This article turns to the concept of interdisciplinarity as a framework for the design and development of observational studies investigating the discourse of medicine in language-based fields such as linguistics, rhetoric, composition, and professional communication. It argues that observational studies be designed as disciplined interdisciplinary studies, defined as research that makes an acknowledged contribution to both medicine and language studies. It proposes two guiding principles for the design of observational studies in medicine, both of which focus on issues of prospective design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, R. D.“The Patient with Cancer: His Changing Pattern of Communication.”New England Journal of Medicine297 (1996): 317-322.
2.
Agar, Michael. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. 2nd ed.New York: Academic Press, 1996.
3.
Aldrich, C. Knight. The Medical Interview: Gateway to the Doctor-Patient Relationship. 2nd ed.New York: Parthenon, 1999.
4.
Anderson, Paul. “Ethics, Institutional Review Boards, and the Involvement of Human Participants in Composition Research.”Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy. Ed. Peter Mortensen and Gesa Kirsch. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1996. 260-285.
5.
Atkinson, Paul, and John Heritage, eds. Structures of Social Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
6.
Barton, Ellen. “Informational and Interactional Functions of Slogans and Sayings in the Discourse of a Support Group.”Discourse and Society10.4 (1999): 461-486.
7.
Barton, Ellen. “The Interactional Practices of Referrals and Accounts in Medical Discourse: Expertise and Compliance.”Discourse Studies2.3 (2000): 259-281.
8.
Barton, Ellen.“Literacy in (Inter)Action.”College English59.4 (1997): 408-437.
9.
Barton, Ellen.“Negotiating Expertise in Discourses of Disability.”Text16.3 (1996): 299-322.
10.
Barton, Ellen.“The Presence of Interlocutors vs. The Sites of the Internet: The Restricted Range of Disability Narratives.”Works and Days33/34, 35/36 v.17-18 (2000): 85-115.
11.
Barton, Ellen.“Sanctioned and Non-Sanctioned Narratives in Institutional Discourse.”Narrative Inquiry. Forthcoming.
12.
Barton, Ellen. “The Social Work of Diagnosis: Evidence for Judgments of Competence and Incompetence.”Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Ed. Dana Kovarsky, Judy Duchan, and Madeline Maxell. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999. 257-290.
13.
Barton, Ellen.“Textual Practices of Erasure: Representations of Disability and the Founding of the United Way.”Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture. Ed. James Wilson and Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, Forthcoming.
14.
Bazerman, Charles. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.
15.
Browman, George. “Editorial: Science, Language, Intuition, and the Many Meanings of Quality of Life.”Journal of Clinical Oncology17 (1999): 1651-1653.
16.
Chaput de Saintange, D. Mark, and Duncan Vere. Current Problems in Clinical Trials. Oxford, Eng.: Blackwell Scientific, 1984.
17.
Cicourel, Aaron. “The Reproduction of Objective Knowledge.”The Knowledge Society. Ed. G. Bohme and N. Stehr. Dordrecht, Neth.: Reidel, 1986. 87-122.
18.
Cross, Geoffrey. Collaboration and Conflict: A Contextual Exploration of Group Writing and Positive Emphasis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton, 1994.
19.
Dautermann, Jennie. Writing at Good Hope: A Study of Negotiated Composition in a Community of Nurses. Greenwich, CT: Ablex, 1997.
20.
Denzin, Norman, and Yvonna Lincoln, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.
21.
Doheny-Farina, Stephen. “Creating a Text/Creating a Company: The Role of a Text in the Rise and Decline of a New Organization.”Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Ed. Charles Bazerman and James Paradis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. 306-335.
22.
Faigley, Lester. “Nonacademic Writing: The Social Perspective.”Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Ed. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 231-248.
23.
Frankel, Richard. “Medicine at the Millennium: Research on Language, Social Interaction, and Outcomes of Care.”Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (GURT 2000): Linguistics, Language, and the Professions, Washington, DC. 6 May 2000.
