The ability to perceive care goals of the dying may be an indicator of future quality patient-centered care. Research conducted on end-of-life goals indicates discrepancies between patients and physicians.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to compare end-of-life care goals of hospice patients and medical student perceptions of patient care goals.
Design:
Hospice patients and medical students were surveyed on their care goals and perceptions, respectively, using an 11-item survey of goals previously identified in palliative care literature. Medical student empathy was measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
Settings/Participants:
Eighty hospice patients and 176 medical students (97 first-year and 79 third-year) in a New York State medical school.
Results:
Medical students ranked 7 of the 11 care goals differently than hospice patients: not being a burden to family (p < .001), time with family and friends (p = .002), being at peace with God (p < .001), dying at home (p = .004), feeling that life was meaningful (p < .001), living as long as possible (p < .001), and resolving conflicts (p < .001). Third-year students were less successful than first-year students in perceiving patient care goals of hospice patients. No significant differences in medical student empathy were found based on student year.
Conclusions:
Medical students, while empathetic, were generally unsuccessful in perceiving end-of-life care goals of hospice patients in the psychosocial and spiritual domains. Differences impeding the ability of medical students to understand these care goals may be generationally based. Increased age awareness and sensitivity may improve future end-of-life care discussions. Overall, there is a need to recognize the greater dimensionality of the dying in order to provide the most complete patient-centered care.
ConnorsAFDawsonNVDesbiensNA, et al.A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). J Am Med Assoc. 1995;274(20):1591–1598.
2.
CovinskyKEFullerJDYaffeK, et al.Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(S1):S187–S193.
3.
BakerA. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press; 2001.
4.
DavisonSN.End-of-life care preferences and needs: perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(2):195–204.
5.
Laird-FickHLomisKNelsonAObesoV. Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency—EPA 10 Schematic: Recognize a Patient Requiring Urgent or Emergent Care and Initiate Evaluation and Management. In: ObesoVBrownDPhillipiC, eds. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017.
6.
BlackJ. What are patients’ priorities when facing the end of life? A critical review. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2014;17(6):294–300.
7.
ZhangBNilssonMEPrigersonHG. Factors important to patients’ quality of life at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(15):1133–1142.
8.
CarterHMacLeodRBranderPMcPhersonK. Living with a terminal illness: patients’ priorities. J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(6):611–620.
9.
KhanSAGomesBHigginsonIJ. End-of-life care—what do cancer patients want. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(2):100–108.
10.
KumarGMarkertRJPatelR. Assessment of hospice patients’ goals of care at the end of life. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2011;28(1):31–34.
11.
Lankarani-FardAKnappHLorenzKA, et al.Feasibility of discussing end-of-life care goals with inpatients using a structured, conversational approach: the go wish card game. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(4):637–643.
12.
MiccinesiGBianchiEBrunelliCBorreaniC. End-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal condition. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21(5):623–633.
13.
QuillTNortonSShahMLamYFriddCBuckleyM. What is most important for you to achieve? An analysis of patient responses when receiving palliative care consultation. J Palliat Med. 2006;9(2):382–388.
14.
SingerPAMartinDKKelnerM. Quality end-of-life care. Patients’ perspectives. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281(2):163–168.
15.
WaghornMYoungHDaviesA. Opinions of patients with cancer on the relative importance of place of death in the context of a “good death.”BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011;1(3):310–314.
16.
DowneyLEngelbergRACurtisJRLaffertyWEPatrickDL. Shared priorities for the end-of-life period. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37(2):175–188.
17.
HeylandDKDodekPRockerG, et al.What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;182(16):747–752.
18.
HeylandDKCookDJRockerGM, et al.Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(16):747–752.
19.
SteinhauserKEChristakisNAClippECMcNeillyMMcIntyreLTulskyJA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284(19):2476–2482.
20.
VedelIGhadiVLapointeLRoutelousCAegerterPGuirimandF. Patients’, family caregivers’, and professionals’ perspectives on quality of palliative care: a qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2014;28(9):1128–1138.
21.
VirdunCLuckettTDavidsonPMPhillipsJ. Dying in the hospital setting: a systematic review of quantitative studies identifying the elements of end-of-life care that patients and their families rank as being most important. Palliat Med. 2015;29(9):774–796.
22.
DowneyLAuDHCurtisJREngelbergRA. Life-sustaining treatment preferences: matches and mismatches between patients’ preferences and clinicians’ perceptions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46(1):9–19.
23.
KeatingNLLandrumMBRogersSO, et al.Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer. 2010;116(4):998–1006.
24.
RodriguezKLYoungAJ. Patients’ and healthcare providers’ understandings of life-sustaining treatment: are perceptions of goals shared or divergent?Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(1):125–133.
25.
VisserMDeliensLHouttekierD. Physician-related barriers to communication and patient- and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):604.
26.
HuangHLChengSYYaoCAHuWYChenCYChiuTY. Truth telling and treatment strategies in end-of-life care in physician-led accountable care organizations: discrepancies between patients’ preferences and physicians’ perceptions. Med (United States). 2015;94(16):e657.
27.
ShihCYHuWYChengSY, et al.Patient preferences versus family physicians’ perceptions regarding the place of end-of-life care and death: a nationwide study in Taiwan. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(7):625–630.
28.
WechterEO’GormanDCSinghMKSpanosPDalyBJ. The effects of an early observational experience on medical students’ attitudes toward end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2015;32(1):52–60.
