Wide-Ranging Responses to Temporary Abstinence Challenges Among UK-Based Heavier Drinkers: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Abstract

Temporary abstinence challenges (TACs) encouraging people to abstain from alcohol for typically 1 month time periods have acquired considerable popularity. TACs may promote longer-term reductions in alcohol consumption, but it is unclear how TACs influence behavior changes and whether positive changes are held among adults identifiable as relatively heavy drinkers. Drawing on a UK-based sample of six heavier drinkers, we measured self-reported alcohol consumption and drink-refusal self-efficacy and conducted interviews at three timepoints: pre-TAC participation (T1), and immediately following (T2) and 6 months post-TAC (T3) participation. Using longitudinal interpretative phenomenological analysis, an analytic technique for understanding change over time, and via integration with quantitative self-report measures, we identified three patterns of evidence about longer-term change (or not) in alcohol use linked to TAC participation: “mainly clear change,” “unclear/complicated change,” and “no change or limited change,” each with narrative illustrations from two participants. We found evidence of greater reflection about alcohol consumption at T2 and lower levels of T3 alcohol intake among four of six participants. For some, TAC participation revealed downsides of drinking, and linked participation to reductions in their alcohol consumption. However, other interviews suggested ambivalence about and “backfire effects” associated with TAC participation, in that positives of alcohol consumption were highlighted, with apparently linked negligible changes in consumption practices. Research implications suggest that inoculation against renewed alcohol appreciation may strengthen TAC campaign successes. Future research must test the tenability of our identified trajectories and explore, experimentally, drinking trajectories among registered versus unregistered TAC participants.

Keywords

alcohol temporary abstinence challenges Dry January sobriety longitudinal interpretative phenomenological analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alcohol Change UK . (2020). Press release: 6.5 million people plan to do Dry January 2021, up from 3.9 million in 2020. https://alcoholchange.org.uk/blog/press-release-6-5-million-people-plan-to-do-dry-january-2021-up-from-3-9-million-in-2020

Alcohol Change UK . (2023). The Dry January story. https://alcoholchange.org.uk/help-and-support/managing-your-drinking/dry-january/about-dry-january/the-dry-january-story

Australian Bureau of Statistics . (2023). Causes of death, Australia 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/causes-death-australia/2022

Bartram

Eliott

Crabb

(2017). ‘Why can’t I just not drink?’ A qualitative study of adults’ social experiences of stopping or reducing alcohol consumption. Drug and Alcohol Review, 36(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12461

Butters

Kersbergen

Holmes

Field

(2023). Temporary abstinence challenges: What do we need to know? Drug and Alcohol Review, 42(5), 1087–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13625

Cheers

Callinan

Pennay

(2020). The ‘sober eye’: Examining attitudes towards non-drinkers in Australia. Psychology & Health, 36(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1792905

Conroy

de Visser

R. O.

(2013). ‘Man up!’: Discursive constructions of non-drinkers among UK undergraduates. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(11), 1432–1444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105312463586

Conroy

de Visser

R. O.

(2014). Being a non-drinking student: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology & Health, 29(5), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2013.866673

Conroy

de Visser

R. O.

(2018). Benefits and drawbacks of social non‐drinking identified by British university students. Drug and Alcohol Review, 37(Suppl 1), S89–S97. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12610

10.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

11.

Davidson

H. R.

Gelles

Keller

K. R.

Zajdel

Koehly

L. M.

(2024). Becoming a rare disease parent: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of parent-caregivers’ postpartum experiences. Qualitative Health Research, 34(1–2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231205419

12.

de Visser

R. O.

(2020). Young people and temporary alcohol abstinence during Dry January. In Conroy

Measham

(Eds.), Young adult drinking styles: Current perspectives on research, policy and practice (pp. 253–272). Palgrave Macmillan.

13.

de Visser

R. O.

Nicholls

(2020). Temporary abstinence during Dry January: Predictors of success; impact on well-being and self-efficacy. Psychology & Health, 35(11), 1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1743840

14.

de Visser

R. O.

Piper

(2020). Short- and longer-term benefits of temporary alcohol abstinence during ‘Dry January’ are not also observed among adult drinkers in the general population: Prospective cohort study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 55(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaa025

15.

de Visser

R. O.

Robinson

Bond

(2016). Voluntary temporary abstinence from alcohol during “Dry January” and subsequent alcohol use. Health Psychology, 35(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000297

16.

DrinkAware . (2023). The sober myth: Are young adults really a generation of non-drinkers? https://www.drinkaware.co.uk/research/research-and-evaluation-reports/the-sober-myth-are-young-adults-really-a-generation-of-non-drinkers/

17.

