This study aimed to explore how young people identify and interpret disasters to provide a youth-centered and culturally sensitive understanding of resilience and preparedness. Utilizing Photovoice narrated by undergraduate students in Türkiye, disasters were conceptualized not merely as physical events but as emotionally, symbolically, and socially disruptive experiences. Using participant-generated photographs and focus group discussions, a reflexive thematic analysis created three interrelated themes: disasters as existential and symbolic rupture; post-disaster psychological and social reconstruction; and social responsibility and preparedness. These demonstrate that young people experience disasters as complex processes involving trauma, loss, solidarity, ethical reflection, and collective meaning-making. Instead of framing hope and love as discrete emotional expressions, analysis highlighted them as relational and moral orientations that emerge within post-disaster social contexts. The findings underscore the importance of integrating emotional, ethical, and experiential perspectives into disaster education and preparedness frameworks to support more inclusive and resilient communities.
AbdullahK.SofyanD. (2023). Building resilient societies through a holistic approach to disaster management: A perspective article. Journal of Metrics Studies and Social Science, 2(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmsss.v2i1.499
2.
Aitsi-SelmiA.EgawaS.SasakiH.WannousC.MurrayV. (2015). The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: Renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0050-9
3.
AmriA.HaynesK.BirdD. K.RonanK. (2018). Bridging the divide between studies on disaster risk reduction education and child-centred disaster risk reduction: A critical review. Children’s Geographies, 16(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2017.1358448
4.
AnnangL.WilsonS.TinagoC.Wright SandersL.BevingtonT.CarlosB.CorneliusE.SvendsenE. (2015). Photovoice: Assessing the long-term impact of a disaster on a community’s quality of life. Qualitative Health Research, 26(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576495
5.
Appleby-ArnoldS.BrockdorffN.JakovljevI.ZdravkovićS. (2018). Applying cultural values to encourage disaster preparedness: Lessons from a low-hazard country. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.015
6.
BerrebiC.KarlinskyA.YonahH. (2021). Individual and community behavioral responses to natural disasters. Nat Hazards, 105, 1541–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04365-2
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
9.
BrayA.OrchistonC.ShresthaS. (2023). Using photovoice for disaster and hazard preparedness: A methodological review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 93, Article 103742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103742
10.
CarlsonE. D.EngebretsonJ.ChamberlainR. M. (2006). Photovoice as a social process of critical consciousness. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287525
11.
CitraningtyasT.MacdonaldE.RaphaelB. (2010). Disaster experience in the context of life: Perspectives five to six years after the 2003 Canberra Bushfire. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33151/AJP.8.2.102
12.
CoxR.HillT.PlushT.HeykoopC.TremblayC. (2019). More than a checkbox: Engaging youth in disaster risk reduction and resilience in Canada. Natural Hazards, 98(1), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3509-3
13.
EggersM. (2025). Photovoice. In Creswell BáezJ. (Ed.), Issues of equity: Key concepts in qualitative methods (pp. 26–29). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003560128
14.
Evans-AgnewR. A.RosembergM. A. S. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: Whose voice?Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315624223
15.
Evans-AgnewR. A.SanonM. A.BoutainD. M. (2014). Critical research methodologies and social justice issues: A methodological example using photovoice. In KaganP. N.SmithM. C.ChinnP. L. (Eds.), Philosophies and practices of emancipatory nursing: Social justice as praxis (pp. 136–149). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069097-11
16.
GoldenT. (2020). Reframing photovoice: Building on the method to develop more equitable and responsive research practices. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320905564
17.
GörgünC.McLennanJ. (2024). Earthquake risk perception and preparedness following the Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquake of 6 February 2023. Afet ve Risk Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1389231
18.
HancockM.AmankwaaL.RevellM.MuellerD. (2016). Focus group data saturation: A new approach to data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(11), 2124–2130. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2330
19.
HergenratherK. C.RhodesS. D.CowanC. A.BardhoshiG.PulaS. (2009). Photovoice as community-based participatory research: A qualitative review. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(6), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.33.6.6
20.
IglesiasV.BraswellA. E.RossiM. W.JosephM.McShaneC.CattauM.TravisW. R.McGlinchyJ.NagyR. C.BalchJ.LeykS. (2021). Risky development: Increasing exposure to natural hazards in the United States. Earth’s Future, 9(7), Article e2020EF001795. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001795
21.
JayawickremeE.InfurnaF. J.AlajakK.BlackieL. E. R.ChopikW. J.ChungJ. M.DorfmanA.FleesonW.ForgeardM. J. C.FrazierP.FurrR. M.GrossmannI.HellerA. S.LaceulleO. M.LucasR. E.LuhmannM.LuongG.MeijerL.McLeanK. C.ZonneveldR. (2021). Post‐traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12591
22.
KarakaşH.TözünM. (2024). Relationship between disaster literacy and the factors affecting it and the state-trait anxiety in the elderly of West Turkey. Osmangazi Journal of Medicine, 46(4), Article 599. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1456174
23.
KoutraK.KokaliariE. (2025). Photovoice: A method to empower vulnerable populations. In BaikadyR.SajidS.NadesanV.PrzeperskiJ.IslamS. (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of global social problems (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_583-1
24.
LaiB.LewisR.LivingsM.La GrecaA.EsnardA. (2017). Posttraumatic stress symptom trajectories among children after disaster exposure: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 30(6), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22242
25.
LukM.LongmanJ. (2024). Young people’s experiences of the Northern Rivers 2017 flood and its effects on their mental health. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 32(2), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13095
26.
ManyenaS.FordhamM.CollinsA. (2008). Disaster resilience and children: Managing food security in Zimbabwe’s Binga District. Children, Youth, and Environments, 18(1), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2008.0037
27.
NanudM.CaylanA.LaguraJ.BaluyosG. (2023). Capturing the cry of flood victim students: An exploration of their experience and resilience through photovoice. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(4), 524–542. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline2034
28.
NassarS.HossainM.NaárZ.VasaL. (2025). Factors affecting humanitarian resilience: A mediating approach of community engagement. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame8120251106
29.
O’ReillyM.ParkerN. (2013). ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106
30.
PickeringC.Al-BaldawiZ.McVeanL.AmanyR.AdanM.BakerL.Al-BaldawiZ.O’SullivanT. (2022). “It’s like youth are talking into a microphone that is not plugged in”: Engaging youth in disaster risk reduction through photovoice. Qualitative Health Research, 32(14), 2126–2146. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221136485
31.
PoortingaW. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health & Place, 18(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.017
RenZ.GuoJ.YangC. (2020). Loss of homeland: A qualitative study of the changes in perception of relocated Sichuan earthquake survivors with posttraumatic stress disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), Article 392. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12888-020-02789-5
34.
SumathipalaA.JafareyA. (2010). Ethics of disaster management, clinical care and research. Asian Bioethics Review, 2(2), 105–107. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/416385.
35.
UNDRR. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction.
WangC.BurrisM. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
38.
YariA.ArdalanA.OstadtaghizadehA.ZarezadehY.BoubakranM.BidarpoorF.RahimiforoushaniA. (2019). Underlying factors affecting death due to flood in Iran: A qualitative content analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40, Article 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101258
