This study applies three models of attribution to examine the public’s responses to corporate crises. Using Kelley’s covariation model and Coombs’s situational crisis communication theory, the study shows that distinctiveness information has strong and robust effects, consistency information has some effects, and consensus information has no effects on attributions of corporate responsibility, purchase intentions, and punitive opinions. Based on Weiner’s model, this study finds that attributions of corporate responsibility result in punitive opinions guided by retributive rather than utilitarian motivations.
AppelbaumL. (2001). The influence of perceived deservingness on policy decisions regarding aid to the poor. Political Psychology, 22, 419–442.
2.
ArpanL. M. (2002). When in Rome? The effects of spokesperson ethnicity on audience evaluation of crisis communication. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 314–339.
BennettT. R.FloresM. S. (1998). Help giving in achievement contexts: A developmental and cultural analysis of the effects of children's attributions and affects on their willingness to help. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 659.
7.
BenoitW. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
ChanH.WanL. C. (2008). Consumer responses to service failures: A resource preference model of cultural influences. Journal of International Marketing, 16, 72–97.
9.
ChoiJ.ChungW. (2013). Analysis of the interactive relationship between apology and product involvement in crisis communication: An experimental study on the Toyota recall crisis. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 3–31.
10.
CoombsW. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 447–476.
11.
CoombsW. T. (2004). Impact of past crisis on current crisis communications: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 265–289.
12.
CoombsW. T. (2006). The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management, 12, 241–260.
13.
CoombsW. T. (2007). Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review, 33, 135–139.
14.
CoombsW. T. (2010). Parameters for crisis communication. In CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 17–53). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
15.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279–295.
16.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2001). An extended examination of the crisis situation: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 321–340.
17.
CorriganP.MarkowitzF. E.WatsonA.RowanD.KubiakM. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 162.
18.
CullenF. T.ClarkG. A.CullenJ. B.MathersR. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305–331.
19.
DeanD. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 192–211.
20.
FolkesV. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 548–565.
GrahamS.WeinerB.ZuckerG. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 331–346.
23.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
24.
HewstoneM.JasparsJ. (1983). A re-examination of the roles of consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness: Kelley’s cube revisited. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 41–50.
25.
HorsleyJ. S.BarkerR. T. (2002). Toward a synthesis model for crisis communication in the public sector: An initial investigation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, 406–440.
26.
HwangY.JeongS.-H. (2012). Public's responses to aviation accidents: The role of exemplification and attributions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40, 350.
27.
JasparsJ. (1983). The process of causal attribution in common sense. In HewstoneM. (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions (pp. 28–44). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
28.
JeongS.-H. (2007). Effects of news about genetics and obesity on perceived controllability and helping behavior. Health Communication, 22, 221–228.
29.
JeongS.-H. (2009). Public’s responses to an oil spill accident: A test of the attribution theory and situational crisis communication theory. Public Relations Review, 35, 307–309.
30.
JeongS.-H. (2010). Public support for Haitian earthquake victims: Role of attributions and emotions. Public Relations Review, 36, 325–328.
31.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of the behavior. In JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
32.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
33.
KelleyH. H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction. In JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
34.
KiE.BrownK. A. (2013). The effects of crisis response strategies on relationship quality outcomes. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 403–420.
35.
LeeB. (2004). Audience-oriented approach to crisis communication: A study of Hong Kong consumers' evaluation of an organizational crisis. Communication Research, 31, 600–618.
36.
LeeS. H. (2009). Samsung Heavy Industries’ crisis response strategies, the topics and tone of news coverage related to Taean oil spill: Content analysis of the news articles of five Korean newspapers(Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Florida, Gainesville. Retrieved fromhttp://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0025019/lee_s.pdf
37.
MajorB. (1980). Information acquisition and attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1010–1023.
38.
McArthurL. A. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171–193.
39.
MizerskiR. W.GoldenL. L.KernanJ. B. (1979). The attribution process in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 123–140.
40.
MoonB. B.RheeY. (2012). Message strategies and forgiveness during crises: Effects of causal attributions and apology appeal types on forgiveness. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 677–694.
41.
NelsonT. E. (1999). Group affect and attribution in social policy opinion. Journal of Politics, 61, 331.
42.
NisbettR.MiyamotoY. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic and analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.
43.
PoonP. S.HuiM. K.AuK. (2004). Attributions of dissatisfying service encounters: A cross cultural comparison between Canadian and PRC consumers. European Journal of Marketing, 38, 1527–1540.
44.
ReynaC.TuckerA.KorfmacherW.HenryP. J. (2005). Searching for common ground between supporters and opponents of affirmative action. Political Psychology, 26, 667–682.
SkitkaL. J.McMurrayP. J.BurroughsT. E. (1991). Willingness to provide post-war aid to Iraq and Kuwait: An application of the contingency model of distributive justice. Contemporary Social Psychology, 15, 179–188.
47.
SkitkaL. J.TetlockP. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.
48.
StephensK. K.MaloneP.BaileyC. M. (2005). Communicating with stakeholders during a crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 390–419.
49.
TaggarS.NeubertM. (2004). The impact of poor performers on team outcomes: An empirical examination of attribution theory. Personnel Psychology, 57, 935–968.
50.
TygartC. E. (2000). Genetic causation attribution and public support of gay rights. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 259–275.
51.
Vázquez-CasiellesR.Rio-LanzaA. B.Díaz-MartínA. M. (2006). Quality of past performance: Impact on consumers’ responses to product failure. Marketing Letters, 18, 249–264.
52.
WeinerB. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
WeinerB. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1–14.
54.
WeinerB. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
55.
WeinerB.GrahamS.ReynaC. (1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment. Social Justice Research, 10, 431–452.
