Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The most frequent concern in qualitative research is an inadequate description of the analysis process, and the consequent limitation on credibility and usefulness of the results. Of all the aspects of using the focus group technique—advantages and limitations, logistics, implementation, and interpreting and reporting of results—the process of analysis is the least agreed on and the least well developed. There is little guidance for researchers, journal editors and reviewers, graduate students and their advisors. A frequent question is "how to do" analysis of focus group data, especially analysis worthy of federal-level funding or acceptable at the level of an academic dissertation. Definitive, mutually agreed on technique does not exist. Decisions in analysis depend on many factors, and this article will discuss considerations in planning and implementing analyses of focus group data.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carey, M. A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Carey, M. A. , & Smith, M. W. (1994). Keeping the group in focus in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 123-127.

Carley, K. (1990). Content analysis. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Simpson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Elmsford, NY Pergamon.

Clogg, C. , & Shihadeh, E. (1994) Statistical models for ordinal variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

DiLeonardi, D. , & Kurtes, P. (1988). What to do when the numbers come in: A user's guide to statistical analysis in human services. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

Janis, L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Knoke, D. , & Burke, P. (1980). Log-linear models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.

Merton, R. , Fiske, M. , & Kendall, P. (1956). The focussed interview. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

11.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.

12.

Miles, M. , & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Morse, J. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147-149.

14.

O'Brien, K. (1993). Improving survey questionnaire through focus groups. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 105-117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

15.

Reissman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA; Sage.

16.

Silverman, J. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

17.

van Manen, M. (1990). Researching the lived experience. London, Ontario: Althouse.

Comment: Concerns in the Analysis of Focus Group Data

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References