Although secondary analysis holds considerable promise for optimizing the health knowledge that can be constructed in relation to existing qualitative databases, methodological developments to guide design and evaluation of this research have not been fully explored in the qualitative research literature. This article extends preliminary methodological explorations to address two specific concerns arising from secondary analysis: ethics and representation. Because secondary research creates the potential for exaggerating certain errors in both ethics and representation, the risks associated with such analyses must be considered in the light of the opportunities. Preliminary strategies for helping secondary qualitative researchers to articulate and resolve the representational and ethical problems that may arise from their work are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archbold, P. (1986). Ethical issues in qualitative research. In W.C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing (pp. 154-163). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Bernard, H. R. , Pelto, P. J., Werner, O., Boster, J., Romney, A. K., Johnson, A., Ember, C. R., & Kastakoff, A. (1986). The construction of primary data in cultural anthropology. Current Anthropology, 27, 382-396.
4.
Brody, H. (1992). Philosophic approaches. In W. L. Miller & B. F. Crabtree (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 174-185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Cassell, J. (1980). Ethical principles for conducting fieldwork. American Anthropologist, 82, 28-41.
6.
Catanzaro, M. (1988). Using qualitative analytic techniques. In N. F. Woods & M. Catanzaro, Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 437-456). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
7.
Cheek, J. (1996). Taking a view: Qualitative research as representation. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 492-505.
8.
Cicourel, A. V. (1982). Interviews, surveys, and the problem of ecological validity. The American Sociologist, 17, 11-20.
9.
Corti, L. , Foster, J., & Thompson, P. (1996). The need for a qualitative data archival policy. Qualitative Health Research, 6(1), 135-139.
10.
Gadamer, H. G. (1988). On the circle of understanding. In J. M. Connolly & T. Kentner (Trans. & Eds.), Hermeneutics versus science? Three German essays. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
11.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Hinds, P. S. , Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 408-424.
13.
Kirk, J. , & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Knafl, K. A. , & Breitmayer, B. J. (1986). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 209-220). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
15.
Knafl, K. A. , & Howard, M. J. (1984). Interpreting and reporting qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 7, 17-24.
16.
Ladwig, J. G. , & Gore, J. M. (1994). Extending power and specifying method within the discourse of activist research. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 227-238). New York: Routledge.
17.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Lipson, J. (1994). Ethical issues in ethnography. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 333-355). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Loflund, J. (1976). Developing disciplined abstractions. In Doing social life: The qualitative study of human interactions in natural settings (pp. 62-80). New York: John Wiley.
20.
Maguire, P. (1996). Considering more feminist participatory research: What's congruency got to do with it?Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 106-118.
21.
Munhall, P. L. (1988). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 150-162.
22.
Patai, D. (1994). When method becomes power. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 61-73). New York: Routledge.
23.
Paterson, B. , Thorne, S., & Dewis, M. (1998). Adapting to and managing diabetes. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30 (1), 57-62.
24.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
25.
Ramos, M. C. (1989). Some ethical implications of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 12, 57-63.
26.
Rosen, S. (1987). Hermeneutics as politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.
28.
Sandelowski, M. (1991). Telling stories: Narrative approaches in qualitative research. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(3), 161-166.
29.
Sandelowski, M. (1996). One is the liveliest number: The case orientation of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 19, 525-529.
30.
Scheff, T. J. (1986). Toward resolving the controversy over "thick description."Current Anthropology, 27, 408-409.
31.
Swanson, J. M. (1986). Analyzing data for categories and description. In W. C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing (pp. 121-132). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
Tesch, R. (1987). Emerging themes: The researcher's experience. Phenomenology & Pedagogy, 5, 230-241.
33.
Thorne, S. (1994). Secondary analysis in qualitative research: Issues and implications. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 263-279). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Thorne, S. (1997). The art (and science) of critiquing qualitative research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 117-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
