A Reflection on Risk Communication,Metacommunication,and Rhetorical Stases in the Aspen-EPA Superfund Controversy

Covello, V. , von Winterfeldt, D. , & Slovic, P. (1987). Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks: Problems and opportunities for a social and behavioral perspective. In V. Covello , L. Lave , A. Moghissi , & V. Uppurluri (Eds.), Uncertainty in risk assessment, risk management, and decision making (pp. 221-239). New York: Plenum.

Johnson, B. B. (1999). Ethical issues in risk communication: Continuing the discussion. RiskAnalysis, 19, 335-348.

Mirel, B. (1994). Debating nuclear energy: Theories of risk and purposes of communication.Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, 41-65.

Morgan, M. G. , & Lave, L. (1990). Ethical considerations in risk communication practice and research. Risk Analysis, 10, 355-358.

National Research Council, Committee on Risk Perception and Communication . (1989).Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Renn, O. , & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. In R. Kasperson & P. Stallen (Eds.), Communicating risk to the public: International perspectives(pp. 175-218). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Renn, O. , Webler, T. , & Wiedemann, P. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Rowan, K. E. (1994). The technical and democratic approaches to risk situations: Their appeal, limitations, and rhetorical alternatives. Argumentation, 8, 391-409.

Sauer, B. (2003). The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Stratman, J. F. , Boykin, C. , Holmes, M. C. , Laufer, M. J. , & Breen, M. (1995). Risk communication, metacommunication, and rhetorical stases in the Aspen–EPA superfund controversy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9, 5-41.

Valenti, J. , & Wilkins, L. (1995). An ethical risk communication protocol for science and mass communication. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 177-194.

Vickers, B. (1988). In defence of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.