du Boulay S, Saunders C: The founder of the modern hospice movement. Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1984:172-172
2.
Ibidem:86
3.
Ibidem:90-91
4.
Ibidem:174
5.
Saunders C: Personal communication, 1978
6.
Saunders C: Hospice and palliative care: An interdisciplinary approach. Edward Arnold, London, 1990
7.
du Boulay S: ibidem:1OO
8.
Bettetheim B: Home for the heart. Thames and Hudson. Cited in du Boulay, ibidem: 135, 1974
9.
du Boulay: Ibidem:126
10.
Ibidem: 126-127
11.
Potter IF: Achallenge for the hospice movement. NEIM, 1980;302:53-55
12.
Paradis LF, Usui WM: Hospice volunteers: The impact of personality characteristics on retention and job performance, The Hospice J, 1987;3(1):3-30
13.
Ahmedza, S: Invited review for Mor V, Masterson-Allen S. Acomparison ofhospice vs conventional care of the terminally ill cancer patient. Oncology, 1990;July:94-96
14.
Mor V, Masterson-Allen S: Acomparison of hospice vs conventional care of the terminally ill cancer patient. Oncology, 1990;July:85-91
15.
Selinske C: Personal communication: Results of informal survey of New York State Hospice directors, March 1992
16.
Pye R: The First International Hospice Conference in India. West Australia Palliative Care Newsletter, 1991;38:6-6
17.
Bonnyman G: Moral malpractice. Sojourners, 1992;21(3):12-17
18.
Equal access to health care: Patient dumping. A hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representations. 100th Congress1987;July22:14-16
19.
Hill ZM: Testimony before the Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations. 1987;22 July: 17-17
20.
The Wall Street Journal, 1988;29 Nov: 1-1
21.
Children's Defense Fund, The Health of America's Children: Maternal and Child Health Data Book. Washington DC, 1989;18-18
22.
Congress Research Service, Library of Congress, Health Insurance and the Uninsured: Background data and analysis. Energy and Commerce Committee Print No. 100-X, Washington, DC, 1988
23.
U.S. Bipartisan Commission on Comprehensive Health Care (The Pepper Commission), Final Report: A call to action. Washington, DC, 1990:21-23
24.
Office of Management and Budget: “ Introductory Statement: The Problem of Rising Health Care Costs,” presented before the Senate Finance Committee, 1992;16 April:6-8
25.
Farley P: National Health Care Expenditures Study: Who are theunderinsured? National Center for Health Services Research, Washington. DC 1984:20-20
American Cancer Society: Cancer and the poor: A report to the Nation, Atlanta GA, 1990:7-7
28.
Peden E, Lee M: Output and inflation components of medical care and other spending changes. Health Care Financing Review, 1991;l4(2):75-81
29.
Bipartisan Commission on Comprehensive Health Care (The Pepper Commission), Final Report: A call to action. Washington DC 1990:38-38
30.
Families USA Foundation: The growing threat to the family Budget. Washington, DC, 1991
31.
Bonnyman O: Results of July 1992 survey of the states. Personal communication with Super D. Attorney, The National Health Law Program, Washington, DC
32.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Center for the Study of the States, The States and the Poor: How budget decisions in 1991 affect low income people. Washington, DC, 1991:31-44
33.
U.S. Bipartisan Commission on Comprehensive Health Care (The Pepper Commission), Final Report: A call to action. Washington, DC, 1990:42-42,43-43
34.
USA Today: How stock funds performed last year, 1991;7 Jan:3B-3B
35.
Pope G, Schneider J: Trends in physician income health affairs, 1992;ll(l):181-194
36.
Rich S: Washington Post, 21 May 1992
37.
Woolhandler S, Himmelstein D: The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the U.S. Health Care System. NEJM, 1991; 324:1253-1258
38.
U.S. General Accounting Office: Canadian Health Insurance: Lessons for the US, GAOIHRD-91-90, Washington, DC, US Govt Printing Off, June 1990
39.
American Hospital Association: Hospital Statistics, 1985 edition. Chicago, 111, 1985
40.
Ginsburg P.Koretz D: Bed availability and hospital utilization: Estimates of the ‘Roemer Effect.’ Health Care Financing Review, 1983;5(l):87-92
