Resistance Among Youths With Mental Illnesses in China in the Context of Parent–Child Relationships: The Integration of Modern and Postmodern Perspectives
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Resistance Among Youths With Mental Illnesses in China in the Context of Parent–Child Relationships: The Integration of Modern and Postmodern Perspectives
Research has revealed an unprecedentedly high rate of various mental illnesses among Chinese youth, which indicates that it is of paramount importance to probe the psychological well-being of this population. For youth, having conflicts with their parents is considered to trigger mental health issues. During this process, parents may attempt to guide, influence, and control these young people, while the youth themselves may resist their parents to seek autonomy and develop their own competence. However, this study revealed a more complex and nuanced phenomenon, as the youth not only resisted their parents but also resisted the power of discourses, and their mental illnesses served as a reification of their resistance. To delineate this circumstance, the study adopts a qualitative paradigm, endorsing a novel theoretical stance that integrates resistance in modernism and postmodernism. A dyadic interview and analysis were conducted with 16 family pairs that involved youth aged 16–24 years during their treatment in an inpatient unit at a grade-A tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China. Four main themes were identified: (a) resisting the beliefs that emphasize closeness, (b) resisting the discourse of education, (c) resisting the discourse of hardship tolerance, and (d) resisting the public belief in slenderness. The narratives of parents and youth highlight how youths’ rebellions occur in daily interactions, where their resistance involves not only their parents but also elusive social powerfull.
AssadiS. M.SmetanaJ.ShahmansouriN.MohammadiM. (2011). Beliefs about parental authority, parenting styles, and parent‐adolescent conflict among Iranian mothers of middle adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411409121
Binah-PollakA. (2014). Discourses and practices of child-rearing in China: The bio-power of parenting in Beijing. China Information, 28(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x13517617
4.
BlackmanS. J. (2005). Youth subcultural theory: A critical engagement with the concept, its origins and politics, from the Chicago school to postmodernism. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500063629
5.
BottrellD. (2007). Resistance, resilience and social identities: Reframing ‘problem youth’ and the problem of schooling. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(5), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260701602662
6.
BrauerJ. R. (2017). Cultivating conformists or raising rebels? Connecting parental control and autonomy support to adolescent delinquency. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(2), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12283
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
8.
BugentalD. B.GrusecJ. E. (2007). Socialization processes. In EisenbergN.DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 366–428). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0307
9.
BurckC. (2005). Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: The use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 27(3), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00314.x
10.
ChaoR. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00806.x
11.
CollaçoN.WaglandR.AlexisO.GavinA.GlaserA.WatsonE. K. (2021). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative dyadic data in health research. Qualitative Health Research, 31(8), 1555–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211011599
12.
CoxM. J.PaleyB. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01259
13.
CreswellJ.PothC. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
14.
CumsilleP.DarlingN.MartínezM. L. (2010). Shading the truth: The patterning of adolescents’ decisions to avoid issues, disclose, or lie to parents. Journal of Adolescence, 33(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.008
15.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1986). Nomadology: The war machine. Semiotext.
16.
De SpiegeleerF.FlamantN.Van PetegemS.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2025). Adolescents’ coping with overprotective parenting: A person-centered approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 34(6), 1604–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-025-03073-4
17.
DowningL. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to Michel Foucault. Cambridge Press.
18.
EisikovitsZ.KorenC. (2010). Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1642–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376520
19.
FanH.ZhangB.WangW. (2017). Family functions in relation to behavioral and psychological disorders in Chinese culture. The Family Journal, 25(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717697681
20.
FlamantN.HaerensL.MabbeE.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2020). How do adolescents deal with intrusive parenting? The role of coping with psychologically controlling parenting in internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Adolescence, 84(1), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.09.003
21.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction. Vintage Books.
GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. (2016). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet, 388(10053), 1545–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6
HaganJ.FosterH. (2003). S/he’s a rebel: Toward a sequential stress theory of delinquency and gendered pathways to disadvantage in emerging adulthood. Social Forces, 82(1), 53–86. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0091
26.
HanM.ShiX.XiongD.ZhangX.ShenX.WuN.WangJ.SunJ. (2023). The status and influencing factors of adolescents’ mental health in a province of China: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 321, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.024
27.
HoD. (1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(3), 347–365.
JarrettM.SiddiquiS.LochmanJ.QuL. (2014). Internalizing problems as a predictor of change in externalizing problems in at-risk youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.764823
30.
JiD.MarshallS. K.CharlesG. (2025). Dyadic resistance in parent‐adolescent interactions during the transition to high school. Journal of Adolescence, 97(3), 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12451
31.
JohanssonT.LalanderP. (2012). Doing resistance–youth and changing theories of resistance. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(8), 1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693591
32.
KallioH.PietiläA. M.JohnsonM.KangasniemiM. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
33.
