There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient’s wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions.
Methods:
Case report and discussion of the associated ethical issues.
Results:
We present a case of a patient with a pontine stroke, in which the family struggled with decision-making about goals-of-care, leading to fluctuation in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care, then back to Full Code, and finally to Do Not Resuscitate-Do Not Intubate. We discuss factors that contributed to this situation and methods to avoid conflict. Additionally, we review the effects of discord at the end-of-life on patients, families, and the healthcare team.
Conclusion:
It is imperative that healthcare teams proactively collaborate with families to minimize end-of-life conflict by emphasizing decision-making that prioritizes the best interest and autonomy of the patient.
AngusDCBarnatoAELinde-ZwirbleWT, et al.Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med.2004;32(3):638–643.
2.
GruneirAMorVWeitzenSTruchilRTenoJRoyJ. Where people die: a multilevel approach to understanding influences on site of death in America. Med Care Res Rev.2007;64(4):351–378.
3.
LuceJM. Making decisions about the forgoing of life-sustaining therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.1997;156(6):1715–1718.
4.
PrendergastTJClaessensMTLuceJM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.1998;158(4):1163–1167.
5.
AppelbaumPGrissoT. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(25):1635–1638.
6.
RaymontVBuchananWBuchananA, et al.Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet.2004;364(9443):1421–1427.
7.
WengerNSOyeRKBellamyPE, et al.Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. J Gen Intern Med.1994;9(10):539–543.
KayserJBKaplanLJ. Conflict management in the ICU. Crit Care Med.2020;48(9):1349–1357.
10.
KonAADavidsonJEMorrisonW, et al.Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):188–201.
11.
MehterHMMcCannonJBClarkJAWienerRS. Physician approaches to conflict with families surrounding end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit. A qualitative study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(2):241–249.
12.
MajeskoAHongSYWeissfeldLWhiteDB. Identifying family members who may struggle in the role of surrogate decision maker. Crit Care Med.2012;40(8):2281–2286.
13.
GehlbachTGShinkunasLAForman-HoffmanVLThomasKWSchmidtGAKaldjianLC. Code status orders and goals of care in the medical ICU. Chest.2011;139(4):802–809.
14.
HeylandDKBarwichDPichoraD, et al.Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):778–787.
15.
HofmannJCWengerNSDavisRB, et al.Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preference for outcomes and risks of treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(1):1–12.
16.
WilsonMEAkhoundiAKrupaAK, et al.Development, validation, and results of a survey to measure understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation choices among ICU patients and their surrogate decision makers. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:15.
17.
VigEKTaylorJSStarksHHopleyEKFryer-EdwardsK.Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc.2006;54(11):1688–1693.
18.
HelgesonVS. Social support and quality of life. Quality Life Res. 2003;12(1):25–31. doi:10.1023/A:1023509117524
19.
AdelmanEEZahuranecDB. Surrogate decision making in neurocritical care. Continuum (Minneap Minn).2012;18(3):655–658.
20.
CaiXRobinsonJMuehlschlegelS, et al.Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in neuroscience intensive care units. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(1):131–141.
21.
KimHDeatrickJAUlrichCM. Ethical frameworks for surrogates’ end-of-life planning experiences: a qualitative systematic review. Nurs Ethics.2017;24(1):46–69.
22.
SchenkerYCrowley-MatokaMDohanDTiverGAArnoldRMWhiteDB. I don’t want to be the one saying “we should just let him die”: intrapersonal tensions experienced by surrogate decision makers in the ICU. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1657–1665.
23.
WendlerDRidA. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):336–346.
24.
WhiteDB. Rethinking interventions to improve surrogate decision making in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(3):252–257.
25.
LoewensteinG. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24(4S):S49–S56.
26.
FassierTAzoulayE. Conflicts and communication gaps in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16(6):654–665.
27.
KuniavskyMvan HeerdenPVKadmonIDekeyser GanzFLintonDMSviriS. Attitudes of legal guardians in the ICU—a qualitative report. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014;30(2):86–92.
28.
BurtRA. The medical futility debate: patient choice, physician obligation, and end-of-life care. J Palliat Med.2002;5(2):249–254.
