MelvinAK. Final time: coming to the end. In: MelvinAKSusanHM, Eds. Aging, Spirituality, and Religion: A Handbook, Vol. 2. Minneapolis: Fortress Press; 2003:449–459.
7.
PerryJEChurchillLRKirshnerHS. The Terri Schiavo case: legal, ethical, and medical perspectives. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(10):744-748. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16287796, p. 1. Accessed January 31, 2014.
8.
SzaboL.Ethicists criticize treatment of teen, Texas woman. USA Today. 7:43 pm EST. January 10, 2014. http://usat.ly/1d6PnTf. Accessed January 31, 2014.
9.
MillerFGTruogRD. The incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria: a commentary on Controversies in the determination of death, a White Paper by the President's council on bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009;19(2):185–193; 191.
10.
SinghM.“Why Hospitals and Families Still Struggle to Define Death”; National Public Radio, “Your Health,” January 10, 2014. http://n.pr/1bxqE6V. Accessed January 31, 2014; p. 1.
11.
Kagawa-SingerMBlackhallLJ. Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: you got to go where he Lives. JAMA. 2001;286(23):2993–3001. doi:10.1001/jama.286.23.2993.
12.
DuffySAJacksonFCSchimSMRonisDLFowlerKE. Racial/ethnic preferences, sex preferences, and perceived discrimination related to end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(1):150–157. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00526.
13.
Thuné-BoyleIC. Terminally ill patients who are supported by religious communities are more likely to receive aggressive end-of-life care rather than hospice care; spiritual support from medical teams may reverse this [published online November 1, 2013]. Evid Based Nurs. doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101509.
14.
Tenn. Code Ann. §68-3-501.
15.
Va. Code Ann. §54.1-2972.
16.
ChoiEKFredlandVZachodniCLammersJEBledsoePHelftPR. Brain death revisited: the case for a national standard. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(4):824–835.