29.
von GuntenCFMullanPNelesenRA, et al.Development and evaluation of a palliative medicine curriculum for third-year medical students. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(11):1198–1217.
30.
MottMLGorawara-BhatRMarschkeMLevineS. Medical students as hospice volunteers: reflections on an early experiential training program in end-of-life care education. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(6):e1270.
31.
AndersonWGWilliamsJEBostJEBarnardD. Exposure to death is associated with positive attitudes and higher knowledge about end-of-life care in graduating medical students. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(9):1227–1233.
32.
MorrisonLJThompsonBMGillAC. A required third-year medical student palliative care curriculum impacts knowledge and attitudes. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(7):784–789.
33.
SchmitJMMeyerLEDuffJMDaiYZouFCloseJL. Perspectives on death and dying: a study of resident comfort with end-of-life care. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):207–302.
34.
SullivanAMWarrenAGLakomaMDLiawKRHwangDBlockSD. End-of-life care in the curriculum: a national study of medical education deans. Acad Med. 2004;79(8):760–768.
35.
HorowitzRGramlingRQuillT. Palliative care education in US medical schools. Med Educ. 2014;48(1):59–66.
36.
HesselinkBAMPasmanHRWVan Der WalGSoethoutMBMOnwuteaka-PhilipsenBD. Education on end-of-life care in the medical curriculum: students’ opinions and knowledge. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(4):381–387.
37.
GibbinsJMccoubrieRForbesK. Why are newly qualified doctors unprepared to care for patients at the end of life?Med Educ. 2011;45(4):389–399.
38.
FraserHCKutnerJSPfeiferMP. Senior medical students’ perceptions of the adequacy of education on end-of-life issues. J Palliat Med. 2001;4(3):337–343.
39.
BussMKMarxESSulmasyDP. The preparedness of students to discuss end-of-life issues with patients. Acad Med. 1998;73(4):418–422.
40.
UryWABerkmanCSWeberCMPignottiMGLeipzigRM. Assessing medical students’ training in end-of-life communication: a survey of interns at one urban teaching hospital. Acad Med. 2003; 78(5):530-537.
41.
BillingsMECurtisJREngelbergRA. Medicine residents’ self-perceived competence in end-of-life care. Acad Med. 2009;84(11):1533–1539.
42.
BillingsMEEngelbergRCurtisJRBlockSSullivanAM. Determinants of medical students’ perceived preparation to perform end-of-life care, quality of end-of-life care education, and attitudes toward end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(3):319–326.
43.
RomotzkyVGalushkoMDüsterdiekA, et al.“It’s not that easy”—medical students’ fears and barriers in end-of-life communication. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(2):333–339.
HojatMGonnellaJSNascaTJMangioneSVergareMMageeM. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(9):1563–1599.
46.
WangHKlineJAJacksonBE, et al.Association between emergency physician self-reported empathy and patient satisfaction. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204113.
47.
KimSSKaplowitzSJohnstonMV. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Heal Prof. 2004;27(3):237–251.
48.
ZachariaeRPedersenCGJensenABEhrnroothERossenPBVon Der MaaseH. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003;88(5):658–665.
49.
WeissRVittinghoffEFangMC, et al.Associations of physician empathy with patient anxiety and ratings of communication in hospital admission encounters. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(10):805–810.
50.
HannanJSanchezGMusserED, et al.Role of empathy in the perception of medical errors in patient encounters: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):327.
51.
ColliverJAConleeMJVerhulstSJDorseyJK. Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: a reexamination of the research. Acad Med. 2010;85(4):588–593.
52.
RoffS. Reconsidering the “decline” of medical student empathy as reported in studies using the Jefferson scale of physician empathy-student version (JSPE-S). Med Teach. 2015;37(8):783–786.
53.
ChenDLewRHershmanWOrlanderJ. A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(10):1434–1438.
54.
NeumannMEdelhäuserFTauschelD, et al.Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):996–1009.
55.
AndersonFDowningGMHillJCasorsoLLerchN. Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care. 1996;12(1):5–11.
56.
InouyeSKVan DyckCHAlessiCABalkinSSiegalAPHorwitzRI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method: a new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):941–948.
57.
DavisM. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. J Chem Inf Model. 1980;10(9):85.
58.
PulosSElisonJLennonR. The hierarchical structure of the interpersonal reactivity index. Soc Behav Personal an Int J. 2004;32(4):355–360.
59.
NobleSMScheweCDKuhrM. Preferences in health care service and treatment. A generational perspective. J Bus Res. 2004;57(9):1033–1041.
BrauerS. The surprising predictable decline of religion in the United States. J Sci Study Relig. 2018;57(4):654–675.
63.
UeckerJERegnerusMDVaalerML. Losing my religion: the social sources of religious decline in early adulthood. Soc Forces. 2007;85(4):1667–1692.
64.
GrantGB. Exploring the possibility of peak individualism, humanity’s existential crisis, and an emerging age of purpose. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1478.
65.
NgESWSchweitzerLLyonsST. New generation, great expectations: a field study of the millennial generation. J Bus Psychol. 2010;25(2):281–292.
66.
CavagnaroEStaffieriSPostmaA. Understanding millennials’ tourism experience: values and meaning to travel as a key for identifying target clusters for youth (sustainable) tourism. J Tour Futur. 2018;4(1):e15.
67.
DealJJAltmanDGRogelbergSG. Millennials at work: what we know and what we need to do (if anything). J Bus Psychol. 2010;25(2):191–199.
