AgbokaG. (2012). Liberating intercultural technical communication from “large culture” ideologies: Constructing culture discursively. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42, 159–181.
2.
AppiahK. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. Norton.
3.
BourelleT. (2014). Adapting service-learning into the online technical communication classroom: A framework and model. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23, 247–264.
4.
CookK. C. (2014). Service learning and undergraduate research in technical communication programs. Programmatic Perspective, 6(1), 27–51.
5.
GrabillJ. T. (2012). Community-based research and the importance of a research stance. In NickosonL.SheridanM. P. (Eds.), Writing studies research in practice: Methods and methodologies (pp. 210–219). Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
KankaanrantaA.Louhiala-SalminenL. (2011). Professional communication in a global business context: The notion of global communicative competence. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54(3), 244–262.
7.
SimmonsW. M.ZoeteweyM. W. (2012). Productive usability: Fostering civic engagement and creating more useful online spaces for public deliberation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 251–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2012.673953
8.
Verzosa HurleyE.Kimme HeaA. C. (2014). The rhetoric of reach: Preparing students for technical communication in the age of social media. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 55–68.