Although scarcely explored to date, US patent records provide numerous opportunities for research in technical and scientific communication. This article reviews disciplinary research that taps this rich archive of information, describes ways in which patents act as moral and social barometers to technological change, and provides readers with a brief guide to basic information needed to initiate research using patent records.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, Charles. The Languages of Edison's Light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
2.
Brockmann, R. John.“Does Clio Have a Place in Technical Writing?”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication18 (1988): 297-304.
3.
Brockmann, R. John.. From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century: Explorations in a History of Technical Communication in the United States. Creskill, NJ: Hampton, 1998.
4.
Brockmann, R. John. “Oliver Evans and His Antebellum Wrestling with Rhetorical Arrangement.”Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication. Ed. Teresa C. Kynell and Michael G. Moran. Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999. 63-89.
5.
Ciarlante, Marjorie. E-mail to the author. 6 Oct. 2000.
6.
Cooper, Carolyn C.“Social Construction of Invention through Patent Management: Thomas Blanchard's Woodworking Machinery.”Technology and Culture32 (1991): 960-998.
7.
Dood, Kendall J.“Pursuing the Essence of Inventions: Reissuing Patents in the 19th Century.”Technology and Culture32 (1991): 999-1017.
8.
Dood, Kendall J. “The U.S. Patent Classification System.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-22 (1979): 95-100.
9.
Durack, Katherine T.Documentation and Domestic Technology: Household Sewing Technologies and Feminine Authority. Diss. New Mexico State University, 1998.
10.
Durack, Katherine T.“Gender, Technology, and the History of Technical Communication.”Technical Communication Quarterly6 (1997): 249-260.
11.
Durack, Katherine T. “Patterns for Success: A Lesson in Usable Design from U.S. Patent Records.” Technical Communication 44 (1997): 37-51.
12.
Durack, Katherine T.“Redefining Redefinition: What's Sexist about Technical Writing.”Council of Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication's Annual Meeting. Houghton, MI. 28-30 Sep. 1995.
13.
Guide to Federal Records in the National Archives of the United States. 30 Apr. 2001 <http://www.nara.gov/guide>.
14.
Gurak, Laura J., and Sam J. Racine. “Guest Editors’ Introduction: The Social Realms of Technology.”JBTC14 (2000): 261-263.
15.
“IBM Repeats at Top of PTO's Annual List of 10 Organizations Receiving Most Patents.”United States Patent and Trademark Office. 30 Apr. 2001 <http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/00-03.htm>.
16.
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-22, 1979.
17.
Joenk, R. J.“Patents: Incentive to Innovateand Communicate.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-22 (1979): 46-59.
18.
Kidwell, Claudia B.Cutting A Fashionable Fit: Dressmakers’ Drafting Systems in the United States. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979.
19.
Lubar, Steven. “New, Useful, and Nonobvious.”American Heritage of Invention and Technology6 (1990): 8-16.
20.
Maines, Rachel. “Socially Camouflaged Technologies: The Case of the Electromechanical Vibrator.”IEEE Technology and Society MagazineJune 1989: 3+-3+.
21.
National Archives and Records Administration. 30 Apr. 2001 <http://www.nara.gov>.
Reingold, Nathan. “U.S. Patent Office Records as Sources for the History of Invention and Technological Property.” Technology and Culture 1 (1960): 156-167.
26.
Skolnik, Herman. “Historical Aspects of Patent Systems.”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-22 (1979): 59-63.
27.
Stanley, Autumn. Mothers and Daughters of Invention: Notes for a Revised History of Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995.
28.
The Story of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Washington, DC: Patent and Trademark Office, 1988.
29.
Stross, Randall E.“Patently Absurd Claims.”U.S. News and World Report20 Mar. 2000: 56-56.
30.
United States Patent and Trademark Office. 30 Apr. 2001 <http://www.uspto.gov>.
31.
Walterscheid, Edward C.To Promote the Progress of Useful Arts: American Patent Law and Administration, 1798-1836. Littleton, CO: Rothman, 1998.
32.
Wheeler, David L.“Will DNA Patents Hinder Research? Lawyers Say Not to Worry.”The Chronicle of Higher Education16 Jul. 1999: A19-A19.
33.
“Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?”The Economist8 Apr. 2000: 17-17.