24.
Geertz, Clifford. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
25.
Giacomini, Mita, and Deborah Cook. “Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature XXIII. Qualitative Research in Health Care B: What Are the Results and How Do They Help Me Care for My Patients?”Journal of the American Medical Association284 (2000): 478-482.
26.
Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
27.
Hornblum, Allan. Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg Prison: A True Story of Abuse and Exploitation in the Name of Medical Science. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1998.
28.
Kahn, C. Ronald. “Sounding Board: Picking a Research Problem.”The New England Journal of Medicine295 (1994): 1530-1533.
29.
Key, Philip. Communicating with Patients. London: Croom Helm, 1988.
30.
Klein, Julie. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1990.
31.
Kleinman, Arthur. Writing at the Margin: Discourse between Anthropology and Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
32.
Ley, Philip. Communicating with Patients: Improving Communication Satisfaction and Compliance. New York: Croom Helm, 1988.
33.
Lipkin, Mack, Samuel Putnam, and Aaron Lazare, eds. The Medical Interview. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
34.
MacDonald, Susan Peck. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994.
35.
McCarthy, Lucille. “A Psychiatrist Using DSM-III: The Influence of a Charter Document in Psychiatry.”Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Ed. Charles Bazerman and James Paradis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. 358-378.
36.
Mishler, Elliot. The Discourse of Medicine. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.
37.
Muller-Hill, Bruno. Murderous Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
38.
Ness, D. E., and R. Meadow. “Denial in the Medical Interview.”Journal of the American Medical Association272 (1994): 1777-1781.
39.
Odell, Lee. “Beyond the Text: Relations between Writing and Social Context.”Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Ed. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 249-280.
40.
Odell, Lee, Dixie Goswami, and Anne Herrington. “The Discourse Based Interview.”Research on Writing: Principles and Methods. Ed. Peter Mosenthal, Lynn Tamor, and Sean Walmsley. New York: Longman, 1983. 220-235.
41.
Paradis, James, David Dobrin, and Richard Miller. “Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the Writing Environment of an R&D Organization.”Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Ed. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 281-307.
42.
Quill, Timothy, and Penelope Townsend. “Bad News: Delivery, Dialogue, and Dilemmas.”Archives of Internal Medicine151 (1991): 463-468.
43.
Reverby, Susan, and James Jones, eds. Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
44.
Reynolds, John, David Mair, and Pamela Fischer. Writing and Reading Mental Health Records: Issues and Analysis in Professional Writing and Scientific Rhetoric. 2nd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
45.
Russo, Francine. “The Clinical-Trials Bottleneck.”The Atlantic MonthlyMay 1999: 30-36.
46.
Segal, Judy. “Patient Compliance, the Rhetoric of Rhetoric, and the Rhetoric of Persuasion.”Rhetoric Society Quarterly23.3-4 (1993): 90-102.
47.
Segal, Judy.“Writing and Medicine: Text and Context.”Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Ed. Rachel Spilka. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993. 84-97.
48.
Simon, Richard. “Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials.”Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 2nd ed. Ed. Vincent DeVita, Samuel Hellman, and Steven Rosenberg. New York: Lippincott, 1985. 330-350.
49.
Smart, Graham. “Genre as Community Invention: A Central Bank's Response to Its Executives’ Expectations as Readers.”Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Ed. Rachel Spilka. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993. 124-140.
50.
Spilker, Bert, and Joyce Cramer. Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven, 1992.
51.
Squires, Geoffrey, Helen Simons, Malcolm Parlett, and Tony Becher. Interdisciplinarity. London: Nuffield Foundation, 1979.
52.
Starr, Paul. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
53.
Winsor, Dorothy. “Blue-Collar Literacy and the Political Nature of Genre.”Written Communication17 (2000): 155-184.
54.
Winsor, Dorothy.Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.
