Framed around three different antenarratives about system development, this article builds on established user-centered theories to present a mixed-method approach to user experience (UX) design. By combining network theory, storytelling, and process mapping, this article provides a practical method of including users’ experiences during the predevelopment stages of building workplace-specific digital technologies. Specifically, this article argues for the collection of user-generated antenarratives as the first step in UX product development and demonstrates how to use those experience-based stories.
AndrewsC.BurlesonD.DunksK.ElmoreK.LambertC. S.OppegaardB.…ZobelG. (2012). A new method in user-centered design: Collaborative prototype design process (CPDP). Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42, 123–142.
2.
BojeD. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London, England: Sage.
3.
BojeD. M. (2008). Storytelling organizations. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
CastellsM. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology, 51, 5–24.
6.
CourageC.BaxterK. (2005). Understanding your users: A practical guide to user requirements. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
7.
DebrayR. (2004). Transmitting culture (RauthE., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1997)
8.
DenningS. (2004). Squirrel Inc.: A fable of leadership through storytelling. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
9.
DenningS. (2011a). The leader’s guide to storytelling: Mastering the art and discipline of business narrative. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
10.
DenningS. (2011b). The springboard: How storytelling ignites action in knowledge-era organizations. New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 2001)
11.
DrevinL.DalcherD. (2011). Antenarrative and narrative: The experiences of actors involved in the development and use of information systems. In BojeD. M. (Ed.), Storytelling and the future of organizations: An antenarrative handbook (pp. 148–162). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
FaberB. (2002). Community action and organizational change: Image, narrative, identity. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
13.
FormanJ. (2013). Storytelling in business: The authentic and fluent organization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
GabrielY. (2011). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 2000)
15.
GallowayA. R.ThackerE. (2007). The exploit: A theory of networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
GettoG.PottsL.SalvoM. J.GossettK. (2013). Teaching UX: Designing programs to train the next generation of UX experts. SIGDOC 2013, 65–70. doi:10.1145/2507065.2507082
17.
GordonG. G. (1990). Cultural imperative for industry-oriented performance. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 33, 89–93.
18.
GrabillJ. T. (2007). Sustaining community-based work: Community-based research and community building. In TakayoshiP.SullivanP. (Eds.), Labor, writing technologies, and the shaping of composition in the academy (pp. 325–339). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
19.
GrohK. (2005). Storytelling in making educational videos. In BrownJ. S.DenningS.GrohK.PrusakL. (Eds.), Storytelling organizations: Why storytelling is transforming 21st century organizations and management (pp. 137–163). Oxford, England: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
20.
IJsselingJ. C. (2008). Rhetoric and philosophy in conflict: An historical survey (DunphyP., Trans.). New York, NY: Springer. (Original work published 1976)
21.
JohnsonR. R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
JohnsonR. R. (2010). The ubiquity paradox: Further thinking on the concept of user centeredness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19, 335–351.
23.
KingS. (2011). Survival toolkit for sociotechnical project complexity. In BojeD. M. (Ed.), Storytelling and the future of organizations: An antenarrative handbook (pp. 221–240). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
KostelnickC.HassettM. (2003). Shaping information: The rhetoric of visual conventions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
25.
LatourB. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
LatourB. (2002). Aramis or the love of technology (PorterC., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
MooreK. (2013). Exposing hidden relations: Storytelling, pedagogy, and the study of policy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43, 63–78.
28.
MooreK. R.ElliottT. J. (2016). From participatory design to a listening infrastructure: A case of urban planning and participation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30, 59–84.
29.
ParkinM. (2010). Tales for change: Using storytelling to develop people and organizations. London, England: Kogan Page. (Original work published 2004)
QuesenberyW.BrooksK. (2010). Storytelling for user experience: Crafting stories for better design [Kindle version]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.amazon.com/
32.
ReissnerS.PaganV. (2013). Storytelling in management practice: Dynamics and implications. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
SchneiderS. (2005). Usable pedagogies: Usability, rhetoric, and sociocultural pedagogy in the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, 447–467.
34.
SilvermanL. (2006). Wake me up when the data is over: How organizations use stories to drive results. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
35.
SimmonsW. M. (2007). Participation and power: Civic discourse in environmental policy decisions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
SpinuzziC. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
SullivanP.PorterJ. (1997). Opening spaces: Writing technologies and critical research practices. Westport, CT: Ablex.
38.
TaylorM. C. (2003). The moment of complexity: Emerging network culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
WhitneyM. A. (1989). Analyzing corporate communications policy using ethnographic methods. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32, 76–80.
40.
Zwijze-KoningK. H.De JongM. D. T. (2015). Network analysis as a communication audit instrument: Uncovering communicative strengths and weaknesses within organizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29, 36–60.