Dry July . (2014). Annual report 2013-14 Australia. https://www.dryjuly.com/about/impact-reports

18.

Farr

Nizza

I. E.

(2019). Longitudinal Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (LIPA): A review of studies and methodological considerations. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540677

19.

Frank

V. A.

Herold

M. D.

Schroder

Bjonness

Hunt

(2020). Legitimizing and negotiating abstinence: Young adults’ narratives about practicing situational and long term abstinence in Denmark. International Journal of Drug Policy, 81, Article 102655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102655

20.

Harrison

Kelly

Lindsay

Advocat

Hickey

(2011). ‘I don’t know anyone that has two drinks a day’: Young people, alcohol and the government of pleasure. Health, Risk & Society, 13(5), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2011.596190

21.

Jirarattanasopha

Witvorapong

Hanvoravongchai

(2019). Impact of Buddhist Lent Dry Campaign on alcohol consumption behaviour: A community level study. Health and Social Care in the Community, 27(4), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12702

22.

Månsson

Bogren

(2014). Health, risk, and pleasure: The formation of gendered discourses on women’s alcohol consumption. Addiction Research & Theory, 22(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2012.737874

23.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence . (2023). Alcohol - problem drinking. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/alcohol-problem-drinking/

24.

NHS England . (2024). Health survey for England, 2022 Part 1. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2022-part-1/adult-drinking

25.

Nizza

I. E.

Smith

J. A.

Kirkham

J. A.

(2018). ‘Put the illness in a box’: A longitudinal interpretative phenomenological analysis of changes in a sufferer’s pictorial representations of pain following participation in a pain management programme. British Journal of Pain, 12(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463717738804

26.

Office for National Statistics . (2024). Alcohol-specific deaths in the UK: Registered in 2022. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/bulletins/alcoholrelateddeathsintheunitedkingdom/registeredin2022

27.

Quilico

E. L.

Harvey

W. J.

Caron

J. G.

Bloom

G. A.

(2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis of community exercise experiences after severe traumatic brain injury. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(5), 800–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1778064

28.

Robert

(2016). Temporary sobriety initiatives as public pedagogy: Windows of opportunity for embodied learning. Health, 20(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459315600772

29.

Robert

(2018). Meeting the sober self, recognizing the drinking self: Back to baseline experimentation in temporary sobriety initiatives. Contemporary Drug Problems, 45(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450918769078

30.

Robert

(2022). Alcohol, binge sobriety and exemplary abstinence. Bloomsbury Academic.

31.

Siconolfi

Tucker

J. S.

Pedersen

E. R.

Perez

L. G.

Dunbar

M. S.

Davis

J. P.

Rodriguez

Seelam

D’Amico

E. J.

(2024). Sober curiosity and participation in temporary alcohol abstinence challenges in a cohort of U.S. emerging adults. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 85(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00137

32.

Smith

J. A.

(1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 11(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449608400256

33.

Smith

J. A.

(2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659

34.

Smith

J. A.

(2018). “Yes it is phenomenological”: A reply to Max Van Manen’s critique of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 28(12), 1955–1958. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318799577

35.

Smith

J. A.

Flowers

Larkin

(2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). Sage.

36.

Spiers

Smith

J. A.

Drage

(2016). A longitudinal interpretative phenomenological analysis of the process of kidney recipients’ resolution of complex ambiguities within relationships with their living donors. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(11), 2600–2611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315581070

37.

Tashakkori

Teddlie

(2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioural sciences: US perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570305055

38.

Thienpondt

Van Cauwenberg

Van Damme

Deforche

(2024). Process evaluation of the Belgian one-month-without alcohol campaign ‘Tournée Minérale’: A mixed method approach. BMC Public Health, 24(1), Article 383. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17941-z

39.

UK Parliament . (2012). Alcohol guidelines: Science and technology committee contents summary. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/1536/153603.htm

40.

Walsh

B. E.

Williams

C. M.

Zale

E. L.

(2022). Expectancies for and pleasure from simultaneous alcohol and e-cigarette use among young adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 57(14), 2101–2109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2136495

41.

Witvorapong

Watanapongvanich

(2020). Using pre-commitment to reduce alcohol consumption: Lessons from a quasi-experiment in Thailand. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70(1), Article 100723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.06.008

42.

World Health Organisation . (2024). Alcohol. Key facts. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/alcohol

43.

Young

R. M.

Oei

T. P. S.

Crook

G. M.

(1991). Development of a drinking self-efficacy questionnaire. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960735

44.

Zarzycki

Seddon

Petrovic

Morrison

(2024). Supporting individuals with an acquired brain injury: An interpretative phenomenological study exploring the everyday lives of caregivers. Qualitative Health Research, 34(14), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241242046