There is growing awareness that pain and other symptoms are often poorly managed at the end of life. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to compare the quality of care provided to a convenience sample of 195 patients who died during a six-month period, using a retrospective chart review. Quality was defined by symptom documentation, use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the final 48 hours of life, and determination of advance directives. Daily and total charges incurred by these patients were also captured. Symptom distress was common, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were widespread. These data suggest areas for improvement in clinical practice, in palliative care units, and in all settings where end-of-life care is provided. Also, the data can guide future research into the quality of care provided to dying persons.
McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Zhong Z, et al.: Dying with cancer: patients’ function, symptoms, and care preferences as death approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: S110-S121.
6.
Meier DE, Morrison RS, Cassel CK: Improving palliative care. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 128: 509-510.
7.
The Principal SUPPORT Investigators: A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995; 274: 1591-1598.
8.
Desbiens NA, Wu AW: Pain and suffering in seriously ill hospitalized patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: S183-S186.
9.
Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al.: Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). Am J Med. 1998; 105: 222-229.
10.
Finns JJ, Miller FG, Acres CA, et al.: End-of-life decision-making in the hospital: current practice and future prospects. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999; 17: 6-15.
11.
Hamel MB, Davis RB, Teno JM, et al.: Older age, aggressiveness of care, and survival for seriously ill, hospitalized adults. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131: 721-728.
12.
Lawson-Matthew PJ, Wilson AT, Woodmansey PA, et al.: Unsatisfactory management of patients with myocardial infarction admitted to general medical wards. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994; 28: 49-51.
13.
Making the case for hospital-based palliative care. Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) Web site. Available at www.capcmssm.org/Documents/document_177160330.html.
14.
Arnold R, Bailey FA, Billings JA, et al.: Pioneer Programs in Palliative Care: Nine Case Studies. New York: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Milbank Memorial Fund, 2000.
15.
Teno J: End of life chart review. The Center to Improve Care of the Dying Web site. Available at www.gwu.edu/%7Ecicd/toolkit/toolcharts.htm.
16.
Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, et al.: In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 825-832.
17.
Manfredi PL, Morrison RS, Morris J, et al.: Palliative care consultations: how do they impact the care of hospitalized patients?J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000; 20: 166-173.
18.
McMillan SC, Weitzner M: How problematic are various aspects of quality of life in patients with cancer at the end of life?Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000; 27: 817-823.
19.
Seamark DA, Lawrence C, Gilbert J: Characteristics of referrals to an inpatient hospice and a survey of general practitioner perceptions of palliative care. J R Soc Med. 1996; 89: 79-84.
20.
Thornes A, Sykes N: Opioid use in last week of life and implications for end-of-life decision-making. Lancet. 2000; 356: 398-399.
21.
Teno JM, Casey VA, Welch LC, et al.: Patient-focused, family-centered end-of-life medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22: 738-751.
22.
Middlewood S, Gardner G, Gardner A: Dying in hospital: medical failure or natural outcome?J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22: 1035-1041.
23.
Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, et al.: Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127(1): 1-12.
24.
Christakis NA, Lamont EB: Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000; 320: 469-473.
25.
Mackillop WJ, Quirt CF: Measuring the accuracy of prognostic judgments in oncology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 21-29.
26.
Education on Palliative and End-of-life Care (EPEC) Project Web site. Available at www.epec.net.
27.
End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC) Project Web site www.aacn.nche.edu/elnec.
28.
Glare P, Virik K: Independent prospective validation of the PaP score in terminally ill patients referred to a hospital-based palliative medicine consultation service. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22: 891-898.
29.
Strömgren AS, Groenvold M, Pedersen L, et al.: Does the medical record cover the symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving palliative care? A comparison of the record and patient self-rating. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 21: 189-196.
30.
Nerenz DR: Capacities and limitations of information systems as data sources on quality of care at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22: 773-783.
31.
Paci E, Miccinesi G, Toscani F, et al.: Quality of life assessment and outcome of palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 21: 179-188.
