Attitudes Toward Peer-Delivered Sexual-Health Services Among New York City Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Who Have Sex with Men and Attend Collective Sex Venues
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2022
Attitudes Toward Peer-Delivered Sexual-Health Services Among New York City Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Who Have Sex with Men and Attend Collective Sex Venues
Collective sex venues such as sex clubs are strategic sites to promote sexual health among sexual and gender minority individuals. We present qualitative findings from a multiple-method study on the acceptability of sexual-health services at collective sex venues in New York City (NYC) among attendees who identified as men, transgender, or gender non-conforming. In a survey used for sample selection (n = 342), most respondents (82.7%) agreed that “having outreach workers at sex venues is a good thing.” Interviewees (n = 30) appreciated how on-site services could promote sexual health in their community. They felt peer workers should be familiar with collective sex venues and share demographic characteristics with attendees. Some participants felt workers should keep some boundaries from attendees, while others felt they could be fully integrated in the environment, suggesting that either peer outreach or popular-opinion leader types of interventions could be feasible.
BellS.AggletonP.LockyerA.FergusonT.MurrayW.SilverB.KaldorJ.MaherL.WardJ. (2021). Working with aboriginal young people in sexual health research: A peer research methodology in remote Australia. Qualitative Health Research, 31(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320961348
2.
BlotcherJ. (1996). Sex club owners. In ColterE. G.HoffmanW.PendletonE.RedickA.SerlinD. (Eds.), Policing public sex: Queer politics and the future of AIDS activism (pp. 25–44). South End Press.
3.
CallonC.CharlesG.AlexanderR.SmallW.KerrT. (2013). ‘On the same level’: Facilitators’ experiences running a drug user-led safer injecting education campaign. Harm Reduction Journal, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-10-4
CortopassiA. C.DriverR.EatonL. A.KalichmanS. C. (2019). A new era of HIV risk: It’s not what you know, it’s who you know (and how infectious). Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 673–701. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102927
7.
DaskalakisD.SilveraR.BernsteinK.SteinD.HagertyR.HuttR.MaillardA.BorkowskyW.AbergJ.ValentineF.MarmorM. (2009). Implementation of HIV testing at 2 New York City bathhouses: from pilot to clinical service. Clin Infect Dis, 48(11), 1609–16. https://doi.org/10.1086/59897919400690
8.
DebattistaJ. (2015). Health promotion within a sex on premises venue: Notes from the field. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 26(14), 1017–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462414568395
9.
ElfordJ.BoldingG.SherrL. (2001). Peer education has no significant impact on HIV risk behaviours among gay men in London. [Letter]. AIDS, 15(4), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200103090-00018
10.
ElfordJ.SherrL.BoldingG.SerleF.MaguireM. (2002). Peer-led HIV prevention among gay men in London: Process evaluation. AIDS Care, 14(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120220123739
11.
FlowersP.HartG. J.WilliamsonL. M.FrankisJ. S.DerG. J. (2002). Does bar-based, peer-led sexual health promotion have a community-level effect amongst gay men in Scotland?International Journal of STD & AIDS, 13(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1258/0956462021924721
12.
FrankK. (2019). Rethinking risk, culture, and intervention in collective sex environments. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1153-3
13.
GallagherT.LinkL.RamosM.BottgerE.AbergJ.DaskalakisD. (2014). Self-perception of HIV risk and candidacy for pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men testing for HIV at commercial sex venues in New York City. LGBT Health, 1(3), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2013.0046
14.
GrovC.CruzJ.ParsonsJ. T. (2014a). Men who have sex with men’s attitudes toward using color-coded wristbands to facilitate sexual communication at sex parties. Sex Res Social Policy, 11(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0145-x24659929
15.
GrovCRendinaH. J.BreslowA. S.VentuneacA.AdelsonS.ParsonsJ. T. (2014b). Characteristics of men who have sex with men (MSM) who attend sex parties: results from a national online sample in the USA. Sex Transm Infect, 90(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-05109424052337
16.
GrovC.RendinaH. J.VentuneacA.ParsonsJ. T. (2014c). Partners met via sex parties present significantly greater odds for condomless anal sex among MSM: an event-level analysis of venues where male partners are met. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 67(5), 564–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.000000000000034325226209
17.
HirshfieldS.SchrimshawE. W.StallR. D.MargolisA. D.DowningM. J.ChiassonM. A. (2015). Drug use, sexual risk, and syndemic production among men Who have sex with men who engage in group sexual encounters. American Journal of Public Health, 105(9), 1849–1858. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302346
18.
HudsonK. D.RomanelliM. (2020). We are powerful people”: Health-promoting strengths of LGBTQ communities of color. Qualitative Health Research, 30(8), 1156–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319837572
19.
HuebnerD. M.BinsonD.PollackL. M.WoodsW. J. (2012). Implementing bathhouse-based voluntary counselling and testing has no adverse effect on bathhouse patronage among men who have sex with men. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 23(3), 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1258/ijsa.2009.009318
20.
