The popularity of technical writing and communication has caused many colleges and universities to scramble to hire qualified tenure-track faculty members. So-called lone ranger candidates are often lured to workplaces in which they are the sole technical writing faculty members by promises of autonomy and the ability to develop programs in ways, and at a pace, that would not necessarily be possible at other institutions. This article explores challenges faced by several such lone ranger faculty members and outlines survival strategies that may help lone rangers sustain and build their technical writing programs.
Amorose, T. (2000). WPA work at the small college or university: Re-imagining power and making the small school visible. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 23(3-4), 85-103.
2.
Brumberger, E. (2001). The best of times, the worst of times: One version of the “humane”lectureship. In E. Schell & P. Stock (Eds.), Moving a mountain: Transforming the role of contingent faculty in composition studies and higher education (pp. 91-106). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3.
Carnegie, T. (2003, October). Going wireless at the border. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication, Potsdam, NY.
4.
Dickson, M. (1993). Directing without power: Adventures in constructing a model of feminist writing programs administration. In S. Fontaine & S. Hunter (Eds.), Writing ourselves into the story: Unheard voices from composition studies (pp. 140-153). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
5.
Dubson, M. (2001). Introduction: “A” is for adjunct, and higher education flunks. In M. Dubson (Ed.), Ghosts in the classroom: Stories of college adjunct faculty—And the price we all pay (pp. iii-viii). Boston: Camel’s Back Books.
6.
Gunner, J. (2002). Professional advancement of the WPA: Rhetoric and politics in tenure and promotion. In I. Ward & W. Carpenter (Eds.), The Allyn & Bacon sourcebook for writing program administrators (pp. 315-330). New York: Longman.
7.
Hansen, K. (1995). Face to face with part-timers: Ethics and the professionalization of writing faculties. In J. Janangelo & K. Hansen (Eds.), Resituating writing: Constructing and administering writing programs (pp. 23-45). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
8.
Hea, A. K. (2003, October). Teaching as a conduit: An interrogation of the educative function of the untenured, sole professional writing faculty member. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication, Potsdam, NY.
9.
Howard, R. M. (1993). Power revisited: Or, how we became a department. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 16(3), 37-49.
10.
Hult, C. (1995). The scholarship of administration. In J. Janangelo & K. Hansen (Eds.), Resituating writing: Constructing and administering writing programs (pp. 119-131). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann-Boynton/Cook.
11.
Jacobson, J. (2003, March 20). The challenges of managing adjuncts. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/2003/03/2003032001c.htm
12.
Latterell, C. (2003a, October). So you’re the “writing person”: Three keys to understanding the values and cultures of small school contexts. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication, Potsdam, NY.
13.
Latterell, C. (2003b). Technical and professional communication programs and the small college setting: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33, 319-335.
14.
Launius, C. (2005). “Being” women’s studies: Perils and pleasures of administering a one-person program. NWSA Journal, 12, 178-183.
15.
MacNealy, M., & Heaton, L. (1999). Can this marriage be saved: Is an English department a good home for technical communication?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29(1), 41-64.
16.
Nardone, C. F. (2003, October). “Who are you, and what is it you do again?” Struggling for identity in small technical communication programs. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication, Potsdam, NY.
17.
Pantoja, V., Tribbensee, N., & Roen, D. (2002). Legal considerations for writing program administrators. In S. Brown & T. Enos (Eds.), The writing program administrator’s resource: A guide to reflective institutional practice (pp. 137-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Parker, W. (1967). Where do English departments come from?College English, 28, 339-351.
19.
Rash-Konneh, D. (2001, May). Trends in research and faculty preparation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Technical Communication, Chicago.
20.
Rhodes, K. (1998). Who’s the boss? The possibilities and pitfalls of collaborative administration of untenured WPAs. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 21(2-3), 65-80.
21.
Sapp, D. A. (2002). Supervising adjunct instructors: Reflections of a new, tenure-track professional writing coordinator at a small comprehensive university. In Proceedings of the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication (pp. 108-110). Logan, UT: Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication.
22.
Schell, E. (2002). Part-time/adjunct issues: Working toward change. In S. Brown & T. Enos (Eds.), The writing program administrator’s resource: Aguide to reflective institutional practice (pp. 181-201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Schell, E., & Stock, P. (2001). Working contingent faculty in[to] higher education. In E. Schell & P. Stock (Eds.), Moving a mountain: Transforming the role of contingent faculty in composition studies and higher education (pp. 1-44). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
24.
Schuster, C. (1995). Foreword. In J. Janangelo & K. Hansen (Eds.), Resituating writing: Constructing and administering writing programs (pp. ix-xiv). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann-Boynton/Cook.
25.
Stock, P., Brown, A., Franke, D., & Starkweather, J. (2001). The scholarship of teaching: Contributions from contingent faculty. In E. Schell & P. Stock (Eds.), Moving a mountain: Transforming the role of contingent faculty in composition studies and higher education (pp. 287-323). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
26.
White, E. (1991). Use it or lose it: Power and the WPA. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 15(1-2), 3-12.
27.
Wu, S. (2005). Where do faculty receive their PhDs?Academe, 91(4), 53-54.
