This landmark study took place over a four year period of time and included 9,105 seriously ill hospitalized clients and their physicians. Its main objective was to improve end of life decision making and reduce the frequency of painful, mechanically supported, prolonged patterns of dying. Findings indicate that despite well planned, comprehensive interventions to improve study outcomes, clients in the intervention group fared no better than their counterparts in the control group. These findings have serious implications for those working in hospice and palliative care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
deBlois S: Changing the way we care for the dying. Health Progress. 1994;75 (2): 48, 49, 52.
2.
Field D: Palliative medicine and the medicalization of death. European Journal of Cancer Care. 1994;3:58-62.
3.
Kass LR: Is there a right to die?Hastings Center Report. 1993; Jan/Feb: 34-43.
4.
Thorpe G: Enabling more dying people to remain at home. British Medical Journal. 1993;307:915-918.
5.
Baer K: A guide to hospice care. Harvard Health Letter. 1993; April: 9-12.
6.
Hayslip B, Leon J: Hospice Care. London: Sage Publications. 1992.
7.
Olweny CL: Ethics of palliative care medicine: Palliative care for the rich nations only! Journal of Palliative Care. 1994;10 (3): 17-22.
8.
McCuistion PO: Increasing minority access to hospice care. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1994;11 (5): 19-21.
9.
Neubauer BJ, Hamilton CL: Racial differences in attitudes toward hospice care. The Hospice Journal. 1990;6 (1): 37-48.
10.
Callahan D: Pursuing a peaceful death. Hastings Center Report. 1993; July-Aug: 33-38.
11.
Gochman DS, Bonham GS: The social structure of the hospice decision. The Hospice Journal. 1990;6 (1): 15-35.
12.
Abyad A: Palliative care: The future. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1 993;10 (6): 23-28.
13.
Bulkin W, Lukashok H: Training physicians to care for the dying. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1991;8 (2): 10-15.
14.
Fletcher WS: ‘Doctor, am I terminal?’Emergency Medicine. 1992;24 (10): 155-159.
15.
Prigerson HG: Determinants of hospice utilization among terminally ill geriatric patients. Home Health care Services Quarterly. 1991;12 (4): 81-112.
16.
Reddall C: People with cancer have the right to expect the best possible treatment and care. European Journal of Cancer Care. 1994;3:39-43.
17.
Wall E, Rodriguez G, Saultz J: A retrospective study of patient care needs on admission to an inpatient hospice facility. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 1993;6:233-238.
18.
Bulkin, op. cit.
19.
Baer, op. cit.
20.
Brooks S: A descriptive study of the decision-making process used by oncologists in the prognosis of terminal illness and certification of a patient for hospice. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, 1987). University Microfilms International 8714951.
21.
Gochman DS, Bonham GS: Physicians and the hospice decision: Awareness, discussion, reasons and satisfaction. The Hospice Journal. 1988;4 (1): 25-52.
22.
Hyman RB, Bulkin W: Physician reported incentives and disincentives for referring patients to hospice. The Hospice Journal. 1990;6 (4): 39-59.
23.
Forster LE, Lynn J: Predicting life span for applicants to inpatient hospice. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1988;148:2540-2543.
24.
Forster LE, Lynn J: The use of physiologic measures and demographic variables to predict longevity among inpatient hospice applicants. The American Journal of Hospice Care. 1989, 6 (2): 31-34.
25.
Gochman, op. cit.
26.
Hyman, op. cit.
27.
Prigerson, op. cit.
28.
Ibid.
29.
Jonas S: Hospice—Are we a dumping ground?The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1993;10 (6): 7-8.
30.
DeVito RA: Hospice and managed care: The new frontier. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1995;12 (4): 2.
31.
Abyad, op. cit.
32.
Addington-Hall JM: Dying from cancer: The views of bereaved family and friends about the experiences of terminally ill patients. Palliative Medicine. 1991;5:207-214.
