Current palliative care training in medical school is inadequate in preparing doctors to provide quality palliative care. Little attention is paid to determining effective methods of training.
Objective
To assess the use of bite-sized animations in improving the confidence, knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards palliative care.
Methods
A mixed methods cohort study was adopted for the study. 50 medical students without prior palliative training completed questionnaires before and after watching a 12-part animated palliative care video series called PowerFacts. Of these participants, 18 underwent semi-structured interviews.
Results
The quantitative results showed that animations are effective in improving the confidence (P < .001) and knowledge (P < .001), but not the attitudes (P = .183) of medical students. Confidence, knowledge and attitudes were not correlated. Analysis of follow-up interviews of a convenience sample of participants showed that animations can be effective in teaching knowledge and does fill some gaps in palliative education for medical undergraduates. However, the content delivered as a sole learning tool is inadequate in preparing medical students for clinical practice.
Conclusion
All participants achieved level 1 (reaction), some achieved level 2 (learning) but most did not achieve level 3 (behaviour) of the Kirkpatrick’s model. There is a need for a multimodal approach in the comprehensive teaching of palliative care in undergraduate medical training to achieve all four levels of the Kirkpatrick Model.
PietersJDolmansDHJMVerstegenDMLWarmenhovenFCCourtensAMvan den Beuken-van EverdingenMHJ. Palliative care education in the undergraduate medical curricula: students’ views on the importance of, their confidence in, and knowledge of palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12904-019-0458-x
5.
GibbinsJMcCoubrieRForbesK. Why are newly qualified doctors unprepared to care for patients at the end of life?Med Educ. 2011;45(4):389-399. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03873.x
GohELeeC. A workforce to be reckoned with: the emerging pivotal generation Z hospitality workforce. Int J Hosp Manag. 2018;73:20-28. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.016
8.
ChuntaKShellenbargerTChiccaJ. Generation Z students in the online environment: strategies for nurse educators. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(2):87-91. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000872
9.
RaoMP. Animations in medical education: you can do it. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2012;5(1):18. doi:10.4103/0975-2870.97502
10.
RuizJGCookDALevinsonAJ. Computer animations in medical education: a critical literature review. Med Educ. 2009;43(9):838-846. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03429.x
11.
LoweRBoucheixJM. A composition approach to design of educational animations. In: LoweRPloetznerR, eds. Learning from Dynamic Visualization. Charm: Springer; 2017:5-30.
12.
AdamMChenSFAmievaM, et al.The use of short, animated, patient-centered springboard videos to underscore the clinical relevance of preclinical medical student education. Acad Med. 2017;92(7):961-965. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001574
13.
SullivanAMLakomaMDBlockSD. The status of medical education in end-of-life care: a national report. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):685-695. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21215.x
14.
PhuaJKeeACTanA, et al.End-of-life care in the general wards of a Singaporean hospital: an Asian perspective. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(12):1296-1301. doi:10.1089/jpm.2011.0215
15.
BillingsJABlockS. Palliative care in undergraduate medical education. Status report and future directions. JAMA. 1997;278(9):733-738.
16.
StjernswärdJFoleyKMFerrisFD. The public health strategy for palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33(5):486-493. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.016
17.
LewisCReidJMcLernonZInghamRTraynorM. The impact of a simulated intervention on attitudes of undergraduate nursing and medical students towards end of life care provision. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15:67. doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0143-2
18.
KirkpatrickDL. The four levels of evaluation. In: BrownSMSeidnerCJ, eds. Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, Vol. 46. Dordrecht: Springer; 1998:95-112.
19.
FrommeltKH. The effects of death education on nurses' attitudes toward caring for terminally ill persons and their families. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1991;8(5):37-43. doi:10.1177/104990919100800509
20.
BraunVClarkeVHayfieldN. ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qual Res Psychol. 2022;19(2):424-445. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
21.
Upson-TaboasCFMontoyaRO’LoughlinVD. Impact of cardiovascular embryology animations on short-term learning. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(1):55-65. doi:10.1152/advan.00121.2018
22.
BatesR. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Eval Progr Plann. 2004;27:341-347. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.011
23.
