Mann T: The Magic Mountain: A Novel (trans. by JE Woods). New York: Knopf,1995.
2.
Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ: Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, 1-12.
3.
Fevang BT, Fevang J, Stangeland L, et al.: Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg. 2000; 231(4): 529-537.
4.
Suter M, Zermatten P, Halkic N, et al.: Laproscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: Are there predictors of success or failure?Surg Endosc. 2000; 14(5): 478-483.
5.
Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, et al.: Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995; 274: 820-825.
6.
Solomon MZ, O’Donnell L, Jennings B, et al.: Decisions near the end of life: Professional views on life-sustaining treatments. Am J Public Hlth. 1993; 83: 14-23.
7.
Weissman DE, Block SD: ACGME requirements for end-of-life training in selected residency and fellowship programs: A status report. Acad Med. 2002; 77: 299-304.
8.
Fins JJ, Nilson EG: An approach to educating residents about palliative care and clinical ethics. Acad Med. 2000; 75: 662-665.
9.
Martin DK, Thiel EC, Singer PA: A new model of advance care planning: Observations from people with HIV. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 159: 86-92.
10.
Singer PA, Martin DK, Lavery JV, et al.: Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patients’ perspective. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158: 879-884.
11.
Yellen SB, Burton LA, Elpern E: Communication about advance directives: Are patients sharing information with physicians?Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997; 6: 461-469.
12.
Sehgal A, Galbraith A, Chesney M, et al.: How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed?JAMA. 1992; 267: 59-63.
13.
Hines SC, Glover JJ, Babrow AS, et al.: Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences. J Palliat Med. 2001; 4: 481-489.
14.
Braithwaite S, Thomasma D: New guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining treatment in incompetent patients: An anti-cruelty policy. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 104: 711-715.
15.
Dew B: Do those who cannot speak really have a voice?Law, Med Health Care. 1992; 20: 316-376.
16.
McCall N: Utilization and costs of medicare services by beneficiaries in their last year of life. Med Care. 1984; 22: 329-342.
17.
Fetters MD, Churchill L, Danis M: Conflict resolution at the end of life. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29: 921-925.
18.
Suhl J, Simons P, Reedy T: Myth of substituted judgment: Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Int Med. 1994; 154: 90-96.
19.
Seckler AB, Meier DE, Mulvihill M, et al.: Substituted judgment: How accurate are proxy predictions?Ann Int Med. 1991; 115: 92-98.
20.
Zwiebel NR, Cassel CK: Treatment choices at the end of life: A comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist. 1989; 29: 615-621.
21.
Hauser JM, Kleefield SF, Brennan TA, et al.: Minority populations and advance directives: Insights from a focus group methodology. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997; 809: 480-484.
22.
Lapine A, Wang-Cheng R, Goldstein M, et al.: When cultures clash: Physician, patient, and family wishes in truth disclosure for dying patients. J Palliat Med. 2001; 4: 475-480.
23.
DuVal G, Sartorius L, Danis M: What triggers requests for ethics consultations?J Med Ethics. 2001; 27(suppl. 1): 24-29.
24.
Casarett DJ, Daskal F, Lantos J: The authority of the clinical ethicist. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998; 28: 6-11.
25.
Jackson WC: When all else is done: The challenge of improving antemortem care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psych. 1999; 1(5): 146-153.
26.
Jackson WC, Connor DP, Tavernier L: Antemortem care in an afternoon: A successful four-hour curriculum for third-year medical students. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2002; 19(5): 338-342.
27.
Wear D: Face-to-face with ‘it’: Medical students’ narratives about their end-of-life education. Acad Med. 2002; 77: 271-277.
28.
Whitcomb ME: Meeting the challenge to improve end-of-life-care education. Acad Med. 2002; 77: 269-270.
