Closeness to Data: The Changing Goals of Qualitative Data Handling

Abstract

An essential goal of all qualitative researchers is getting close to data. Recently, that goal has gained prominence without critical examination. Pursuit of closeness poses risks and requires careful specification. This article identifies four very different meanings of "closeness to data." Although being close to data in each of these senses is essential to researchers, the challenge of getting distance is critical to good analysis and far more difficult. Recent changes in the literature, especially on qualitative computing, have not addressed the balance of closeness and distance. Tools for either purpose too often require that data be kept in ways that are flat and static. The author concludes that the challenge defining the next generation of method writing and software development is the ability to support qualitative researchers in achieving distance and maintaining the vitality of data.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agar, M. (1991). The right brain strikes back. In R. Fielding & R. Lee (Eds.), Using computers in qualitative analysis (pp. 181-194). London: Sage Ltd.

Bryman, A. , & Burgess, R. G. (Eds.). (1995). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge.

Coffey, A. , & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fielding, R. , & Lee, R. (Eds.). (1991). Using computers in qualitative analysis. London: Sage Ltd.

Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage Ltd.

Miles, M. B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590-601.

Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.

Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Morse, J. M. (1994). Emerging from the data? The cognitive processes in qualitative inquiry. En J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Richards, L. (1997a). User's mistake as developer's challenge. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 406-416.

13.

Richards, L. (1997b). Computers and qualitative analysis. In The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

14.

Richards, L. , & Richards, T. (1994a). Using computers in qualitative analysis. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 445-462). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Richards, L. , & Richards, T. (1994b). From filing cabinet to computer. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 146-172). London: Routledge.

16.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Strauss, A. L. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 7-18.

18.

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Basingstoke, UK: Falmer.

19.

Turner, B. A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis. Quality and Quantity, 15, 225-247.

20.

Weitzman, E. , & Miles, M. B. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

21.

Znanieski, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.