This article reports a case study of three multinational companies that work together in a consortium, focusing on intercompany and intracompany variation in writing products and processes. The authors discuss variation in two genres: meeting minutes and internal memos. Adopting a social constructionist, communities of practice (CofP) approach, they argue that the companies form overarching constellations of CofP. Although the participants broadly work with the same genres of written documents, the form of these documents varies according to the local context, audience, and purpose. The authors discuss the implications of their findings, with particular reference to the difficulty writers face when they make the transition from writing for one community of practice to writing for another.
Alford, E. (1989). The text and the trade association: A story of documents at work. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp. 136-152). New York: Random House .
2.
Angouri, J. (2007). Language in the workplace. A multimethod study of communicative activity in seven multinational companies situated in Europe . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex , UK.
3.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. , & Harris, S.J. (1995). Towards the generic structure of meetings in British and Italian Managements . Text,15, 531-560 .
4.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. , & Nickerson, C. (1999). Business writing as social action. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing business: Genres, media & discourses (pp. 1-32). London: Longman .
5.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. , & Nickerson, C. (2002). Business discourse: Old debates, new horizons . IRAL, 40, 273-286 .
6.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions . In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-99). London: Taylor & Francis .
7.
Beaufort, A. (1997). Operationalizing the concept of discourse community: A case study of one institutional site of composing . Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 486-529 .
8.
Beaufort, A. (1999). Writing in the real world: Making the transition from school to work. New York: Teachers College Press .
9.
Beaufort, A. (2000). Learning the trade: A social apprenticeship model for gaining writing expertise . Written Communication, 17, 185-224 .
10.
Beaufort, A. (2004). Developmental gains of a history major: A case for building a theory of disciplinary writing expertise . Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 136-185 .
11.
Beaufort, A. (2006). Writing in the professions. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Research on composition (pp. 217-242). New York: Teachers College Press .
12.
Berger, P. , & Luckmann, T. (1967). Die gesellschaftliche konstruktion der wirklichkeit [The social construction of reality]. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer .
13.
Berkenkotter, C. , & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
14.
Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view . London: Continuum .
15.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, UK : Polity.
16.
Bracewell, R.J. , & Witte, S.P. (2003). Tasks, ensembles, and activity: Linkages between text production and situation of use in the workplace . Written Communication, 20, 511-559 .
Cameron, D. , Frazer, E. , Harvey, P. , Rampton, M.B.H. , & Richardson, K. (1992). Researching language: Issues of power and method. New York: Routledge .
19.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2-27). London: Longman .
20.
Casanave, C.P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
21.
Couture, B. (1992). Categorizing professional discourse: Engineering, administrative, and technical/professional writing . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, 5-37 .
22.
Davies, C. , & Birbili, M. (2000). What do people need to know about writing in order to write in their jobs?British Journal of Educational Studies , 48, 429-441 .
23.
Devitt, A.J. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. G. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336-357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
24.
Dias, P. , Freedman, A. , Medway, P. , & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
25.
Dias, P. , & Paré, A. (Eds.). (2000). Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton .
26.
Duin, A. , & Hansen, C. (1996). Nonacademic writing: Social theory and technology . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
27.
Earley, P.C. , & Gibson, C.B. (2002). Multinational teams: New perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
28.
Eckert, P. , & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice . Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461-490 .
29.
Ede, L. , & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative learning. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press .
30.
Eisenberg, E.M. , & Riley, P. (2001). Organizational culture. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 291-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
31.
Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford .
32.
Faigley, L. , & Miller, T.P. (1982). What we learn from writing on the job . College English, 44, 557-569 .
33.
Flower, L. , & Ackerman, J. (1994). Writers at work: Strategies for communicating in business & professional settings. Fort Worth, TX : Harcourt Brace .
34.
Freedman, A. , & Adam, C. (1996). Learning to write professionally: “Situated learning” and the transition from university to professional discourse . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 395-427 .
Gunnarsson, B.L. (1995). Studies of language for specific purposes: A biased view of a rich reality . International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 5, 111-134 .
37.
Gunnarsson, B.L. (1997). The writing process from a sociolinguistic viewpoint . Written Communication, 24, 139-188 .
38.
Harris, T. (1993). Applied organisation communication: Perspectives, principles, and pragmatics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
39.
Harris, S.J. , & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (1997). The languages of business: Introduction and overview. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & S. J. Harris (Eds.), The languages of business: An international perspective (pp. 1-18). Edinburgh , UK: Edinburgh University Press .
40.
Holmes, J. (1999). Communities of practice in language and gender research . Language in Society, 28, 171-320 .
41.
Holmes, J. (2000). Victoria University's language in the workplace project: An overview (Language in the workplace occasional papers, 1). Retrieved April 21, 2005, from www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/research/lwp/docs/ops/op1.htm
42.
Holmes, J. (2005). When small talk is a big deal: Sociolinguistic challenges in the workplace. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 344-371). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press .
43.
Holmes, J. , & Marra, M. (2002). Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal ofPragmatics, 34, 1683-1710 .
