Advance care planning (ACP) can improve patients’ outcomes at end of life, and interprofessional collaboration has been recommended to facilitate ACP. However, role confusion in ACP facilitation among team members from different disciplines exists, and health professional disciplines’ expectations for interprofessional collaboration in ACP are unclear.
Objective:
To review expectations of major health professional organizations for ACP competencies, in order to identify gaps and opportunities for promoting interprofessional collaboration in ACP facilitation.
Methods:
Guidelines and recommendations for ACP across disciplines including chaplaincy, medicine, nursing, psychology, and social work were identified and analyzed using content analysis. Main themes were then reviewed against national consensus statements on 4 ACP outcomes (process outcomes, action outcomes, quality of care outcomes, and healthcare outcomes) and mapped into existing domains for interprofessional education competency: values/ethics, roles/responsibilities, interprofessional communication, and teams and teamwork.
Results:
Three major content themes were identified: professional commitment to advocating for patients’ values and self-determination, professional responsibility to facilitate ACP, and specific tasks in ACP. These themes addressed mostly process and action outcomes of ACP but not quality of care outcomes or healthcare outcomes. Few disciplines included interprofessional collaboration as part of ACP competency.
Conclusion:
There is a need for standardized competency guidelines for interprofessional collaboration in ACP as an important first step in reducing confusion among roles and other challenges in facilitating ACP. Further efforts in practice, research, and policy are needed to facilitate interprofessional ACP, achieve competencies, and improve patients’ outcomes.
SudoreRLLumHDYouJJ, et al.Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017:53(5):821–832. e1.
2.
ChiarchiaroJBuddadhumarukPArnoldRMWhiteDB. Prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict among surrogates for critically ill patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(10):1528–1533.
3.
DeteringKMHancockADReadeMCSilvesterW. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345.
4.
ClarkMAPersonSDGoslineAGawancheAABlockSD. Racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning: results of a statewide population-based survey. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(8):1078–1085.
5.
JohnsonKSKuchibhatlaMTulskyJA. What explains racial differences in the use of advance directives and attitudes toward hospice care?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(10):1953–1958.
6.
SilveiraMJKimSYHLangaKM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211–1218.
7.
BarnatoAE. Challenges in understanding and respecting patients’ preferences. Health Aff. 2017;36(7):1252–1257.
8.
FulmerTEscobadoMBermanAKorenMJHernándezSHultA. Physicians’ views on advance care planning and end-of-life care conversations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(6):1201–1205.
9.
ChanCWHNgNHYChanHYLWongMMHChowKM. A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):362.
10.
Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. The National Academies Press; 2015.
11.
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. 4th ed. National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care; Published 2018. https://www.nationalcoalitionhpc.org/ncp
12.
Nedjat-HaiemFRCarrionIVGonzalezKEllKThompsonBMishraSI. Exploring health care providers’ views about initiating end-of-life care communication. Am J Hospice Palliat Med. 2017;34(4):308–317.
13.
HealeRRietzeLHillLRolesS. Development of nurse practitioner competencies for advance care planning. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018;20(2):166–171.
14.
GeshellLBrittKKimMKimAHasanSLuuA.An integrative literature review on advance care planning across health professions: knowledge, skills, & attitude. Poster presented at: 2nd Annual Interprofessional Health Showcase; May 2020.
15.
ArnettKSudoreRLNowelsDFengCXLevyCRLumHD. Advance care planning: understanding clinical routines and experiences of interprofessional team members in diverse health care settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2017;34(10):946–953.
16.
BondCJLowtonK. Geriatricians’ views of advance decisions and their use in clinical care in England: qualitative study. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):450–456.
17.
BeckERMcIlfatrickSHassonFLeaveyG. Nursing home manager’s knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about advance care planning for people with dementia in long-term care settings: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(17-18):2633–2645.
18.
BadzekLALeslieNSchwertfegerRUDeiriggiPGloverJFriendL. Advanced care planning: a study on home health nurses. Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19(2):56–62.
19.
SumserBRemkeSLeimenaMAltilioTOtis-GreenS. The serendipitous survey: a look at primary and specialist palliative social work practice, preparation, and competence. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(10):881–883.
20.
LaceyD. Nursing home social worker skills and end-of-life planning. Soc Work Health Care. 2005;40(4):19–40.
21.
SteinGLCagleJGChristGH. Social work involvement in advance care planning: findings from a large survey of social workers in hospice and palliative care settings. J Palliat Med. 2017;20(3):253–259.
22.
HirakawaYChiangCUemuraMYAoyamaA. Involvement of Japanese care managers and social workers in advance care planning. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2018;14(4):315–327.
23.
BlackK. Advance directive communications practices: social worker’s contributions to the interdisciplinary health care team. Soc Work Health Care. 2005;40(3):39–55.
Institute of Medicine. Interprofessional Education for Collaboration: Learning How to Improve Health from Interprofessional Models across the Continuum of Education to Practice: Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press; 2013.
26.
Institute of Medicine. Measuring the Impact of Interprofessional Education on Collaborative Practice and Patient Outcomes. The National Academies Press; 2015.
HsiehHFShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
31.
PattonMQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Sage; 1990.
32.
SudoreRLHeylandDKLumHD, et al.Outcomes that define successful advance care planning: a Delphi panel consensus. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55(2):245–255. e8.
American Nurses Association. Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Published 2015. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.nursingworld.org/coe-view-only
LumHDJonesJMatlockDD, et al.Advance care planning meets group medical visits: the feasibility of promoting conversations. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(2):125–132.
44.
MartinRSHayesBGergorevicKLimWK. The effects of advance care planning interventions on nursing home residents: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(4):284–293.
45.
ParadisEWhiteheadCR. Beyond the lamppost: a proposal for a fourth wave of education for collaboration. Acad Med. 2018;93(10):1457–1463.
46.
PomareCLongJCChurrucaKEllisLABraithwaiteJ. Interprofessional collaboration in hospitals: a critical, broad-based review of the literature. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(4):509–519.
47.
SupperICatalaOLustmanMChemlaCBourgueilYLetrilliartL. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Public Health. 2015;37(4):716–727.
48.
AhluwaliaSCChenCRaaenL, et al.a systematic review in support of the national consensus project clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, fourth edition. J Pain Symptom Manage.2018;56(6):831–870.
49.
NancarrowSABoothAArissSSmithTEnderbyPRootsA. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:19.
50.
SchotETummersLNoordegraafM. Working on working together: a systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(3):332–342.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
