Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-4
“So,This Is Actually Going to Somebody,Right?”: Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning,Implementation,and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities
Community-engaged, participatory approaches to designing and evaluating public health initiatives center the experiences, perspectives, and knowledge of community members at every stage of the process. A peer support group for racialized and minoritized parents under 25 years of age in the northeastern United States was designed, facilitated, and evaluated with the participation of peer leaders who shared expertise and strategies for navigating complex albeit imperfect bureaucratic systems on which they depend for social services. This paper explores key tensions between the experiences and expectations of peer leaders and the academic researchers involved in the project, and examines the limitations of culturally responsive evaluation to address the structural constraints of the neoliberal university.
Abu-LughodL. (1991). Writing against culture. In FoxR. G. (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). School of American Research Press: Distributed by the University of Washington Press.
2.
AcreeJ.ChouinardJ. A. (2020). Exploring use and influence in culturally responsive approaches to evaluation: A review of the empirical literature. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019879505
3.
Baystate Medical Center. (2019). Community health needs assessment on Hampden County. Baystate Health.
4.
BerrymanM.SooHooS.NevinA. (2013). Culturally responsive methodologies. Emerald Group Publishing.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2024). A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International. Health Promotion International, 39(3), Article daae049. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049
7.
Call-CummingsM.MoneaB.DazzoG. P.BestA. L.GrayN.KalinichenkoO.KhalidW.KellerJ.DavisK. (2024). Youth-led research and the tensions between relational methodologies and fast methods: Learning and living in the in-between. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 24(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086231224757
8.
CashmanS. B.AdekyS.AllenA. J.CorburnJ.IsraelB. A.MontañoJ.RafelitoA.RhodesS. D.SwanstonS.WallersteinN.EngE. (2008). The power and the promise: Working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1407–1417. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.113571
Collins LovellC.GubriumA.SmythJ.ValdezE. S. (2025). “Playing the system”: Young parents’ advice to peers on navigating social service bureaucracy[Manuscript in preparation].
11.
Collins LovellC.Salerno ValdezE.ChanJ.BeatrizE.GubriumA. (2023). ‘It’s whether or not you got people’: School-based social support to address adolescent sexual and reproductive health inequities. Sex Education, 23(5), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2106560
12.
CoontzS. (1997). The way we really are: Coming to terms with America’s changing families. Basic Books.
DaviesB.BanselP. (2005). The time of their lives? Academic workers in neoliberal time(s). Health Sociology Review, 14(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.14.1.47
15.
DeanA. (2019). Colonialism, neoliberalism, and university-community engagement: What sorts of encounters with difference are our institutions prioritizing? In DeanA.JohnsonJ. L.LuhmannS. (Eds.), Feminist praxis revisited: Critical reflections on university-community engagement (pp. 23–37). Wilfrid Laurier Press. https://doi.org/10.51644/9781771123792-002
16.
DeviaC.BakerE. A.Sanchez-YoungmanS.BarnidgeE.GolubM.MottonF.MuhammadM.RuddockC.VicuñaB.WallersteinN. (2017). Advancing system and policy changes for social and racial justice: Comparing a rural and urban community-based participatory research partnership in the U.S. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0509-3
17.
DixonS. L.ValdezE. S.ChanJ.WeilM.FisherT.SimounA.EganJ.BeatrizE.GubriumA. (2025). Stacked up against us: Using Photovoice and participatory methods to explore structural racism’s impact on adolescent sexual and reproductive health inequities. Health Promotion Practice, 26(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241229641
18.
FarmerP. (1998). On suffering and structural violence: A view from below. In KleinmanA.DasV.LockM. M. (Eds.), Social suffering (pp. 261–284). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520353695-014
19.
FelnerJ. K. (2020). “You get a PhD and we get a few hundred bucks”: Mutual benefits in participatory action research?Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 549–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120902763
20.
FletcherF.HammerB.HibbertA. (2014). “We know we are doing something good, but what is it?”: The challenge of negotiating between service delivery and research in a CBPR project. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 7(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.54656/ZRYK7626
21.
FlickerS.TraversR.GutaA.McDonaldS.MeagherA. (2007). Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards. Journal of Urban Health, 84(4), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7
22.
FriersonH. T.HoodS.HughesG. (2002). Strategies that address culturally responsive evaluation. In JoyF. W. (Ed.) The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. (pp. 63–73). National Science Foundation. https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057.pdf
23.
HallJ. N.AventC. M.BoyceA. S.AcheampongK. O. (2023). Culturally responsive evaluation teaching and learning in higher education: A higher calling. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(180), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20574
24.
