Covering your Back: Strategies for Qualitative Research in Clinical Settings

Abstract

Evaluating or analyzing clinical practice often involves an analysis of the social context of care. This has created research opportunities for health sociologists to work on multidisciplinary teams with clinicians. This article gives an account of the methodological strategies that were necessary for completing a critical, qualitative study of the social impact of echocardiography (cardiac ultrasound) when used to diagnose patients as normal. The biggest problem was that physicians saw qualitative research methods as "subjective," hence prone to bias. Highly structured methods of analyzing qualitative data were effectively used to reassure physicians concerned about researcher bias. Such methods of analysis are probably necessary for "covering one's back" in multidisciplinary teams and they can coexist with a more theoretically based sociological analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bury, M. R. (1986). Social constructionism and the development of medical sociology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8(2), 137-169.

Daly, J. (1989). Innocent murmurs: Echocardiography and the diagnosis of cardiac normality. Sociology of Health and Illness, 11(2), 99-116.

Daly, J. , & McDonald, I. (1992). Echocardiography and the diagnosis of the normal patient: Opening Pandora's box? Manuscript submitted to the Australian Institute of Health, Canberra.

Elinson, J. (1985). The end of medicine and the end of medical sociology. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 26, 268-275.

Feinstein, A. R. (1976). "Compliance bias" and the interpretation of therapeutic trials. In D. L. Sackett & R. B. Hanes (Eds.), Compliance with therapeutic regimens (pp. 152-168). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Feinstein, A. R. (1983). An additional basic science for clinical medicine: I. The constraining fundamental paradigms. Annals of Internal Medicine, 99, 393-397.

Gifford, S. (1986). The meaning of lumps: A case study in the ambiguities of risk. In C. Janes , R. Stall , & S. Gifford (Eds.), Anthropology and epidemiology. Boston: D. Reidel.

Kessel, N. (1979, May 26). Reassurance. Lancet, pp. 1128-1133.

Koutroulis, G. (1990). The orifice revisited: Women in gynecological texts. Community Health Studies, 14(1), 73-84.

10.

Levine, S. (1987). The changing terrains in medical sociology: Emergent concerns with quality of life. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 28, 1-6.

11.

McDonald, I. G. , Guyatt, G. H. , Gutman, J. M. , Jelinek, V.M.J. , Fox, P. , & Daly, J. (1988). The contribution of a non-invasive test to clinical care. The impact of echocardiography on diagnosis, management and patient anxiety. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41(2), 151-162.

12.

Miles, M. , & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Silverman, D. (1989). Telling convincing stories: A plea for cautious positivism in case-studies. In B. Glasner & J. D. Moreno (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative distinction in the social sciences (pp. 57-77). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

14.

Sybylla, R. (1990). Old plans, new specifications: A political reading of the medical discourse of menopause. Australian Family Studies, 12, 95-107.

15.

Tuckett, D. , Boulton, M. , Olson, C. , & Williams, A. (1985). Meetings between experts: An approach to sharing ideas in medical consultations. London: Tavistock

16.

Warwick, H.M.C. , & Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Reassurance. British Medical Journal, 290, 1028.

17.

Willis, E. (1989). Medical dominance (rev. ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.