Communication, 64(2), 89––94.
19.
GonzalesL. (2018). Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. The University of Michigan Press.
20.
HarveyD. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Blackwell.
21.
HoptonS. B.WaltonR. (2019). One word of heart is worth three of talent: Professional communication strategies in a Vietnamese nonprofit organization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1530033
22.
HunsingerR. P. (2006). Culture and cultural identity in intercultural technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_4
JonesN. N. (2017). Rhetorical narratives of black entrepreneurs: The business of race, agency, and cultural empowerment. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695540
25.
JonesN. N.MooreK. R.WaltonR. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
26.
LaurenB.PiggS. (2016a). Networking in a field of introverts: The egonets, networking practices, and networking technologies of technical communication entrepreneurs. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2614744
27.
LaurenB.PiggS. (2016b). Toward multidirectional knowledge flows: Lessons from research and publication practices of technical communication entrepreneurs. Technical Communication, 63(4), 299–313.
28.
LucasK.KerrickS. A.HaugenJ.CriderC. J. (2016). Communicating entrepreneurial passion: Personal passion vs. perceived passion in venture pitches. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 363–378. https://doi.10.1109/TPC.2016.2607818
29.
MaraA. (2008). Ethos as market maker: The creative role of technical marketing communication in an aviation start-up. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651908320379
30.
MathesonB.PetersenE. J. (2019). Tactics for professional legitimacy: An apparent feminist analysis of Indian women’s experiences in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1659860
31.
MaylathB.St. AmantK. (Eds.). (2019). Translation and Localization: A guide for technical and professional communicators. Routledge.
32.
PalmerZ. B. (2013). Cosmopolitanism: Extending our theoretical framework for transcultural technical communication research and teaching. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(4), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.43.4.c
33.
PihlajaB.DuráL. (2020). Navigating messy research methods and mentoring practices at a bilingual research site on the Mexico-US border. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2020.1790665
34.
RiceR.St.AmantK. (Eds.). (2018). Thinking globally, composing locally: Rethinking online writing in the age of the global Internet. University Press of Colorado.
35.
SarkarS. (2018). Grassroots entrepreneurs and social change at the bottom of the pyramid: The role of bricolage. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3–4), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1413773
SchumpeterJ. A. (1987). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Unwin Paperbacks. (Original work published 1942)
38.
ScottJ. B.LongoB. (2006). Guest editors’ introduction: Making the cultural turn. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_2
39.
ScottJ. B.LongoB.WillsK. V. (2006). Introduction. In ScottJ. B.LongoB.WillsK. V. (Eds.), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 1–19). State University of New York Press.
40.
SibleyD. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Psychology Press.
41.
SmithB. Q. (2012). Reading and writing in the global workplace: Gender, literacy, and outsourcing in Ghana. Lexington Books.
42.
SpartzJ. M.WeberR. P. (2015). Writing entrepreneurs: A survey of attitudes, habits, skills, and genres. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(4), 428–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915588145
43.
SpartzJ. M.WeberR. P. (2017). A technical communication venture in building academic–entrepreneur relations and partnerships. In BridgefordT.AmantK. St. (Eds.), Academy-industry relationships and partnerships: Perspectives for technical communicators (pp. 348–391). Taylor & Francis.
44.
SpinuzziC. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on entrepreneurship communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2607803
45.
SpinuzziC. (2017). Introduction to special issue on the rhetoric of entrepreneurship: Theories, methodologies, and practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695537
46.
SpinuzziC.AltounianD.PogueG. P. (2020). Go or no go: Learning to persuade in an early-stage student entrepreneurship program. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.2982025
47.
SpinuzziC.AltounianD.PogueG.CochranR.ZhuL. (2018). Articulating problems and markets: A translation analysis of entrepreneurs’ emergent value propositions. Written Communication, 35(4), 379–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318786235
48.
SpinuzziC.NelsonS.ThomsonK. S.LorenziniF.FrenchR. A.PogueG.BurbackS. D.MombergerJ. (2014). Making the pitch: Examining dialogue and revisions in entrepreneurs’ pitch decks. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(3), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2342354
49.
SpinuzziC.NelsonS.ThomsonK. S.LorenziniF.FrenchR. A.PogueG.BurbackS. D.MombergerJ. (2015). Remaking the pitch: Reuse strategies in entrepreneurs’ pitch decks. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2015.2415277
50.
Starke-MeyerringD. (2005). Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 468–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651902016002003
51.
SunH. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. Oxford University Press.
52.
SunH. (2020). Global social media design. Oxford University Press.
53.
TedmansonD.VerduynK.EssersC.GartnerW. B. (2012). Critical perspectives in entrepreneurship research. Organization, 19(5), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412458495
54.
ThatcherB. (2006). Intercultural rhetoric, technology transfer, and writing in US–Mexico border maquilas. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1503_6
55.
ThatcherB.St.AmantK.SidesC. H. (2017). Teaching intercultural rhetoric and technical communication: Theories, curriculum, pedagogies and practice. Routledge.
56.
TsingA. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.
57.
VealeyK. P.GerdingJ. M. (2016). Rhetorical work in crowd-based entrepreneurship: Lessons learned from teaching crowdfunding as an emerging site of professional and technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2614742
58.
VerduynK.DeyP.TedmansonD. (2017). A critical understanding of entrepreneurship. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 16(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.161.0037
59.
VerhulsdonckG. (2018). Designing for global mobile: Considering user experience mapping with infrastructure, global openness, local user contexts and local cultural beliefs of technology use. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 5(3), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3188173.3188179
60.
WaltonR. (2014). Editor’s introduction to special issue on intercultural methodology. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, & Globalization, 5(1), 1–13.
61.
WaltonR. (2016). Supporting human dignity and human rights: A call to adopt the first principle of human-centered design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 402–426.
62.
WaltonR.ZralyM.MugenganaJ. P. (2015). Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45–69.
63.
WangX.GuB. (2016). The communication design of WeChat: Ideological as well as technical aspects of social media. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 4(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2875501.2875503
64.
WilliamsS. D.AmmetllerG.Rodríguez-ArduraI.LiX. (2016). A narrative perspective on international entrepreneurship: Comparing stories from the United States, Spain, and China. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2608179
65.
WilliamsS. D.AmmetllerG.Rodríguez-ArduraI.LiX. (2020). Narratives of international women entrepreneurs: An exploratory case study of identity negotiation in technology startups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2961016