Student compositions traditionally are written for the teacher. Yet instructors of professional communication genres have discovered that students' motivation may be enhanced when they write assignments for audiences of peers within the classroom or professionals outside the campus. Yet client-based projects require writing students who have never yet written for an external audience to make a leap beyond the classroom. To bridge the gap between writing for classroom peers and writing for professional clients, this article describes a third and intermediate choice of audience, namely, external peers in cross-classroom collaborations that occur via telecommunication. The author places this intermediate-audience strategy within the larger conversation about the impact of audience on student writing outcomes, applies the strategy to professional writing pedagogy, and reports the results of a small pilot study that provide some preliminary support for the strategy.
Alberts, D.S., & Hayes, R.E. (2003). Power to the edge. Retrieved November 23, 2007, from http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_Power.pdf
2.
Blakeslee, A.M. (2001). Bridging the workplace and academy: Teaching professional genres through classroom-workplace collaborations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 169-192.
3.
Ching, K.L. (2007). Peer response in the composition classroom: An alternative genealogy. Rhetoric Review, 26, 303-319.
4.
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4-15.
5.
Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students' writing . American Educational Research Journal, 26, 143-159.
6.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
7.
Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. White Plains, NY: Longman.
8.
Engström, Y., Engström, R., & Vähääho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 345-374). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
9.
Freedman, S.W. (1987). Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classrooms (CSW-TR-12). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
10.
Gere, A.R. (1987). Writing groups: History, theory, and implications . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
11.
Herrington, A.J. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-361.
12.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.
McEachern, R.W. (2001). Problems in service learning and technical/professional writing: Incorporating the perspective of nonprofit management. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 211-224.
15.
McInerney, D.M. (2005). Education psychology: Theory, research, and teaching. A 25-year retrospective. Educational Psychology, 25, 585-599.
16.
Miller, C.R., & Charney, D. (2007). Persuasion, argument, and audience. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 583-589). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Morgan, M., Allen, N., Moore, T., Atkinson, D., & Snow, C. (1987). Collaborative writing in the classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 50, 20-26.
18.
Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and the activity in intensional networks . Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205-242.
19.
Paretti, M.C., McNair, L.D., & Holloway-Attaway, L. (2007). Teaching technical communication in an era of distributed work: A case study of collaboration between U.S. and Swedish students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 327-352.
20.
Penuel, W., & Riel, M. (2007, April). The "new" science of networks and the challenge of school. Phi Delta Kappan, 611-615.
21.
Preuss, N. (1999). The legacy of schooling: Secondary school composition and the beginning college writer. In K. L. Weese, S. L. Fox, & S. Greene (Eds.), Teaching academic literacy (pp. 67-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Riel, M. (1990). Cooperative learning across classrooms in electronic learning circles. Instructional Science, 19, 445-466.
23.
Riel, M. (1992). Learning circles: A functional analysis of educational telecomputing. Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 15-30.
24.
Riel, M. (1993). Global education through learning circles. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computer and international communication. Cambridge, MA : MIT.
25.
Riel, M. (1995). Cross-classroom collaboration in global learning circles. In S. L. Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
Riel, M. (1996). Cross-classroom collaboration: Communication and education. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 187-207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Riel, M. (1997) Learning circles make global connections. In R. Donath & I. Volkmer (Eds.), Das Transatlantische Klassenzimmer. Hamburg, Germany: Korber-Stiftung.
28.
Riel, M. (2000). Learning circles: Virtual communities for elementary and secondary schools (ED441665). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
29.
Riel, M. (2006). Culture of critique: Online learning circles and peer reviews in graduate education. In J. Rhoads & E. Ellis (Eds.), Self, peer and group assessment in e-learning (pp. 142-168). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
30.
Riel, M., & Fulton, K. (2001, March). The role of technology in supporting learning communities. Phi Delta Kappan, 518-523.
31.
Riel, M., & Pollin, L. (2004). Online learning communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environment. In S. Barab, R. Kling , & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 16-52). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Sapp, D.A., & Crabtree, R.D. (2002). A laboratory in citizenship: Service learning in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11, 411-431.
33.
Sperling, M. (1990). I want to talk to each of you: Collaboration and the teacher-student writing conference. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 279-321.
34.
Spinuzzi, C. (2007). Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 265-277.
35.
Vanderburg, R.M. (2006). Reviewing research on teaching writing based on Vygotsky's theories: What we can learn. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22, 375-393.
36.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Wojahn, P., Dyke, J., Riley, L.A., Hensel, E., & Brown, S.C. (2001). Blurring boundaries between technical communication and engineering: Challenges of a multidisciplinary, client-based pedagogy . Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 129-148.
