Existing alongside the traditional forms of qualitative social science research, there is a set of potential research methods that derive from experiential groupwork and the humanistic human potential movement and are only slightly used by researchers. Social science research has barely begun to use these powerful strategies that were developed originally for personal and group change but that are potentially applicable to the research domain. This article will locate these methods within the qualitative research domain and propose a novel view of their value. The study of the actual and potential use of one of these methods, imagework, will be the particular focus of this article. References to the use of artwork, sculpting, psychodrama, gestalt, and dreamwork will also be made. The hypothesis underpinning the author’s approach is that experiential research methods such as imagework can elicit implicit knowledge and self-identities of respondents in a way that other methods cannot.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achterberg, J. (1985). Imagery in healing. Boston: Shambhala.
2.
Assagioli, R. (1975). Psychosynthesis. Wellingborough, UK: Turnstone.
3.
Bendelow, G. (1992). Using visual imagery to explore gendered notions of pain. In C. Renzetti & R. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive issues (pp. 221-228). London: Sage.
4.
Benson, J. (1987). Working more creatively with groups. London: Tavistock.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Clandinin, D. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action. London: Falmer.
7.
Clandinin, D. , & Connelly, F. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413-427). London: Sage.
8.
Denzin, G. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In G. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). London: Sage.
9.
Denzin, G. , & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
10.
DeVos, G. , & Wagatsuma, H. (1961). Value attitudes towards role behaviour of women in two Japanese villages. American Anthropologist, 63, 1204-1230.
11.
Edgar, I. (1995). Dreamwork, anthropology and the caring professions: A cultural approach to dreamwork. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
12.
Edgerton, R. (1971). The individual in cultural adaptation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Ernst, S. , & Goodison, L. (1981). In our own hands: A book of self-help therapy. London: Women’s Press.
14.
Ewing, K. (1994). Dreams from a saint: Anthropological atheism and the temptation to believe. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 571-583.
15.
Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociologist, 21, 105-114.
16.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretative anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
George, M. (1995). Dreams, reality, and the desire and intent of dreamers as experienced by a fieldworker. Anthropology of Consciousness, 6(3), 17-33.
19.
Glouberman, D. (1989). Life choices and life changes through imagework. London: Unwin.
20.
Goulet, J-G. (1994). Introduction. In J-G. Goulet & D. Young (Eds.), Being changed by cross-cultural experiences (pp. 7-15). London: Routledge.
21.
Hastrup, K. (1992). Writing ethnography: State of the art. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (ASA Monographs No. 29, pp. 116-133). London: Routledge.
22.
Hillman, D. (1989). Dreamwork and fieldwork: Linking cultural anthropology and the current dream-work movement. In M. Ullman & C. Limmer (Eds.), The variety of dream experience (pp. 117-141). Wellingborough, UK: Acquarian.
23.
James, A. (1993). Childhood identities: Self and social relationships in the experiences of the child. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
24.
Jedrej, M. , & Shaw, R. (1993). Introduction. In M. Jedrej & R. Shaw (Eds.), Dreaming, religion and society in Africa (pp. 1-20). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
25.
Jennings, S. (1986). Creative drama in groupwork. Bicester, Oxon, UK: Winslow.
26.
Johnson, A. (1978). Research methods in social anthropology. London: Edward Arnold.
27.
Jung, C. (1959). Archetypes of the collective unconscious. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McQuire (Eds.), The collected works of Jung (pp. 3-41). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
28.
Kohn, T. (1995). She came out of the field and into my home: Reflections, dreams and a search for consciousness in anthropological method. In A. Cohen & N. Rapport (Eds.), Questions of consciousness (pp. 40-59). London: Routledge.
29.
Levine, J. (1991). The role of culture in the representation of conflict in dreams: A comparison of Bedouin, Irish and Israeli children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(4), 472-490.
30.
Levine, S. (1981). Dreams of the informant about the researcher: Some difficulties inherent in the research relationship. Ethos, 9, 276-293.
31.
Markham, U. (1989). The elements of visualisation. Shaftesbury, Dorset, UK: Element Books.
32.
Mead, M. , & Wolfenstein, M. (1955). Introduction to Part 5. In M. Mead & M. Wolfenstein (Eds.), Childhood in contemporary cultures (pp. 297-299). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Parse, R. (1995). The human becoming practice methodology. In R. Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research (pp. 81-86). New York: National League for Nursing Press.
34.
Pretty, J. , Guijt, I., Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (1995). A trainer’s guide for participatory learning and action. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
35.
Renzetti, C. , & Lee, R. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Rowan, J. (1993). The transpersonal: Psychotherapy and counselling. London: Routledge.
37.
Stuhlmiller, C. , & Thorsen, R. (1997). Narrative picturing: A new strategy for qualitative data collection. Qualitative Health Research, 7(1), 140-149.
38.
Tedlock, B. (1987). Dreaming and dream research. In B. Tedlock (Ed.), Dreaming: Anthropological and psychological interpretations (pp. 1-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Wunder, D. (1993). Dreams as empirical data: Siblings’ dreams and fantasies about their disabled sisters and brothers. Journal of Symbolic Interaction, 16(2), 117-127.
