A set of discourse-based methods—genre theory, genre analysis, and discourse analysis—can provide a descriptive basis for a critical analysis of the multiple connections between discourse practices and their underlying concepts and categories within professions. To illustrate this theoretical and methodological project, this article analyzes prognosis in the discourse of medicine. Using Goffman’s (1959) distinction between front-stage and back-stage discourse, the author suggests that a back-stage discourse of prognosis points to problems with prognosis in the front-stage discourse of medical encounters between oncologists and patients who have been diagnosed with cancer. The analysis shows that the oral genre of treatment discussion in oncology encounters is organized to allow practitioners to do, appear to do, or avoid doing difficult work like presenting a prognosis. The article suggests that discourse-based methods have the potential to become the basis for productive critical engagement between practitioners and researchers in professional communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press .
2.
Aldrich, C. (1999). The medical interview: Gateway to the doctor-patient relationship (2nd ed.). New York: Pantheon .
3.
Barton, E. (2001). Design in observational research on the discourse of medicine: Toward disciplined interdisciplinarity . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 309-332 .
4.
Barton, E. (2002). [Cancer center pilot study]. Unpublished raw data.
5.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis .
6.
Becker, A. (1995). Beyond translation: Essays toward a modern philology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
7.
Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
8.
Berkenkotter, C. (2001). Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork . Written Communication, 18, 326-349 .
9.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
10.
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman .
11.
Billings, J., & Stoeckel, J. (1999). The clinical encounter: A guide to the medical interview and case presentation (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby .
12.
Brody, H. (1992). The healer’s power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
13.
Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news: A guide for health care professionals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press .
14.
Calabresi, P., Schein, P., & Rosenberg, S. (Eds.). (1985). Medical oncology: Basic principles and clinical management of cancer. New York: Macmillan .
15.
Cassell, E. (1976). The healer’s art. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott .
16.
Cassell, E. (1991). The nature of suffering and the goal of medicine. New York: Oxford University Press .
17.
Cassell, E. (1997). Doctoring: The nature of primary care medicine. New York: Oxford University Press .
18.
Chabner, D. (1996). The language of medicine (5th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders .
19.
Coulehan, J., & Boch, M. (2001). The medical interview: Mastering skills for clinical practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Davis .
20.
Dannels, D. (2003). Teaching and learning design presentations in engineering: Contradictions between academic and workplace activity systems . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, 139-169 .
21.
DeVita, V., Hellman, S., & Rosenberg, S. (Eds.). (1985). Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology (2nd ed.). New York: J. B. Lippincott .
22.
Devitt, A., Bawarshi, A., & Reiff, M. J. (2003). Materiality and genre in the study of discourse communities . College English, 65, 541-558 .
23.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). New York: Cambridge University Press .
24.
Dunmire, P. (2000). Genre as temporally situated social action: A study of temporality and genre activity . Written Communication, 17, 93-138 .
25.
Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
26.
Fisher, S., & Todd, A. (Eds.). (1993). The social organization of doctor-patient communication (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
27.
Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
28.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday .
29.
Groopman, J. (2002, October 28). Dying words: How should doctors deliver bad news? The New Yorker, pp. 62-70.
30.
Haskell, T. (Ed.). (1984). The authority of experts: Studies in history and theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
31.
Herndl, C. (1993). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing . College Composition and Communication, 44, 349-363 .
32.
Herndl, C. (2002). Call for papers . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, 349-349 .
33.
Herndl, C., & Nahrwold, C. (2000). Research as social practice: Acase study of research on technical and professional communication . Written Communication, 17, 258-296 .
34.
Hunter, K. (1991). Doctors’ stories: The narrative structure of medical knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
35.
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
36.
Katz, J. (2002). The silent world of doctor and patient. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press . (Original work published 1984)
37.
Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. New York: Basic Books .
38.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
39.
Larson, M. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press .
40.
Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. New York: Cambridge University Press .
41.
McCarthy, L. (1991). Apsychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 358-378). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
42.
McCarthy, L., & Gerring, J. (1994). Revising psychiatry’s charter document: DSM-IV . Written Communication, 11, 147-192 .
43.
Miller, C. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis . (Reprinted from 1984 Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167)
44.
Mishler, E. (1984). The discourse of medicine. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
45.
Nuland, S. (1993). How we die: Reflections on life’s final chapter. New York: Vintage .
46.
Paré, A., & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 146-154). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis .
47.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press .
48.
Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton .
49.
Porter, R. (1999). The greatest benefit to mankind: A medical history of humanity. New York: Norton .
50.
Quill, T. (2001). Caring for patients at the end of life: Facing an uncertain future together. New York: Oxford University Press .
51.
Reynolds, J. F., Mair, D., & Fischer, P. (1995). Writing and reading mental health records: Issues and analysis in professional writing and scientific rhetoric. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
52.
Roter, D., & Hall, J. (1992). Doctors talking to patients/patients talking to doctors. Westport, CT: Auburn House .
53.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis . Written Communication, 14, 504-554 .
54.
Schryer, C., Lingard, L., Spafford, M., & Garwood, K. (2003). Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies (pp. 62-96). Retrieved August 2, 2003, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/
55.
Segal, J., Paré, A., Brent, D., & Vipond, D. (1998). The researcher as missionary: Problems with rhetoric and reform in the disciplines . College Composition and Communication, 50, 71-90 .
56.
Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: Acentral bank’s response to its executives’ expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press .
57.
Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry. New York: Basic Books .
58.
Swales, J. (in press). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press .
59.
Waitzkin, H. (1991). The politics of medical encounters: How patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
60.
Wells, S. (1996). Sweet reason: Rhetoric and the discourses of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
61.
Wells, S. (2001). Out of the dead house: Nineteenth-century women physicians and the writing of medicine. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
62.
Wilson, J., Braunwald, E., Isselbacher, K., Petersdorf, R., Martin, J., Fauci, A., et al. (Eds.). (1991). Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill .
63.
Winsor, D. (1999). Genre and activity systems: The role of documentation in maintaining andchanging engineering activity systems . Written Communication, 16, 200-224 .
64.
Winsor, D. (2000). Ordering work: Blue-collar literacy and the political nature of genre . Written Communication, 17, 155-184 .
