A framework for synthesizing qualitative findings is described, and issues surrounding employment of this technique are discussed. Further debate on these issues is encouraged to develop and refine this framework. The practical importance of interpretive meta-synthesis is highlighted in relation to theory development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Duffy, M. (1987). Methodological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image, 19(3), 130-133.
2.
Dzurec, L. , & Abraham, I. (1993). The nature of inquiry: Linking quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(1), 73-79.
3.
Estabrooks, C. , Field, P. A., & Morse, J. (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4), 503-511.
4.
Field, P. A. , & Marck, P. (1994). Uncertain motherhood: Negotiating risk in the childbearing years. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Guba, E. G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
7.
Knafl, K. , & Breitmayer, B. (1991). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 209-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Jensen, L. , & Allen, M. (1994). A synthesis of qualitative research in wellness-illness. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4), 349-369.
9.
LeCompte, M. D. , & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
10.
Morse, J. M. , & Johnson J. L. (1991). The illness experience. Dimensions in suffering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Noblit, G. W. , & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Ricoeur, P. (1983). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.
14.
Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 1-8.
15.
Schwandt, T. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Stern, P. (1994). Eroding grounded theory. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 212-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
