Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article uses qualitative material gathered at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to construct a model of the rhetorical activity that occurs at the boundaries between diverse communities of practice working on complex sociotechnical systems. The authors reinterpret the notion of the boundary object current in science studies as a rhetorical construct that can foster cooperation and communication among the diverse members of heterogeneous working groups. The knowledge maps constructed by team members at LANL in their work on technical systems are boundary objects that can replace the demarcation exigence that so often leads to agonistic rhetorical boundary work with an integrative exigence. The integrative exigence realized by the boundary object of the knowledge map can help create a temporary trading zone characterized by rhetorical relations of symmetry and mutual understanding. In such cases, boundary work can become an effort involving integration and understanding rather than contest, controversy, and demarcation.

Keywords

boundary object boundary work epistemic symmetry knowledge mapping rhetorical exigency trading zone

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Fujimura, J. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation.” In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168-211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Galison, P. (1997). The trading zone: Coordinating action and belief. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics (pp. 781-845). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.

Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Harris, R. (2005). Rhetoric and incommensurability. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

Jameson, F. (1992). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

10.

Katz, S. , & Miller, C. (1996). The low-level radioactive waste siting controversy in North Carolina: Toward a rhetorical model of risk communication. In C. Herndl & S. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 111-140). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

11.

Koehler, A. , & Klamann, R. (2004). Gromit: A tool for systems ethnography (LA-UR-04-4370). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.

12.

Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Miller, C. (2005). Novelty and heresy in the debate on nonthermal effects on electromagnetic fields. In R. A. Harris (Ed.), Rhetoric and incommensurability (pp. 646-506). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

15.

Prelli, L. (1997). The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos. In R. Harris (Ed.), Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies (pp. 87-106). Mahwah, NJ: Hermagoras.

16.

Smith, B. (1997). Belief and resistance: The dynamics of contemporary intellectual debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

17.

Star, S. (Ed.). (1995). Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

18.

Star, S. , & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.

19.

Taylor, C. (1996). Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

20.

Waddell, C. (1996). Saving the Great Lakes: Public participation in environmental controversy. In C. Herndl & S. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 141-165). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

21.

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Wilson, A. , McNamara, L. , & Wilson, G. (2007). Information integration for complex systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 121-130.

Boundary Objects as Rhetorical Exigence: Knowledge Mapping and Interdisciplinary Cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References