The sense of loss of self that individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) experience when they interact with society is explored in this article. An individual with TBI believes that others possess the power to label him or her. The labels, whether their connotations are negative or positive, often contradict the individual's self-definition, making him or her feel that he or she is not understood. Many individuals with TBI devise strategies to maintain or create a shared meaning of selfin society. They try to control information about themselves or change the terms applied to them. Through these strategies, people with TBI redefine themselves as objects of medical intervention while excluding brain injuries from their identities, or the essential parts of themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akridge, R. L. (1986). A community model of habilitation/rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 10, 81-87.
2.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New YorkFree Press.
3.
Bergland, M. M. , & Thomas, K. R. (1991). Psychological issues following severe head injury in adolescence: Individual and family perspectives. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 5-22.
4.
Bogdan, R. C. , & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209-232.
6.
Corbin, J. , & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluation criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
7.
Crisp, R. (1994). Social integration after traumatic brain impairment. A qualitative analysis. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 25(4), 16-21.
8.
(Reprinted from Artificial Limbs, 3, 4-62, 1956)
9.
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
10.
Gliedman, J. , & Roth, W., (1980). Unexpected minority: Handicapped children in America. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Gove, W, R. (1980). The labeling of deviance (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Karpman, T. , Wolfe, S., & Vargo, J. W. (1986). The psychological adjustment of adult clients and their parents following dosed-head injury. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 17, 28-33.
14.
Krefting, L. (1989). Reintegration into the community after head injury: The results of an ethnographic study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9, 67-83.
15.
Krefting, L. (1990). Double bind and disability: The case of traumatic head injury. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 859-865.
16.
Kreutzer, J. S. , & Wehman, C. F. (Eds.). (1990). Community integration following traumatic brain injury. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
17.
Lewington, P. J. (1993). Counseling survivors of traumatic brain injury. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 27(4), 274-288.
18.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Miller, L. (1993). Psychotherapy of the brain-injured patient: Reclaiming the shattered self. New York: W. W. Norton.
20.
Miller, L. (1996). Neuropsychology and pathophysiology of mild head injury and the postconcussion syndrome: Clinical and forensic consideration. Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 14(1), 8-23.
21.
Nochi, M. (1997). Dealing with the "void": Tiraumatic brain injury as a story. Disability and Society, 12, 533-555.
22.
Nochi, M. (in press). Loss of self in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: A qualitative analysis. Social Science and Medicine.
23.
Nodhi, M. , & Handley, M. (1996). Counseling people with traumatic brain injury. In P. Pedersen & D. C. Locke (Eds.), Cultural and diversity issues in counseling (pp. 65-67). Greensboro, NC: ERIC/CASS.
24.
Parsons, T. (1951). Social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
25.
Pollack, I. W. (1994). Individual psychotherapy. In J. M. Silver, S. C. Yudofsky, & R. E. Hales (Eds.), Neuropsychiatry of traumatic brain injury (pp. 671-702). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
26.
Rosen, S. L. (1994). Survivor. In B. Shaw (Ed.), The ragged edge: The disability experience from the pages of the first fifteen years of the Disability Rag (pp. 19-21). Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.
27.
Rubin, S. E. , & Roessler, R. T. (1995). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
28.
Scheff, T. (1966). Being mentally ill. Chicago: Aldine.
29.
Stevens, M. L. , Curl, R. M., & Rule, S. (1993). From protection to independence: Utilizing intersect or cooperation to ensure consumer options. Journal of Rehabilitation, 59(1), 35-39.
30.
Ylvisaker, M. , & Gobble, E.M.R. (Eds.). (1987). Community reentry for head injured adults. Boston: Little, Brown.
31.
Zitney, G. A. (1995). President's message. TBI Challenge!, 3(3-4), 2-3.
