Abstract
Background
Health systems increasingly recognize the value of community-based palliative care but there is considerable variability in how such services are delivered. As part of a quality improvement initiative to enhance community-based palliative care, we aimed to characterize publicly accessible services for persons suffering from serious illness in a diverse, large North American city in Canada. We assessed the degree to which structures and processes followed best-practice recommendations of high-quality community-based palliative care.
Methodology
We conducted a cross-sectional survey with healthcare workers to assess structures and processes related to community-based palliative care team composition, care access and provision, care continuity, and care transitions.
Results
Community-based palliative care teams in our sample adhered to many best-practice recommendations, such as working in multi-disciplinary teams, providing 24/7 access, and fostering care transitions to and from inpatient palliative care settings. However, access to community-based palliative care was not uniform, and considerable variability existed in prognostic admission criteria. We also identified gaps in psycho-spiritual and personal care support capacity. Specialized, dedicated psycho-spiritual, and personal care support services were missing from more than 75% of community-based palliative care teams.
Conclusions
A survey of structures and processes in community-based palliative care teams revealed variability in service organization and care processes. Many services lacked psycho-spiritual and personal care support. Our findings may be representative of similar structural issues elsewhere and suggest the need for broader efforts to understand the system-level factors that shape community-based palliative care service structures and processes.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
