By analyzing a case study of organizational decision making at a large research university, this article argues that the agency to make a difference within organizations—to effect organizational change—is not exclusive to those in positions of authority. This case study demonstrates how subordinate members of a university affected management’s decision-making process through their use of rhetorical identification. Specifically, these organizational members gained this agency by reproducing certain values and identities through epideictic rhetoric in order to encourage collective action and effect organizational change from the bottom up.
AgnewL. (2008). “The day belongs to the students”: Expanding epideictic’s civic function. Rhetoric Review, 27, 147–164. doi:10.1080/07350190801921768
2.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A. (2004). Organizational identity. In HatchM. J.SchultzM. (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 89–118). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3.
Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. (KennedyG. A., Trans., 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
Athletic Practice Facility Site Evaluation Committee. (2012). Final report. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech.
5.
BizzellP.HerzbergB. (2001). The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin’s.
6.
Blacksburg Town Council. (2012). A resolution regarding the proposal to destroy a portion of Stadium Woods in order to construct an indoor athletic training facility for the football, soccer, and lacrosse teams (5-A-12). Blacksburg, VA: Author.
7.
BostdorffD. M.VibbertS. L. (1994). Values advocacy: Enhancing organizational images, deflecting public criticism, and grounding future arguments. Public Relations Review, 20, 141–158. doi:10.1016/0363-8111(94)90055-8
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CheneyG. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342–362. doi:10.1080/03637758309390174
12.
CheneyG. (1991). Rhetoric in an organizational society. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
13.
CheneyG.VibbertS. L. (1987). Corporate discourse: Public relations and issue management. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L.RobertsK.PorterL. (Eds.), The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 165–194). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
CintronR. (2010). Democracy and its limitations. In AckermanJ. M.CooganD. J. (Eds.), The public work of rhetoric: Citizen scholars and public engagement (pp. 98–116). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Commission on University Support, Virginia Tech. (2009). The Virginia Tech climate action commitment resolution (2008-2009C). Blacksburg, VA: Author.
17.
ConditC. M. (1985). The functions of the epideictic: The Boston Massacre orations as exemplar. Communication Quarterly, 33, 284–299.
18.
CopenheaverC. A.SeilerJ. R.PetersonJ. A.EvansA. M.McVayJ. L.WhiteJ. H. (2014). Stadium Woods: A dendroecological analysis of an old-growth forest fragment on a university campus. Dendrochronologia, 32, 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.dendro.2013.09.001
19.
CorleyK. G. (2004). Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change. Human Relations, 57, 1145–1177. doi:10.1177/0018726704047141
20.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.
21.
CrableR. E.VibbertS. L. (1983). Mobil’s epideictic advocacy: “Observations’’ of Prometheus-Bound. Communication Monographs, 50, 380–394.
22.
Energy and Sustainability Committee, Virginia Tech. (2009). Virginia Tech climate action commitment and sustainability plan. Blacksburg, VA: Author.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
31.
GioiaD. A.SchultzM.CorleyK. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25, 63–81. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.2791603
HerndlC. G. (2004). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing. In Johnson-EilolaJ.SelberS. A. (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 220–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
HerndlC. G.LiconaA. C. (2007). Shifting agency: Agency, kairos, and the possibilities of social action. In ZachryM.ThrallsC. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 133–153). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
35.
HumphreysM.BrownA. D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23, 421–447. Retrieved fromhttp://oss.sagepub.com/content/23/3/421.short
36.
HuxmanS. S. (2004). Exigencies, explanations, and executions: Toward a dynamic theory of the crisis communication genre. In MillarD. P.HeathR. L. (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 281–297). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
JohnsonD.SellnowT. (1995). Deliberative rhetoric as a step in organizational crisis management: Exxon as a case study. Communication Reports, 8, 54–60. doi:10.1080/08934219509367607
38.
KenneyK. (2002). Building visual communication theory by borrowing from rhetoric. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22, 53–80. doi:10.1080/23796529.2002.11674581
39.
KoerberA.GrahamH. (2017). Theorizing the value of English proficiency in cross-cultural rhetorics of health and medicine: A qualitative study. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31, 63–93. doi:10.1177/1050651916667533
40.
LauerI. (2015). Epideictic rhetoric. Communication Research Trends, 34, 4–18.
NagR.CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 821–847.
43.
PerelmanC. (1979). The new rhetoric and the humanities. Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
44.
PerelmanC.Olbrechts-TytecaL. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (WilkinsonJ.WeaverP., Trans.). Notre Dame, Paris: University of Notre Dame Press.
45.
RavasiD.PhillipsN. (2011). Strategies of alignment: Organizational identity management and strategic change at Bang & Olufsen. Strategic Organization, 9, 103–135. doi:10.1177/1476127011403453
46.
RawlinsJ. D. (2014). Mythologizing change: Examining rhetorical myth as a strategic change management discourse. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 453–472. doi:10.1177/2329490614543136
47.
RiantoputraC. D. (2010). Know thyself: Examining factors that influence the activation of organizational identity concepts in top managers’ minds. Group & Organization Management, 35, 8–38. doi:10.1177/1059601109354804
SharpM. R. (2013). Organizational identity-power in practice: The rhetorics of university identity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
52.
SheardC. M. (1996). The public value of epideictic rhetoric. College English, 58, 765–794. doi:10.2307/378414
53.
SillinceJ. A. A. (2006). Resources and organizational identities: The role of rhetoric in the creation of competitive advantage. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 186–212. doi:10.1177/0893318906293587
54.
SpinuzziC. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441. doi:10.1177/1050651912444070
55.
StahleyM. B.BoydJ. (2006). Winning is(n’t) everything: The paradox of excellence and the challenge of organizational epideictic. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 311–330. doi:10.1080/00909880600908575
56.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
SullivanD. L. (1993). The ethos of epideictic encounter. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 26, 113–133. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40237759
59.
TomlinsonE.NewmanS. (2018). Epideictic rhetoric born digital: Evolution of the letter of recommendation genre. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32, 3–37. doi:10.1177/1050651917729862
60.
WaymerD. (2009). Connecting organizations and their employee publics. In HeathR. L.TothE. L.WaymerD. (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 216–232). New York, NY: Routledge.
