Since 1995, studies have shown mixed results in the efficacy of advance directives. With new technologies, advance care planning is being transformed through video, computer programs, electronic registries, and electronic health records. In Nevada and Texas, Web sites and mobile applications provide education, guided interviews, storage, and retrieval in multiple languages. Drawing on 371 completed evaluations from both states, the authors show that increasingly people are finding advance directive information on the Internet, completing directives to be prepared and to have control, and that the attraction of these Web sites is their ease of use. Users report where they keep their documents, with whom they have end-of-life conversations, and what medical care requests they make.
DawsonAWrigleyA. Adead proposal: Levi and Green on advance directives. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(4):23–24.
4.
The SUPPORTPrincipal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591–1598.
5.
KeatingNLLandrumMBRogersSOJr. Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer. 2010;116(4):998–1006.
6.
TulskyJA. Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life. JAMA. 2005;294(3):359–365.
7.
DittoPHDanksJHSmuckerWD. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):421–430.
8.
BergerJT. What about process? Limitations in advance directives, care planning, and noncapacitated decision making. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(4):33–34.
9.
PerkinsHS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):51–57.
10.
WrightAAZhangBRayA. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300(14):1665–1673.
11.
NicholasLHLangaKMIwashynaTJWeirDR. Regional variation in the association between advance directives and end-of-life Medicare expenditures. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1447–1453.
12.
SilveiraMJKimSYLangaKM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211–1218.
13.
KohutAKeeterSDohertyC.Strong Public Support for the Right to Die: More Americans Discussing -- and Planning -- End-of-life Treatment. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press; 2006. www.people-press.org/2006/01/05/strong-public-support-for-right-to-die/. Accessed May 30, 2012.
14.
POLST Paradigm. Physicians orders for life-sustaining treatment paradigm, 2012 2008. http://www.ohsu.edu/polst/. Accessed May 30, 2012.
15.
AultmanJM.Ethics of translation: MOLST and electronic advance directives. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(4):30–32.
16.
BrickerLJLambingAMarkeyC. Enhancing communication for end-of-life care: an electronic advance directive process. J Palliat Med. 2003;6(3):511–519.
17.
El-JawahriAPodgurskiLMEichlerAF. Use of video to facilitate end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):305–310.
18.
LeviBHGreenMJ. Too soon to give up: re-examining the value of advance directives. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(4):3–22.
19.
ShermanPS. Computer-assisted creation of psychiatric advance directives. Community Ment Health J. 1998;34(4):351–362.
US Census Bureau. Current Population Survey: Reported Internet Usage for Individuals 3 and Older, by State 2009. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2010. http://www.census.gov/hhes/computer/publications/2010.html. Accessed May 30, 2012.
22.
HighDM. Advance directives and the elderly: a study of intervention strategies to increase use. Gerontologist. 1993;33(3):342–349.
23.
PerkinsHS. Time to move advance care planning beyond advance directives. Chest. 2000;117(5):1228–1231.
24.
StumpBFKlugmanCMThorntonB. Last hours of life: encouraging end-of-life conversations. J Clin Ethics. 2008;19(2):150–159.
25.
OddiLFCassidyVR. The message of SUPPORT: study to understand prognosis and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Change is long overdue. J Prof Nurs. 1998;14(3):165–174.
26.
CoppolaKMBookwalaJDittoPHLockhartLKDanksJHSmuckerWD. Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatments: the role of impairment, prognosis, and pain. Death Stud. 1999;23(7):617–634.