KrautheimVSchmitzABenzeG, et al.Self-confidence and knowledge of German ICU physicians in palliative care – a multicentre prospective study. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(1):57. doi:10.1186/s12904-017-0244-6
24.
WilsonOAvalosGDowlingM. Knowledge of palliative care and attitudes towards nursing the dying patient. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(11):600-605. doi:10.12968/bjon.2016.25.11.600
25.
KimJSKimJGelegjamtsD. Knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy towards palliative care among nurses in Mongolia: a cross-sectional descriptive study. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0236390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236390
26.
TannenA. Communication skills training for health professionals working with people who have cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(6):476-477. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000210
27.
KirkpatrickAJCantrellMASmeltzerSC. Relationships among nursing student palliative care knowledge, experience, self-awareness, and performance: an end-of-life simulation study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;73:23-30. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.003
28.
KumarSPJimASisodiaV. Effects of palliative care training program on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and experiences among student physiotherapists: a preliminary quasi-experimental study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011;17(1):47-53. doi:10.4103/0973-1075.78449
29.
KassaHMuruganRZewduFHailuMWoldeyohannesD. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice and associated factors towards palliative care among nurses working in selected hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13(1):6. doi:10.1186/1472-684x-13-6
30.
HaddockGMaioGRArnoldKHuskinsonT. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34(6):769-778. doi:10.1177/0146167208314871
31.
HwangITamMLamSLLamP. Review of use of animation as a supplementary learning material of physiology content in four academic years. Electron J E-Learn; 2012. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:43991844.
32.
GeorgeSMoranEDuranNJendersRA. Using animation as an information tool to advance health research literacy among minority participants. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013;2013:475-484. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24551351/
33.
KrishnanSDalvieS. From unwanted pregnancy to safe abortion: sharing information about abortion in Asia through animation. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):126-135. doi:10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.013
34.
PraveenCKSrinivasanK. Psychological impact and influence of animation on viewer's visual attention and cognition: a systematic literature review, open challenges, and future research directions. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:8802542. doi:10.1155/2022/8802542
35.
LoweRK. Animation and learning: value for money?Paper presented at: Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21stASCILITE Conference; December 5-8, 2004; Perth, Australia. Accessed December 12, 2023.https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/perth04/procs/pdf/lowe-r.pdf
36.
BrownBGaoCWindishDMoellerJO'NeillESoaresS. Becoming clinician-animators: a toolkit and pilot study for novel animated content development in a medical education curriculum. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(2):977-988. doi:10.1007/s40670-020-00959-4
37.
VitaGD. Learning Styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural classroom: a business and management perspective. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2001;38:165-174. doi:10.1080/14703290110035437
38.
BavishiPBirnhakAGaughanJMitchell-WilliamsJPhadtareS. Active learning: a shift from passive learning to student engagement improves understanding and contextualization of nutrition and community health. Educ Sci. 2022;12(7):430. doi:10.3390/educsci12070430
39.
GengXChenZLamWZhengQ. Hedonic evaluation over short and long retention intervals: the mechanism of the peak-end rule. J Behav Decis Mak. 2013;26:225-236. doi:10.1002/bdm.1755
40.
YardleySDornanT. Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence. Med Educ. 2012;46(1):97-106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x
41.
HorowitzRGramlingRQuillT. Palliative care education in U.S. medical schools. Med Educ. 2014;48(1):59-66. doi:10.1111/medu.12292
42.
MillerSCLimaJCThompsonSA. End-of-life care in nursing homes with greater versus less palliative care knowledge and practice. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(6):527-534. doi:10.1089/jpm.2014.0393
43.
PelayoMCebriánDAreosaAAgraYIzquierdoJVBuendíaF. Effects of online palliative care training on knowledge, attitude and satisfaction of primary care physicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:37. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-37
44.
CliffJL. Generation Z College Students’ Self-Perceived Competence, Relatedness, Autonomy and Their Academic Engagement[PhD Thesis]. Phoenix, Arizona, US: Grand Canyon University; 2020.
45.
LiuMH. Blending a class video blog to optimize student learning outcomes in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2016;30:44-53. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.001
46.
DongCGohPS. Twelve tips for the effective use of videos in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):140-145. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.943709
47.
WuHKLeeSWYChangHYLiangJC. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ. 2013;62:41-49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
