The Missing Voice in Interdisciplinary Communication

Abstract

The research problem investigated in this article emerged from a year-long ethnographic study of the interdisciplinary process of teams evaluating children for mental retardation/developmental disabilities. The researchers noticed that when a discipline was not present at team meetings, others attempted to speak for it. This article examines the team process and case consequences of such a "missing voice." Data collected through participant observation and videotaping were triangulated with transcripts, written and audiovisual records, and an interview with the missing team member. This process revealed a trail of ambiguous findings and uncertainty on the part of team members of disciplines related to that of the missing member. The "missing" member identified the knowledge, assessment skills, and theoretical perspective she could have contributed if consulted. The findings demonstrate that (a) team members bring differing knowledge and observational perspectives and (b) team deliberations appear to be a function of who is present and what is negotiated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ducanis, A. J. , & Golin, A. K. (1979). The interdisciplinary health care team. London: Aspen Systems Corporation.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research in teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.

Germain, C. B. (1984). Social work practice in health care: An ecological perspective. New York: Free Press.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Golin, A. K. , & Ducanis, A. J. (1981). The interdisciplinary team: A handbook for the education of exceptional children. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.

Goodenough, W. H. (1970). Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.

Green, J. L. (1983). Research in teaching as a linguistic process: A state of the art. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 10, pp. 151-252). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Green, J. L. , & Wallat, C. (1981). Mapping instructional conversations—A sociolinguistic ethnography. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161-205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Kane, R. A. (1975). The interprofessional team as a small group. Social Work in Health Care, 1, 19-32.

10.

Kane, R. A. (1983). Interprofessional teamwork. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Social Work.

11.

Lincoln,Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

12.

Mailick, M. D. , & Ashley, A. A. (1981). Politics of interprofessional collaboration: Challenge to advocacy. Social Casework, 62, 131-137.

13.

McClelland, M. I. (1990). The discourse of interdisciplinary health care assessment: Toward a biosocial model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.

14.

Mehan, H. (1983). The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making. Language and Society, 12, 187-211.

15.

Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

16.

Nagi, S. Z. (1975). Teamwork in health care in the US.: A sociological perspective. MMFQ/Health and Society, 53(1), 75-91.

17.

Parker, A. W. (1972). The team approach to primary health care. Berkeley: University of California, University Extension.

18.

Polliack, M. R. (1978). Teamwork in family medicine. In J. H. Medalie (Ed.), Application of selected principles in family practice (pp. 295-299). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

19.

Sacks, O. (1989). Seeing voices: A journey into the world of the deaf. Berkeley: University of California Press.

20.

Sampson, E. E. , & Marthas, M. (1981). Group process for the health professions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

21.

Sands, R. G. (1989). The social worker joins the team: A look at the socialization process. Social Work in Health Care, 14, 1-15.

22.

Sands, R. G. , & McClelland, M. (1989). The emic/etic distinction in ethnographic research: An interdisciplinary perspective. In J. L. Green (Chair), Roles of ethnography in education. Symposium conducted at the 10th Annual University of Pennsylvania Ethnography in Education Research Forum, Philadelphia.

23.

Sands, R. G. , Stafford, J. , & McClelland, M. (1990). "I beg to differ": Conflict in the interdisciplinary team. Social Work in Health Care, 14, 55-72.

24.

Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

25.

Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Tannen, D. , & Wallat, C. (1983). Doctor/mother/child communication: linguistic analysis of a pediatric interaction. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication (pp. 203-219). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

27.

Tannen, D. , & Wallat, C. (1986). Medical professionals and parents: A linguistic analysis of communication across contexts. Language and Society, 15, 295-312.

28.

Tannen, D. , & Wallat, C. (1987). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 205-216.