Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an expensive and scarce life sustaining treatment provided to certain critically ill patients. Little is known about the informed consent process for ECMO or clinician viewpoints on ethical complexities related to ECMO in practice.
Methods:
We sent a cross-sectional survey to all departments providing ECMO within 7 United States hospitals in January 2021. One clinician from each department completed the 42-item survey representing their department.
Results:
Fourteen departments within 7 hospitals responded (response rate 78%, N = 14/18). The mean time spent consenting patients or surrogate decision-makers for ECMO varied, from 7.5 minutes (95% CI 5-10) for unstable patients to 20 minutes (95% CI 15-30) for stable patients (p = 0.0001). Few clinician respondents (29%) report patients or surrogate decision-makers always possess informed consent for ECMO. Most departments (92%) have absolute exclusion criteria for ECMO such as older age (43%, cutoffs ranging from 60-75 years), active malignancy (36%), and elevated body mass index (29%). A significant minority of departments (29%) do not always offer the option to withdraw ECMO to patients or surrogate decision-makers. For patients who cannot be liberated from ECMO and are ineligible for heart or lung transplant, 36% of departments would recommend the patient be removed from ECMO and 64% would continue ECMO support.
Conclusion:
Adequate informed consent for ECMO is a major ethical challenge, and the content of these discussions varies. Use of categorical exclusion criteria and withdrawal of ECMO if a patient cannot be liberated from it differ among departments and institutions.
McCarthyFHMcDermottKMKiniV, et al.Trends in U.S. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use and outcomes: 2002-2012 [Internet]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;27(2):81–88. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780346/
2.
KimSJHanKSLeeEJLeeSJLeeJSLeeSW. Association between extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and mortality in the patients with cardiac arrest: a nation-wide population-based study with propensity score matched analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3703.
3.
ZangrilloALandoniGBiondi-ZoccaiG, et al.A meta-analysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc. 2013;15(3):172–178.
SchmidtMZogheibERozéH, et al.The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(10):1704–1713.
PeekGJMugfordMTiruvoipatiR, et al.Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial [Internet]. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351–1363. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61069-2/abstract
10.
AmCRobinsonEMFeinsK, et al.Ethics committee consultation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [Internet]. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(9):1553–1558. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.rush.edu/27299991/
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeRPayneJGonzalezNCondeJG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support [Internet]. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. Accessed October 10, 2020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046408001226
ArtinoARLa RochelleJSDezeeKJGehlbachH.Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–474.
16.
HallockJLRiosRHandaVL. Patient satisfaction and informed consent for surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):181.e1–181.e7.
17.
D’SouzaRSJohnsonRLBettiniLSchultePJBurkleC. Room for improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the informed consent process for emergency surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(9):1786–1798.
18.
JonsenARSieglerMWinsladeWJ. Preferences of patients [Internet]. In: Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015; Accessed February 9, 2021. accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1112266018
19.
AngelosP. Interventions to improve informed consent: perhaps surgeons should speak less and listen more. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):13–14.
20.
AngelosP. Informed consent requires the patient have the opportunity to be informed. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(6):1611–1612.
21.
AngelosP. How SURPAS may improve the surgical informed consent process. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(6):1033–1034.
22.
CocanourCS. Informed consent-it’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):993–997.
23.
HansonMPittD. Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg. 2017;60(1):69–70.
24.
LinY-KLiuK-TChenC-W, et al.How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):8.
25.
BassonMD. Medical resources are scarce, but theories about their allocation are not. Surgery. 2020;168(3):392–393.
26.
ChristianMDSprungCLKingMA, et al.Triage: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest. 2014;146(4 suppl):e61S–74S.
27.
ShekarKBadulakJPeekG, et al.Extracorporeal life support organization coronavirus disease 2019 interim guidelines: a consensus document from an international group of interdisciplinary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation providers [Internet]. ASAIO J. 2020;66(7):707–721. Accessed August 1, 2021. https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001193
28.
PiscitelloGMKapaniaEMMillerWDRojasJCSieglerMParkerWF. Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by US state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2012606.
29.
EmanuelEJPersadGUpshurR, et al.Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2049–2055.
30.
MarkNMRaynerSGLeeNJCurtisJR. Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1572–1585.
31.
JonsenARSieglerMWinsladeWJ. Medical indications[Internet]. In: Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015; Accessed February 10, 2021. accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1112265677
32.
WilsonMEAzoulayE. The ethics of withholding and withdrawing mechanical ventilation. In: TobinMJ, ed. Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation [Internet]. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2013; Chapter 66. Accessed February 10, 2021. accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=57081909
33.
ChristianMDDevereauxAVDichterJRRubinsonLKissoonN. Introduction and executive summary: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement [Internet]. CHEST. 2014;146(4):8S–34S. Accessed April 1, 2020. https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(15)51985-5/abstract
34.
CohenIGCrespoAMWhiteDB. Potential legal liability for withdrawing or withholding ventilators during COVID-19: assessing the risks and identifying needed reforms [Internet]. JAMA. 2020; Accessed April 2, 2020. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2764239
35.
DeMartinoESBrausNASulmasyDP, et al.Decisions to withdraw extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: patient characteristics and ethical considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(4):620–627.
36.
TruogRDThiagarajanRRHarrisonCH. Ethical dilemmas with the use of ECMO as a bridge to transplantation. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(8):597–598.
37.
KingLPSiminoffLAMeyerDM, et al.Health insurance and cardiac transplantation: a call for reform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(9):1388–1391.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
