Little attention has been paid to documenting the quality and impact of hospice bereavement programs. While quality of life, quality of dying, and quality of end-of-life measures are common indicators of effective clinical service, they are not adequate gauges of quality from a bereavement perspective. The National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO) published standards for hospice and palliative care programs that included a section on bereavement care.1 Little evaluative work has been done to discover whether hospice programs nationwide are compliant with these standards. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether hospice programs (n = 32) in the state of Ohio were meeting the NHPCO bereavement standards. Findings indicated that the participating hospice programs were 83 percent compliant at least some of the time.
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization: Standards of practice for hospice programs. Alexandria, VA: National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, 2000.
2.
Massaro T, McMillan SC: Instruments for assessing quality of life in palliative care settings. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2000; 6(9): 429-433.
3.
Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR: Evaluating the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22(3): 717-726.
4.
Teno JM, Clarridge B, Casey V, et al.: Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22(3): 752-758.
5.
Donaldson MS: The importance of measuring quality of care at the end of life. Hosp J. 1998; 13(1/2): 117-138.
6.
Merriman MP: Documenting the impact of hospice. Hosp J. 1999; 14(3/4): 177-192.
7.
Sharpnack JD: The efficacy of group bereavement interventions: An integrative review of the research literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 2000.
8.
Kane RL, Klein SJ, Bernstein L, et al.: The role of hospice in reducing the impact of bereavement. J Chronic Disord. 1986; 39(9): 735-742.
9.
Schulz R, Newsom JT, Fleissner K, et al.: The effects of bereavement after family caregiving. Aging Ment Health. 1997; 1: 269-282.
10.
Bouton BL: The interdisciplinary bereavement team: Defining and directing appropriate bereavement care. Hosp J. 1996; 11(4): 15-24.
11.
D’Onofrio CN: Hospice quality improvement programs: An initial examination. Top Health Inf Manage. 1998; 18(4): 13-31.
12.
Gohmann SF, Head B: Hospice benchmarking: One state’s initiative to analyze and improve hospice care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2001; 3(2): 41-50.
13.
Kovacs PJ: Hospice research: Challenges, opportunities and rewards. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1998; Sept/Oct: 295-300.
14.
Ryndes T, Connor S, Cody C, et al.: Report on the Alpha and Beta Pilots of End Result Outcomes Measures Constructed by the Outcomes Forum 1998-2000. Available online at: http://www.nhpco.org, June 20, 2001.
15.
Beresford L: Outcomes for hospice. Hospice Managers Monograph. Nashville, TN: THA (an association of hospitals and health systems), 1996.
16.
Dush DM, Cassileth BR: Program evaluation in terminal care. Hosp J. 1985; 1(1): 55-72.
17.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: 2001-2002 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Home Care. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2001.
18.
Community Healthcare Accreditation Program: Standards of Excellence. New York, NY: Community Healthcare Accreditation Program, 1997.
19.
United States Census Bureau: Census 2000 Urban and Rural Classification. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/au_2k.html, July 24, 2002.
20.
Miller GW, Williams JR, English DJ, et al.: Delivering quality care and cost effectiveness at the end of life: Building on the 20-year success of the Medicare hospice benefit. Available online at: http://nhpco.org, July 30, 2002.