KellyM.CoughlanB. (2019). A theory of youth mental health recovery from a parental perspective. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 24(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12300
34.
KielingC.BuchweitzC.CayeA.SilvaniJ.AmeisS. H.BrunoniA. R.CostK. T.CourtneyD. B.GeorgiadesK.MerikangasK. R.HendersonJ. L.PolanczykG. V.RohdeL. A.SalumG. A.& SzatmariP. (2024). Worldwide prevalence and disability from mental disorders across childhood and adolescence: Evidence from the global burden of disease study. JAMA Psychiatry, 81(4), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5051
35.
KimS. Y.ZhangM.HouY.ShenY. (2020). Acculturation, parent–child relationships, and mental health of adolescents in Chinese and Mexican immigrant families. In Nagayama HallG. C. (Ed.), Mental and behavioral health of immigrants in the United States (pp. 25–44). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816117-3.00002-6
36.
KuczynskiL. (2003). Beyond bidirectionality: Bilateral conceptual frameworks for understanding dynamics in parent-child relations. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent–child relations (pp. 3–24). Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229645.n1
37.
KuczynskiL.BurkeT.Song‐ChoiP. (2021). Mothers’ perspectives on resistance and defiance in middle childhood: Promoting autonomy and social skill. Social Sciences, 10(12), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120469
38.
KuczynskiL.MolJ. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 326–368). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy109
39.
LiF.CuiY.LiY.GuoL.KeX.LiuJ.LuoX.ZhengY.LeckmanJ. F. (2022). Prevalence of mental disorders in school children and adolescents in China: Diagnostic data from detailed clinical assessments of 17,524 individuals. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13445
40.
LiuS.WangH. (2024). Chinese people’s child bearing and rearing beliefs: The interplay between Confucianism and neoliberalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 55(6), 638–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241248596
41.
LukesS. (2005). Power: A radical review (2nd ed.). Palgrave MacMillan.
42.
MacDonaldE. (1991). The Trouble with Subjects: Feminism, Marxism and the Questions of Poststructuralism. Studies in Political Economy, 35(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.1991.11675452
43.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323156174
McHoulA.GraceW. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Routledge.
46.
NicholsM. P.DavisS. D. (2021). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Pearson Press.
47.
NucciL.SmetanaJ. G. (1996). Mothers’ concepts of young children’s areas of personal freedom. Child Development, 67(4), 1870–1886. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131737
48.
NucciL.WeberE. K. (1995). Social interactions in the home and the development of young children’s conceptions of the personal. Child Development, 66(5), 1438–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00944.x
49.
PengB.HuN.YuH.XiaoH.LuoJ. (2021). Parenting style and adolescent mental health: The chain mediating effects of self-esteem and psychological inflexibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 738170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738170
PortaS. D.HoweN. (2012). Assessing mothers’ and children’s perceptions of power through personal, conventional, and prudential conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2012.0024
RitzerG.StepniskyJ. (2018). Sociological theory (10th ed.). Sage Publications.
54.
RoulstonK. (2011). Working through challenges in doing interview research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(4), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000404
55.
ScottJ. (2001). Power. Polity Press.
56.
ScottJ. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
57.
SharmaN.ChakrabartiS.GroverS. (2016). Gender differences in caregiving among family-caregivers of people with mental illnesses. World Journal of Psychiatry, 6(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.7
58.
SharpeJ.RoutledgeP.PhiloC.PaddisonR. (2000). Entanglements of power: Geographies of domination/resistance. In PhiloC.RoutledgeP.SharpeJ. P.PaddisonR. (Eds.), Entanglements of power: Geographies of domination/resistance (pp. 1–42). Routledge.
59.
TukE.YangK. W. (2013). Introduction to youth resistance research and theories of change. In TukE.YangW. (Eds.), Youth resistance research and theories of change (pp. 10–25). Routledge.
60.
Van PetegemS.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.BeyersW. (2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self‐determination theory. Child Development, 86(3), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12355
61.
WatsonW. H. (2012). Family system. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 184–193). Academic Press.
62.
WongD. F. K.ChengC. W.ZhuangX. Y.NgT. K.PanS. M.HeX.PoonA. (2017). Comparing the mental health literacy of Chinese people in Australia, China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: Implications for mental health promotion. Psychiatry Research, 256, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.032
63.
WuC.ChaoR. K. (2011). Intergenerational cultural dissonance in parent–adolescent relationships among Chinese and European Americans. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021063
Zahn-WaxlerC.Klimes–DouganB.SlatteryM. J. (2000). Internalizing problems of childhood and adolescence: Prospects, pitfalls, and progress in understanding the development of anxiety and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 12(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400003102
66.
ZhaoX.SelmanR. L.LukeA. (2018). Academic competition and parental practice: A study of habitus and change. In MuG. M.DooleyK.LukeA. (Eds.), Bourdieu and Chinese education (pp. 144–174). Routledge.