44.
Holmes, J. , & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace. London: Pearson Education .
45.
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
46.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
47.
Jørgensen, P.E.F. (2005). The dynamics of business letters: Define creative variation in established genres. In P. Gillaerts & M. Gotti (Eds.), Genre variation in business letters (pp. 147-178). Bern , Switzerland: Lang .
48.
Kleimann, S. (1993). The reciprocal relationship of workplace culture and review. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 71-83). Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press .
49.
Kreth, M.L. (2000). A survey of the co-op writing experiences of recent engineering graduates . IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , 43, 137-151 .
50.
Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge .
51.
Ledwell-Brown, J. (2000). Organizational cultures as contexts for learning to write. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 199-222). Cresskill, NJ : Hampton .
52.
Louhiala-Salminen, L. (1996). The business communication classroom vs. reality: What should we teach today?English for Specific Purposes , 15(1), 37-51 .
53.
Louhiala-Salminen, L. , & Kankaanranta, A. (2005). Hello Monica, kindly change your arrangements: Business genres in a state of flux. In P. Gillaerts & M. Gotti (Eds.), Genre variation in business letters, linguistic insights (pp. 55-84). Bern , Switzerland: Lang.
54.
Lutz, J. (1989). Writers in organizations and how they learn the image: Theory, research, and implications. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp. 113-135). New York: Random House .
55.
MacKinnon, J. (1993). Becoming a rhetor: Developing writing ability in a mature, writing-intensive organisation. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace (pp. 41-55). Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press .
56.
McElhinny, B. (2003). Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 21-43). Oxford , UK: Basil Blackwell .
57.
Mercado, S. , Welford, R. , & Prescott, K. (2001). European business. London : Financial Times/ Prentice Hall .
58.
Miller, C.R. (1984). Genre as social action . Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167 .
59.
Miller, C.R. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). London : Taylor & Francis .
60.
Myers, G. (1985). The social construction of two biologists' proposals . Written Communication, 12, 219-245 .
61.
Nickerson, C. (2000). Playing the corporate language game. An investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers in multinational corporations. Amsterdam: Rodopi .
62.
Nickerson, C. , & De Groot, E. (2005). Dear shareholder, dear stockholder, dear stakeholder: The business letter genre in the annual general report. In M. Gotti & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), Genre variation in business letters (pp. 324-346). Bern , Switzerland: Lang .
63.
Northey, M. (1990). The need for writing skill in accounting firms . Management Communication Quarterly, 3, 474-495 .
64.
Odell, L. (1985). Beyond the text: Relations between writing and the social context. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 249-280). New York: Guilford .
65.
Odell, L. , & Goswami, D. (1982). Writing in a non-academic setting . Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 201-223 .
66.
Odell, L. , Goswami, D. , & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings . In P. Mosenthal , L. Tamor , & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 221-236). New York: Longman .
67.
Paradis, J. , Dobrin, D. , & Miller, R. (1985).Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R&D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford .
68.
Paré, A. (2000). Writing as a way into social work: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 145-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton .
69.
Paré, A. (2002). Keeping writing in its place. In B. Mirel & R. Spilka (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st Century (pp. 57-73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
70.
Pogner, K.H. (2003). Writing and interacting in the discourse community of engineering. Journal ofPragmatics, 35, 855-867 .
71.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines . English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141-156 .
72.
Sarangi, S. , & Roberts, C. (Eds.). (1999). Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin, Germany : Mouton de Gruyter .
73.
Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
74.
Schneider, B. , & Andre, J. (2005). University preparation for workplace writing: Perceptions of students in three disciplines . Journal of Business Communication, 42, 195-218 .
75.
Schryer, C.F. (1993). Records as genre . Written Communication , 10, 200-234 .
76.
Schryer, C.F. (2000). Walking a fine line: Writing negative letters in an insurance company . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 445-497 .
77.
Spilka, R. (1990). Orality and literacy in the workplace: Process- and text-based strategies for multiple-audience adaptation. Journal of Business &Technical Communication, 4, 44-67 .
78.
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2005). Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 468-499 .
79.
Storck, J. , & Hill, P. (2000). Knowledge diffusion through “strategic communities .” Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 63-74 .
80.
Stubbe, M. (2001). From office to production line: Collecting data for the Wellington Language in the Workplace Project. (Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, 2). Retrieved April 20, 2005, from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/research/lwp/docs/ops/op2.htm
81.
Trosborg, A. , & Jørgensen, P. E. F. (Eds.). (2005). Business discourse: Texts and contexts. Bern , Switzerland: Lang .
82.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker. Retrieved November 13, 2006, from http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml
83.
Winsor, D.A. (1989). An engineer's writing and the corporate construction of knowledge . Written Communication, 6, 270-285 .
84.
Zarifian, P. (1996). Travail et communication: Essai sociologique sur le travail dans la grande entreprise industrielle [Work and communication: Sociological essay on work in the big industrial enterprise]. Paris: PUF .