29.
DavidsonJEAslaksonRALongAC, et al.Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(1):103–128.
30.
AzoulayESprungCL. Family-physician interactions in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(11):2323–2328.
31.
SuenAOButlerRAArnoldR, et al.Developing the family support tool: an interactive, web-based tool to help families navigate the complexities of surrogate decision making in ICUs. J Crit Care. 2020;56:132–139.
32.
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591–1598.
33.
ResnickHESchuurJDHeinemanJStoneRWeissmanJS. Advance directives in nursing home residents aged > or =65 years: United States 2004. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;25(6):476–482.
34.
DeteringKMHancockADReadeMCSilvesterW. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010:340;c1345.
35.
WhitmerMHurstSPrinsMShepardKMcVeyD. Medical futility: a paradigm as old as Hippocrates. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2009;28(2):67–71.
36.
AronskyDKaswormEJacobsonJAHaugPJDeanNC. Electronic screening of dictated reports to identify patients with do-not-resuscitate status. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(5):403–409.
37.
TorkeAMPetronioSPurnellCESachsGAHelftPRCallahanCM. Communicating with clinicians: the experiences of surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1401–1407.
38.
AbbottKHSagoJGBreenCMAbernethyAPTulskyJA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(1):197–201.
39.
TreesAROhsJEMurrayMC. Family communication about end-of-life decisions and the enactment of the decision-maker role. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017;7(2):36.
40.
JonesJWMcCulloughLB. Dominions of surrogate opinions: who is in charge?J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):249–250.
41.
VigEKStarksHTaylorJSHopleyEKFryer-EdwardsK. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(9):1274–1279.
42.
ScheunemannLPErnecoffNCBuddadhumarukP, et al.Clinician-family communication about patients’ values and preferences in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(5):676–684.
43.
BarclayJSBlackhallLJTulskyJA. Communication strategies and cultural issues in the delivery of bad news. J Palliat Med. 2007;10(4):958–977.
44.
CurtisJREngelbergRAWenrichMDShannonSETreecePDRubenfeldGD. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(8):844–849.
45.
SiegelMD. End-of-life decision making in the ICU. Clin Chest Med.2009;30(1):181–194.
46.
AndersonWGCiminoJWErnecoffNC, et al.A multicenter study of key stakeholders’ perspectives on communicating with surrogates about prognosis in intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(2):142–152.
47.
IversonECeliousAKennedyCR, et al.Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014;30(2):77–85.
48.
KjerulfMRegehrCPopovaSRBakerAJ. Family perceptions of end-of-life care in an urban ICU. Dynamics. 2005;16(3):22–25.
49.
FrickSUehlingerDEZuercher ZenklusenRM. Medical futility: predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors—a prospective comparative study. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(2):456–461.
50.
AndersonRJBlochSArmstrongMStonePCLowJT. Communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Palliat Med. 2019;33(8):926–941.
51.
BiblerTM. Why I no longer say “withdrawal of care” or “life sustaining technology.”J Palliat Med. 2013;16(9):1146–1147.
52.
DeForestA. Better words for better deaths. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(3):211–213.
53.
WolfA. Nurses, Please Don’t Withdraw Care. American Nurse; 2020.
54.
HollowayRGGramlingRKellyAG. Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease. Neurology. 2013;80(8):764–772.
PolitiMCStreetRLJr. The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;17(4):579–584.
57.
WhiteDBEngelbergRAWenrichMDLoBCurtisJR. The language of prognostication in intensive care units. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):76–83.
58.
PopeTM. Legal fundamentals of surrogate decision making. Chest.2012;141(4):1074–1081.
59.
BoersmaIMiyasakiJKutnerJKlugerB. Palliative care and neurology: time for a paradigm shift. Neurology. 2014;83(6):561–567. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000674
60.
BrizziK.CreutzfeldtCJ. Neuropalliative care: a practical guide for the neurologist. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(5):569–575. doi:10/1055/s-0038-1668074
61.
FassierTAzoulayE. Conflicts and communication gaps in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16(6):654–665.
