Do Community Members Have an Effective Voice in the Ethical Deliberation of a Behavioral Institutional Review Board?

Abstract

Using concepts and methods from technical and professional communication and linguistics, the authors conducted an observational study of the voice of community members (CMs) in the deliberation of a behavioral institutional review board (IRB). In the discourse of deliberation, they found that CMs had an effective voice in constructing the compliance of individual research protocols under IRB review. But they also found that CMs had an ineffective voice in representing their African-American community, particularly in their efforts to advocate for more consideration of minority research sites and subjects and a fuller consideration of minority community attitudes.

Keywords

Institutional Review Board IRB nonscientist nonaffiliated NS–NA community members voice deliberation discourse analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Grady

(2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6, 3–19. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3

Allison

R. D.

Abbott

L. J.

Wichman

(2008). Nonscientist institutional review board members at the National Institutes of Health. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 30, 8–13.

Amdur

R. J.

Bankert

E. A.

(2011). Institutional review board: Member handbook. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Anderson

E. E.

(2006). A qualitative study of non-affiliated, non-scientist institutional review board members. Accountability in Research, 13, 135–155. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/08989620600654027

APA Style Blog. (2015). Using italics for technical (or key) terms. Retrieved from http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/04/using-italics-for-technical-or-key-terms.html

Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs. (2012). Home page. Retrieved from http://www.aahrpp.org/

Austin

J. L.

(1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Beauchamp

T. L.

(2004, 9 22). Oral history of the Belmont Report and the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research/Interviewer: B. A. Schwetz. Retrieved from https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/cnn4/InterviewBeauchamp.pdf

Bilbow

G. T.

(1998). Look who’s talking: An analysis of “chair-talk” in business meetings. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, 157–197. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/1050651998012002001

10.

Candilis

P. J.

Lidz

C. W.

Appelbaum

P. S.

Arnold

R. M.

Gardner

Garverich

… Simon

L. J

. (2012). The silent majority: Who speaks at IRB meetings? Institutional Review Board, 34, 15–20.

11.

Edmondson

(1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. New York, NY: Longman.

12.

Elbow

(2007). Voice in writing again: Embracing contraries. College English, 70, 168–188. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=eng_faculty_pubs

13.

Fitzgerald

M. H.

Phillips

P. A.

Yule

. (2006). The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives. Ethics & Behavior, 16, 377–395. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1604_7

14.

Gawande

(2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Picador.

15.

Gunsalus

C. K.

Bruner

E. M.

Burbules

Dash

L. D.

Finkin

Goldberg

… Pratt

M. G

. (2006). The Illinois white paper—Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB mission creep (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 902995). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=902995

16.

Habermas

(1984). The theory of communicative action ( Thompson

Held

, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

17.

HealthyPeople. (2020). Disparities. Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/foundation-health-measures/disparities

18.

Heath

S. B.

(1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge.

19.

Hedgecoe

(2008). Research ethics review and the sociological research relationship. Sociology, 42, 873–886. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094567

20.

Howard

(2004). What does research tell us about classroom discussion? In Howard

(Ed.), Discussion in the college classroom: Applications for sociology instruction (pp. 2–8). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

21.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732305276687

22.

Huckin

T. N.

(1992). Context-sensitive text analysis. In Kirsch

Sullivan

P. A.

(Eds.), Methods and methodology in composition research (pp. 84–104). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

23.

Jefferson

(Ed.). (1992). Harvey Sacks: Lectures on conversation. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

24.

Karp

Yoels

(1976). The college classroom: Some observations on the meaning of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, 60, 421–439.

25.

King

P. A.

(2004, 9 9). Oral history of the Belmont Report and the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research/Interviewer: L. B. Walters. Retrieved from https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/cnn4/InterviewKing.pdf

26.

King

P. A.

(2005). Justice beyond Belmont. In Childress

J. F.

Meslin

E. M.

Shapiro

H. T.

(Eds.), Belmont revisited: Ethical principles for research with human subjects (pp. 136–147). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

27.

Klitzman

(2012). Institutional review board community members: Who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent? Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87, 975–981. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549463/

28.

Klitzman

(2015). The ethics police: The struggle to make human research safe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

29.

Lamont

(2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

30.

Lidz

C. W.

Simon

L. J.

Seligowski

A. V.

Myers

Gardner

Candilis

P. J.

… Appelbaum

P. S

. (2012). The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7, 1–6. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.1

31.

Mehan

(1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

32.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979, 4 18). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

33.

National Research Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 289 § 474. Institutional review boards; Ethics guidance program. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg342.pdf

34.

Porter

J. P.

(1986). What are the ideal characteristics of unaffiliated/nonscientist IRB members? IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 8, 1–6. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2307/3564370

35.

Porter

J. P.

(1987). How unaffiliated/nonscientist members of institutional review boards see their roles. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 9, 1–6. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2307/3563622

36.

Rickford

J. R.

Rickford

R. J.

(2000). Spoken soul: The story of Black English. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

37.

Rothman

D. J.

(1991). Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York, NY: Basic Books.

38.

Schneider

(2015). The censor’s hand: The misregulation of human-subject research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

39.

Schrag

Z. M.

(2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965-2009. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

40.

Seligman

M. E. P.

Csikszentmihalyi

(2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

41.

Sengupta

(2003). The roles and experiences of nonaffiliated and non-scientist members of institutional review boards. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 78, 212–218.

42.

Smith

D. E.

(1974). The social construction of documentary reality. SOIN Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.

43.

Stark

L. J. M.

(2012). Behind closed doors: IRBs and the making of ethical research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

44.

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1974, 5 30). Title 45—Public welfare part 46—Protection of human subjects. Retrieved from http://wayback.archive-it.org/4657/20150930181944/http://archive.hhs.gov/ohrp/documents/19740530.pdf

45.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). OHRP institutional review board guidebook. Retrieved from http://wayback.archive-it.org/org-745/20150930181805/http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/irb/irb_guidebook.htm

46.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1998a, 6). Institutional review boards: Promising approaches. Retrieved from http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00191.pdf

47.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1998b, 6). Institutional review boards: A time for reform. Retrieved from http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00193.pdf

48.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Title 45—Public Welfare CFR 46 Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html

49.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). OHRP educational videos: IRB membership. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHtIbdLkSwU&list=PL5965CB14C2506914&index=7

50.

Veatch

R. M.

(1975). Human experimentation committees: Professional or representative? Hastings Center Report, 5, 31–40. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2307/3561227

51.

Washington

H. A.

(2006). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. New York, NY: Doubleday.