A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach to Improve Communication With Surrogates of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness

Abstract

Background:

Clinicians need to deliver prognostic information to surrogates of nondecisional, critically ill patients so that surrogates can make informed medical decisions that reflect the patient’s values. Our objective was to implement a new approach for communicating with surrogates of patients with chronic critical illness.

Methods:

Surrogate decision makers of patients who were difficult to liberate from mechanical ventilation were prospectively enrolled. Surrogates met with different members of the intensive care unit treatment team for sequential 15-minute appointments to receive patient-specific assessments and education on chronic critical illness. The feasibility and acceptability of this approach were determined. A 24-question comprehension instrument was developed to assess a participant’s understanding that a family member was displaying features of chronic critical illness. Each question was scored from 1 to 5, with larger scores indicating greater comprehension.

Results:

Over a 15-week period, educational sessions for 9 mechanically ventilated patients were conducted. On average, 2 surrogates per patient (range: 1-4) and 6 members of the interdisciplinary team (range: 4-6) were at each meeting. Surrogates and clinicians had very positive impressions of the communication intervention. The average preintervention comprehension score was 85 of 120 (standard deviation [SD]: 8, range: 71-101). The postintervention comprehension score was greater by 5 points on average (SD: 9, range: −11 to +20 points, P = .04).

Conclusions:

Surrogates of critically ill patients approved of this novel communication approach and had a greater understanding of the patient’s medical condition after the intervention.

Keywords

chronic critical illness prolonged mechanical ventilation shared decision-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carson

. Definitions and epidemiology of the chronically critically ill. Respir Care. 2012;57(6):848–856; discussion 856-848.

Nelson

Cox

Hope

Carson

. Chronic critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(4):446–454.

Damuth

Mitchell

Bartock

Roberts

Trzeciak

. Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(7):544–553.

Unroe

Kahn

Carson

, et al. One-year trajectories of care and resource utilization for recipients of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(3):167–175.

Davidson

Aslakson

Long

, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(1):103–128.

Haines

Kelly

Fitzgerald

Skinner

Iwashyna

. The untapped potential of patient and family engagement in the organization of critical care. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(5):899–906.

Olding

McMillan

Reeves

Schmitt

Puntillo

Kitto

. Patient and family involvement in adult critical and intensive care settings: a scoping review. Health Expect. 2016;19(6):1183–1202.

Anderson

Cimino

Ernecoff

, et al. A multicenter study of key stakeholders’ perspectives on communicating with surrogates about prognosis in intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(2):142–152.

Azoulay

Chevret

Leleu

, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):3044–3049.

10.

Cox

Martinu

Sathy

, et al. Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(11):2888–2894; quiz 2904.

11.

Nelson

Mercado

Camhi

, et al. Communication about chronic critical illness. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(22):2509–2515.

12.

Carson

Danis

, et al. Development and validation of a printed information brochure for families of chronically critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(1):73–78.

13.

Nelson

Kinjo

Meier

Ahmad

Morrison

. When critical illness becomes chronic: informational needs of patients and families. J Crit Care. 2005;20(1):79–89.

14.

Davidson

Jones

Bienvenu

. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):618–624.

15.

Curtis

Back

Ford

, et al. Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(21):2271–2281.

16.

Lautrette

Darmon

Megarbane

, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469–478.

17.

White

Angus

Shields

, et al. A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2365–2375.

18.

Nelson

Hanson

Keller

, et al. The voice of surrogate decision-makers. Family responses to prognostic information in chronic critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(7):864–872.

19.

Greenberg

Balk

Shah

. Score for predicting ventilator weaning duration in patients with tracheostomies. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27(6):477–485.

20.

Hough

Caldwell

Cox

, et al. Development and validation of a mortality prediction model for patients receiving 14 days of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(11):2339–2345.

21.

White

Ernecoff

Buddadhumaruk

, et al. Prevalence of and factors related to discordance about prognosis between physicians and surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2086–2094.

22.

Zier

Burack

Micco

, et al. Doubt and belief in physicians’ ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2341–2347.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB

0.13 MB

0.15 MB