The hospice vision of providing democratic and humane care of the dying needs to be operationalized in the "real world" of health care bureaucracies. It is at this interface between idealists and the demands of mainstream health care that hospice organizations experience compromise, diversion, and an ongoing threat to their singleness of purpose. This discussion explores this process of routinization through research findings on a hospice organization known as Karuna Hospice Service (KHS). Such findings suggest that, although this hospice inevitably defers to the bureaucratic demands of the system, KHS's spiritual discourse does offer some protection to the formalizing and dehumanizing demands of routinization. Such research findings are provided as a contribution to exploring and documenting the ways in which hospices are negotiating this difficult and important ideological challenge. It is argued that effectively meeting such a challenge is of central importance for the survival of the hospice movement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, E. (1986). The hospice movement: Institutionalising innovation. International Journal of Health Services, 16(1), 71-85.
2.
Aronowitz, S. (1992). The tensions of critical theory: Is negative dialectics all there is? In S. Seidman & D. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 289-315). Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
3.
Bendix, R. (1966). Max Weber. London: Methuen.
4.
Britten, N. (1991). Hospital consultants' views of their patients. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13, 83-97.
5.
Cheek, J. , & Rudge, T. (1994). Webs of documentation: The discourse of case notes. Australian Journal of Communication, 21(2), 1-51.
6.
Clark, D. (Ed.). (1993). The future of palliative care: Issues of policy and practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7.
Corbett, T. , & Hai, D. (1979). Searching for euthanatos: The hospice alternative. Hospital Progress, 60, 38-41.
8.
Davies, B. (1994). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
9.
Dear, M. (1988). The postmodern challenge: Reconstructing human geography. Trans Institute British Geography, 13, 262-274.
10.
Degner, L. , Gow, C., & Thompson, L. (1991). Critical nursing behaviors in care for the dying. Cancer Nursing, 14, 246-253.
11.
Elam, D. (1994). Feminism and deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
12.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
13.
Fisher, S. , & Todd, A. (1986). Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education, and law (Vol. 19). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Fox, N. (1993). Postmodernism, sociology and health. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
15.
Fraser, N. , & Nicholson, L. (1988). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. Theory, Culture, and Society, 5, 373-394.
16.
Hull, M. (1991). Hospice nurses: Caring support for caregiving families. Cancer Nursing, 14(2), 63-70.
17.
Hyman, R. , & Bulkin, W. (1990). Physician reported incentives and disincentives for referring patients to hospice. Hospice Journal, 6(4), 39-59.
18.
James, N. , & Field, D. (1992). The routinization of hospice: Charisma and bureaucratization. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 1363-1375.
19.
Johnstone, M. (1994). Bioethics: A nursing perspective. Melbourne, Australia: Harcourt Brace jovanovich.
20.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
21.
Lemert, C. (1992). General social theory, irony, postmodernism. In S. Seidman & D. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 17-41). Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
22.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
23.
Manning, M. (1984). The hospice alternative: Living with dying. London: Souvenir.
24.
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Qualitative Research Methods Series, No. 13). London: Sage.
25.
McGrath, P. (1997a). Putting spirituality on the agenda: Hospice research findings on the "ignored" dimension. Hospice Journal, 12(4), 1-14.
26.
McGrath, P. (1997b). Spirituality and discourse: A postmodern approach to hospice research. Australian Health Review, 20(2), 116-128.
27.
Mumby, D. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28.
Norris, C. (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and practice. London: Methuen.
29.
Norris, C. (1987). Derrida. London: Fontana.
30.
Paradis, L. , & Cummings, S. (1986). The evolution of hospice in America toward organizational homogeneity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 370-386.
31.
Petersen, A. (1994). In a critical condition: Health and power relations in Australia. St. Leonards, New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.
32.
Punch, M. (1974). The sociology of the anti-institution. British Journal of Sociology, 25, 312-325.
33.
Ratcliff, K. , Feree, M., Mellow, G., Wright, B., Price, G., Yanoshik, K., & Fenton, M. (Eds.). (1989). Health technology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34.
Raudonis, B. (1995). Empathic nurse-patient relationships in hospice nursing. Hospice Journal, 10(1), 59-73.
35.
Rinaldi, A. , & Kearl, M. (1990). The hospice farewell: Ideological perspectives of its professional practitioners. Omega, 21, 283-300.
36.
Ross, L. (1994). Spiritual aspects of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 439-447.
37.
Seidman, S. , & Wagner, D. (Eds.). (1992). Postmodernism and social theory. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
38.
Siebold, C. (1992). The hospice movement: Easing death's pains. New York: Twayne.
39.
Smart, B. (1993). Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
40.
Wald, F. , Foster, Z., & Wald, H. (1980, March). The hospice movement as a health care reform. Nursing Outlook, pp. 173-178.
41.
Wilkinson, H. , MacDonald, D., & Pilz, L. (1990, July-August). Issues of concern to hospice personnel: Results of a hospice opinion poll. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, pp. 31-36.
