Lesbian and queer women face unique experiences navigating cancer care, including challenges in accessing services that incorporate their relational supports. Given the importance of social support for survivorship, this study examines the impact of cancer on lesbian/queer women in romantic relationships. We conducted the seven stages of Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnography. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and Social Sciences Abstract databases were searched. Two hundred and ninety citations were initially identified, 179 abstracts were reviewed, and 20 articles were coded. Themes were (a) intersectionality of lesbian/queer identity in the cancer context; (b) institutional and systemic supports and barriers; (c) navigation of disclosure; (d) characteristics of affirmative cancer care; (e) survivors’ critical reliance on their partner(s); and (f) shifts in connection after cancer. Findings indicate the importance of accounting for intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and socio-cultural–political factors for understanding the impact of cancer for lesbian and queer women and their romantic partners. Affirmative cancer care for sexual minorities fully validates and integrates partners in care, removes heteronormative assumptions in services provided, and offers LGB+ patient and partner support services.
AbramsJ. A.TabaacA.JungS.Else-QuestN. M. (2020). Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research. Social Science & Medicine, 258, 113138. htps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138
2.
AtkinsS.LewinS.SmithH.EngelM.FretheimA.VolminkJ. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
3.
BaughmanA.ClarkM. A.BoehmerU. (2017). Experiences and concerns of lesbian, gay, or bisexual survivors of colorectal cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 44(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1188/17.ONF.350-357
4.
BlosnichJ. R.FarmerG. W.LeeJ. G. L.SilenzioV. M. B.BowenD. J. (2014). Health inequalities among sexual minority adults: Evidence from ten U.S. states, 2010. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.010
5.
BoehmerU.CaseP. (2004). Physicians don’t ask, sometimes patients tell: Disclosure of sexual orientation among women with breast carcinoma. Cancer, 101(8), 1882–1889. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20563
6.
BoehmerU.CaseP. (2007). Sexual minority women’s interactions with breast cancer providers. Women & Health, 44(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v44n02_03
7.
BoehmerU.ElkR. (2015). Cancer and the LGBT community: Unique perspectives from risk to survivorship. Springer International.
8.
BoehmerU.GlickmanM.WinterM.ClarkM. A. (2013). Breast cancer survivors of different sexual orientations: Which factors explain survivors’ quality of life and adjustment?Annals of Oncology, 24(6), 1622–1630. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt035
9.
BoehmerU.LindeR.FreundK. M. (2007). Breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: The decisions of sexual minority women. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 119(2), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246402.79334.3b
BootsmaT. I.SchellekensM. P. J.Van WoezikR. A. M.Van Der LeeM. L.SlatmanJ. (2020). Experiencing and responding to chronic cancer-related fatigue: A meta-ethnography of qualitative research. Psycho-Oncology, 29(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5213
12.
BristoweK.HodsonM.WeeB.AlmackK.JohnsonK.DavesonB. A.KoffmanJ.McEnhillL.HardingR. (2018). Recommendations to reduce inequalities for LGBT people facing advanced illness: ACCESSCare national qualitative interview study. Palliative Medicine, 32(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317705102
13.
BrittenN.CampbellR.PopeC.DonovanJ.MorganM.PillR. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesize qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(4), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581902320432732
14.
BrownM. T.McElroyJ. A. (2018)a. Unmet support needs of sexual and gender minority breast cancer survivors. Support Cancer Care, 26(4), 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3941-z
15.
BrownM. T.McElroyJ. A. (2018)b. Sexual and gender minority breast cancer patients choosing bilateral mastectomy without reconstruction: "I now have a body that fits me". Women & health, 58(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2017.1310169
DibbleS. L.RobertsS. A. (2002). A comparison of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment between lesbian and heterosexual women. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 6(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020384614817
18.
DudenG. S. (2021). Challenges to qualitative evidence synthesis – Aiming for diversity and abstracting without losing meaning. Methods in Psychology, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100070
19.
FishJ.WilliamsonI. (2018). Exploring lesbian, gay and bisexual patients’ accounts of their experiences of cancer care in the UK. European Journal of Cancer Care, 27(1),Article e12501. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12501
20.
FishJ.WilliamsonI.BrownJ. (2019). Disclosure in lesbian, gay and bisexual cancer care: Towards a salutogenic healthcare environment. BMC Cancer, 19(1), 678. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5895-7
21.
FranceE. F.RingN.NoyesJ.MaxwellM.JepsonR.DuncanE.TurleyR.JonesD.UnyI. (2015). Protocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0068-0
22.