HerrickC.BellK. (2022). Concepts, disciplines and politics: On ‘structural violence’ and the ‘social determinants of health. Critical Public Health, 32(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1810637
25.
HolkupP. A.Tripp-ReimerT.SaloisE. M.WeinertC. (2004). Community-based participatory research: An approach to intervention research with a Native American community. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200407000-00002
26.
HoodS.FriersonH. T.HopsonR. K.ArbuthnotK. (Eds.). (2022). Race and culturally responsive inquiry in education: Improving research, evaluation, and assessment. Harvard Education Press.
27.
HoodS.HopsonR.KirkhartK. (2015). Culturally responsive evaluation. In NewcomerK. E.HatryH. P.WholeyJ. S. (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed., pp. 281–317). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch12
28.
hooksb. (2018). All about love: New visions. William Morrow, of Harper Collins Publishers.
29.
IsraelB. A. (Ed.). (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
30.
IsraelB. A.KriegerJ.VlahovD.CiskeS.FoleyM.FortinP.GuzmanJ. R.LichtensteinR.McGranaghanR.PalermoA.TangG. (2006). Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: Lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers. Journal of Urban Health, 83(6), 1022–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1
31.
JordanL. S.HallJ. N. (2023). Framing anticolonialism in evaluation: Bridging decolonizing methodologies and culturally responsive evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 19(44), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i44.769
32.
KernsS. E. U.MaddoxS. J.BerhanuR. E.AllanH.WilsonR. A.ChiesaA.Orsi-HuntR.McCarthyL. P.HenryL. J.SmithC. O. (2024). An equity-focused assessment of evidence-based parenting intervention research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 27(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00479-2
33.
KushnierL.NadinS.HillM. E.TaylorM.JunS.MushquashC. J.PuineanG.GokiertR. (2023). Culturally responsive evaluation: A scoping review of the evaluation literature. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100(2023), Article 102322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102322
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2021). Three decades of culturally relevant, responsive, & sustaining pedagogy: What lies ahead?The Educational Forum, 85(4), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1957632
35.
LazarusS.DuranB.CaldwellL.BulbuliS. (2012). Public health research and action: Reflections on challenges and possibilities of community-based participatory research. In MaddockJ. (Ed.), Public health—Social and behavioral health (pp. 310–324). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/38411
36.
MaloneA. (2020). Migrant communities and participatory research partnerships in the neoliberal university. Migration Letters, 17(2), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i2.805
37.
MayanM. J.DaumC. H. (2016). Worth the risk? Muddled relationships in community-based participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315618660
38.
McBrideD. F. (2011). Sociocultural theory: Providing more structure to culturally responsive evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2011(131), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.371
39.
MinklerM.WallersteinN. (2011). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.
40.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
RaddonM.-B.HarrisonB. A. (2015). Is service-learning the kind face of the neo-liberal university?Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v45i2.184393
44.
SpringettJ.WallersteinN. (2008). Issues in participatory evaluation. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (pp. 1–80). Jossey-Bass.
45.
ThomasV. G.BledsoeK. L. (2023). Calling it like we see it!: Our reflections, positionality, and vision for CRE’s future. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(180), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20573
46.
ValdezE. S.ChanJ.DixonS.CarrollG. D.PhuntsogT.DelormeE.EganJ.GubriumA. (2024). Participatory action research to explore the role of structural violence on marginalized and racialized young parents. Health Education & Behavior, 51(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981231197397
47.
ValdezE. S.ChanJ.DonisA.Collins-LovellC.DixonS.BeatrizE.GubriumA. (2023). Structural racism and its influence on sexual and reproductive health inequities among immigrant youth. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 25(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-022-01385-x
48.
ValdezE. S.DixonS.ChanJ.EvoraJ.PhuntsogT.DelormeE.EganJ.GubriumA. (2024). PAR to explore trust and mistrust of marginalized young parents as social service recipients. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 5, Article 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100445
49.
WallersteinN.OetzelJ. G.Sanchez-YoungmanS.BoursawB.DicksonE.KastelicS.KoegelP.LuceroJ. E.MagaratiM.OrtizK.ParkerM.PeñaJ.RichmondA.DuranB. (2020). Engage for equity: A long-term study of community-based participatory research and community-engaged research practices and outcomes. Health Education & Behavior, 47(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119897075
50.
WangC.BurrisM. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
51.
WilsonE.KennyA.Dickson-SwiftV. (2018). Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317690721
