Abstract
Background
Breathlessness is a distressing and prevalent symptom in fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Dyspnea management requires systematic assessment including patients’ lived experiences; however, most dyspnea tools are point-in-time numerical severity scales. The Edmonton Dyspnea Inventory was developed to assess severity at rest, during activities of daily living and self-reported activities. It enables documentation of crisis dyspnea episodes and triggers clinicians to guide action plans and dyspnea management. This study is part of a larger project to validate the tool. The purpose was to describe patient perceptions of assessment of breathlessness of patient use of the tool.
Methods
Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease were invited to share their perceptions and experiences of breathlessness and the tool. Focus groups were led on Zoom©, with patient-participants in their homes. Data were analysed with inductive content analysis for development of themes.
Results
Thirteen patients participated in 2 focus groups. There were 4 major themes, each with minor themes: physicians need to explicitly ask about breathlessness; the tool conveys breathlessness and disease progression; the tool increases self-awareness of breathlessness and complexity; and the tool helps prevent crises and manage breathlessness. Patient-participants perceived the tool provided the needed language and means to focus and relay their breathlessness to others.
Conclusion
Patient-participants reported the tool was easy to understand and integrate in daily living. They recommended its use for general and specialized practitioners. Developed to assess breathlessness, the tool may provide a framework to promote patient self-awareness, describe individual progression, and tailor breathlessness self-management.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