FranceE. F.UnyI.RingN.TurleyR. LMaxwellM.DuncanE. A. S.JepsonR. G.RobertsR. J.NoyesJ. (2019). A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7
23.
GergenK. J.JosselsonR.FreemanM. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. The American Psychologist, 70, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038597
24.
GordonJ. R.BaikS. H.SchwartzK. T. G.WellsK. J. (2019). Comparing the mental health of sexual minority and heterosexual cancer survivors: A systematic review. LGBT Health, 6(6), 271–288. https://10.1089/lgbt.2018.0204
25.
GriggsJ.MaingiS.BlinderV.DenduluriN.KhoranaA. A.NortonL.FranciscoM.WollinsD. S.RowlandJ. H. (2017). American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement: Strategies for reducing cancer health disparities among sexual and gender minority populations. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(19), 2203–2208, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0441
26.
HildebrandtC.MayerH.KollerA. (2019). Experiences of patients with colorectal cancer from diagnosis until completion of treatment: A meta-ethnography approach. Psycho-Oncology, 28(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4946
27.
KamenC.JabsonJ. M.MustianK. M.BoehmerU. (2017). Minority stress, psychosocial resources, and psychological distress among sexual minority breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology, 36(6), 529–537. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/hea0000465
28.
KamenC. S.AlpertA.MargoliesL.GriggsJ. J.DarbesL.Smith-StonerM.LytleM.PoteatT.ScoutN.NortonS. A. (2019). “Treat us with dignity”: A qualitative study of the experiences and recommendations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) patients with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(7), 2525–2532. http://dx.doi.org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4535-0
LegereL. E.MacDonnellJ. A. (2016). Meaningful support for lesbian and bisexual women navigating reproductive cancer care in Canada: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1177174498716640582
31.
LisyK.PetersM. D. J.SchofieldP.JeffordM. (2018). Experiences and unmet needs of lesbian, gay and bisexual people with cancer care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Psycho-Oncology, 27(6), 1480–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4674
32.
MargoliesL.KamenC. (2015). Needs of LGBT cancer survivors. In BoehmerU.ElkR. (Eds.), Cancer and the LGBT community. Springer International Publishing.
33.
MatthewsA. K. (1998). Lesbians and cancer support: Clinical issues for cancer patients. Health Care of Women International, 19(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/073993398246368
34.
MatthewsA. K.PetermanA. H.DelaneyP.MenardL.BrandenburgD. (2002). A qualitative exploration of the experiences of lesbian and heterosexual patients with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29(10), 1455–1462, https://doi.org/10.1188/02.ONF.1455-1462
35.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
36.
NoblitG.HareR. (1998). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage Publications Inc.
37.
PaulL. B.PitagoraD.BrownB.TworeckeA.RubinL. (2014). Support needs and resources of sexual minority women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 23(5), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3451
38.
QuinnG. P.SanchezJ. A.SuttonS. K.VadaparampilS. T.NguyenG. T.GreenB. L.KanetskyP. A.SchabathM. B. (2015). Cancer and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 65(5), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21288
39.
SealeC. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage
40.
SindingC.BarnoffL.GrassauP. (2004). Homophobia and heterosexism in cancer care: The experiences of lesbians. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36(4), 170–188.
41.
ToyeF.SeersK.AllcockN.BriggsM.CarrE.BarkerK. (2014). Metaethnography 25 years on: Challenges and insights for synthesizing a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 80, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
ValentiK. G.JanssenL. M.EnguidanosS.de MedeirosK. (2021). We speak a different language: End-of-life and bereavement experiences of older lesbian, gay, and bisexual women who have lost a spouse or partner. Qualitative Health Research, 31(9), 1670–1679. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211002823
44.
UlinP. R.RobinsonE. T.TolleE. E. (2005). Qualitative data analysis. In Qualitative methods in public health: A field guide for applied research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, (pp. 139–154)
45.
WakefieldD. (2021). Cancer care disparities in the LGBT community. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 15 (3), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000557
46.
WandreyR. L.QuallsW. D.MosackK. E. (2016). Rejection of breast reconstruction among lesbian breast cancer patients. LGBT Health, 3(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0091
47.
WeedM. (2005). Interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.508
48.
WhiteJ. L.BoehmerU. (2012). Long-term breast cancer survivors’ perceptions of support from female partners: An exploratory study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.ONF.210-217
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