33.
Dawson NJ: Need satisfaction in terminal care settings. Social Science and Medicine. 1991;32 (1): 83-87
34.
Field D, Dand P, Ahmedzai S, Biswas B: Lay carers of patients admitted to a hospice: How caring restricts their lives. Health & Social Care. 1993;1 (3): 161-168.
35.
Greer DS, Mor V, Morris JN, Shrwood S, Kidder D, Birnbaum H: An alternative in terminal care: Results of the national hospice study. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1986;39 (1): 9-26.
36.
James N, Field D: The routinization of hospice: Charisma and bureaucratization. Social Science and Medicine. 1992;34 (12): 1363-1375.
37.
Wallston KA, Burger C, Smith RA, Baugher RJ: Comparing the quality of death for hospice and non-hospice cancer patients. Medical Care. 1988;26 (2): 177-182.
38.
Wiest JV: The hospice advantage. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1993;10 (6): 12-15.
39.
Abyad, op. cit.
40.
Baer, op. cit.
41.
Byock IR: Ethics from a hospice perspective. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1994;11 (4): 9-11.
42.
Dunlop RJ, Davies RJ, Hockley JM: Preferred versus actual place of death: A hospital palliative care support team experience. Palliative Medicine. 1989;3:197-201.
43.
Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA: Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1989;4:23-29.
44.
Huntington SR: New provider responsibilities under the patient self-determination act. Caring. 1991;10(9): 20-25.
45.
Jamison JE: Spirituality and medical ethics. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1995;12 (3): 41-45.
46.
Martin JP: Making terminal care decisions. Caring1991, 10 (7): 42-45.
47.
Mueller-Marquez BJ: Is there congruence in hospice nurses’ view of their patients’ quality of life and their hospice patients’ view of their own quality of life?The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1993;10 (5): 5 -6.
48.
Taylor SL. Quandary at the crossroads: paternalism versus advocacy surrounding end-of-treatment decisions. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1995;12 (4): 43-46.
49.
Faulkner A, Regnard C: Handling difficult questions in palliative care—a flow diagram. Palliative Medicine. 1994;8245-250.
50.
Gochman, 1990, op. cit.
51.
Baer, op. cit.
52.
Bennett M, Corcoran G: The impact on community palliative care services of a hospital palliative care team. Palliative Medicine. 1994;8 (3): 237-244.
53.
Bloom BS, Amenta MO: Prospective payment and the Medicare hospice benefit. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 1993;10 (2): 32-39.
54.
Greer, op. cit.
55.
Morgan AK, Lindley CM, Berry JI: Assessment of pain and patterns of analgesic use in hospice patients. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 199411 (1): 13-25.
56.
Abyad, op. cit.
57.
Aiken LH: Evaluation research and public policy: Lessons from the national hospice study. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1986;39 (1): 1-4.
58.
Baer, op. cit.
59.
Bloom, op. cit.
60.
Dush DM: High-Tech, aggressive palliative care: In the service of quality of life. Journal of Palliative Care. 1993, 9 (1): 37-41.
61.
Greer, op. cit.
62.
Wiest, op. cit.
63.
Bloom, op. cit.
64.
Townsend J, Frank AO, Fermont D, Dyer S, Karran O, Walgrove A, Piper M: Terminal cancer care and patients’ preference for place of death: A prospective study. British Medical Journal. 1990;301:415-417.
65.
Wallston, op. cit.
66.
Byock, op. cit.
67.
Olweny, op. cit.
68.
Starzomski R: Ethical issues in palliative care: The case of dialysis and organ transplantation. Journal of Palliative Care. 1994;10 (3): 27-34.
69.
Ende, op. cit.
70.
Blackhall, L, Murphy S, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S: Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995; Sept 13, 274 (10): 820-825.
71.
Taylor, op. cit.
72.
SUPPORT Principal Investigators: A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1995;274 (20): 1591-1598.