KellyJ. A.MurphyD. A.SikkemaK. J.McAuliffeT. L.RoffmanR. A.SolomonL. J.WinettR. A.KalichmanS. C. (1997). Randomised, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. Community HIV prevention research collaborative. Lancet (London, England), 350(9090), 1500–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07439-4
21.
KlassenB. J.LachowskyN. J.LinS. Y.EdwardJ. B.ChownS. A.HoggR. S.MooreD. M.RothE. A. (2017). Gay men’s understanding and education of new HIV prevention technologies in Vancouver, Canada. Qualitative Health Research, 27(12), 1775–1791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317716419
22.
KramerS. C.SchmidtA. J.BergR. C.FuregatoM.HospersH.FolchC.MarcusU.EMIS Network (2016). Factors associated with unprotected anal sex with multiple non-steady partners in the past 12 months: Results from the European men-who-have-sex-with-men internet survey (EMIS 2010). BMC Public Health, 16(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2691-z
23.
LeitingerD.RyanK. E.BrownG.PedranaA.WilkinsonA. L.RyanC.HellardM.StoovéM. (2018). Acceptability and HIV prevention benefits of a peer-based model of rapid point of care HIV testing for Australian gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 22(1), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1888-1
24.
MacQueenK. M.McLellanE.KayK.MilsteinB. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. CAM Journal, 10(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X980100020301
25.
MarshallZ.DechmanM. K.MinichielloA.AlcockL.HarrisG. E. (2015). Peering into the literature: A systematic review of the roles of people who inject drugs in harm reduction initiatives. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 151, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.002
26.
MedleyA.KennedyC.O’ReillyK.SweatM. (2009). Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21(3), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.181
27.
MeunierÉ. (2014). No attitude, no standing around: the organization of social and sexual interaction at a gay male private sex party in New York city. Arch Sex Behav, 43(4), 685–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0182-123979786
28.
MeunierÉEscoffierJ. (2021). The Triumph of Collective Intimacy—Gay Collective Sex in New York City from the Late 1800s to Today. In ConnerChristopher T.OkamuraDaniel (Eds.), The Gayborhood: From Sexual Liberation to Cosmopolitan Spectacle (pp. 85–106). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
29.
MeunierÉEscoffierJSiegelK. (2019). Rethinking Risks and Interventions Beyond HIV: The Importance of Contextualizing Collective Sex. Arch Sex Behav, 48(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1214-729663163
30.
MeunierÉSiegelK. (2019). Sex club/party attendance and STI among men who have sex with men: results from an online survey in New York City. Sex Transm Infect, 95(8), 584–587. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-05381630867250
31.
MillerR. L.KlotzD.EckholdtH. M. (1998). HIV prevention with male prostitutes and patrons of hustler bars: Replication of an HIV preventive intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(1), 97–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021886208524
32.
MimiagaM. J.ReisnerS. L.BlandS.CranstonK.IsenbergD.DriscollM. A.VanDerwarkerR.MayerK. H. (2010). It’s a quick way to get what you want”: A formative exploration of HIV risk among urban Massachusetts men who have sex with men who attend sex parties. AIDS Patient Care & STDs, 24(10), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2010.0071
33.
MolinaJ.-M.CapitantC.SpireB.PialouxG.CotteL.CharreauI.TremblayC.Le GallJ.-M.CuaE.PasquetA.RaffiF.PintadoC.ChidiacC.ChasJ.CharbonneauP.DelaugerreC.Suzan-MontiM.LozeB.FonsartJ.ANRS IPERGAY Study Group (2015). On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(23), 2237–2246. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506273
34.
MolinaJ.-M.CharreauI.ChidiacC.PialouxG.CuaE.DelaugerreC.CapitantC.Rojas-CastroD.FonsartJ.BercotB.BébéarC.CotteL.RobineauO.RaffiF.CharbonneauP.AslanA.ChasJ.NiedbalskiL.SpireB.ANRS IPERGAY Study Group (2018). Post-exposure prophylaxis with doxycycline to prevent sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men: An open-label randomised substudy of the ANRS IPERGAY trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 18(3), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30725-9
MullensA. B.DakenK.LemoireJ.BrownlowC.DriverG.GowJ. (2020). HIV Point of Care Testing (PoCT) at late-night Sex on Premises Venues (SOPV) for Gay and Bisexual Men and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (GBMSM): A mixed methods analysis. AIDS and Behavior, 24(2), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02500-0
38.
NyamathiA. M.WallS. A.YadavK.ShinS. S.ChangA.ArceN.CuellarH.FernandoS.WhiteK.GelbergL.SalemB. E. (2021). Engaging the community in designing a hepatitis C virus treatment program for adults experiencing homelessness. Qualitative Health Research, 31(11), 2069–2083. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211021782
39.
PhillipsG.GrovC.MustanskiB. (2015). Engagement in group sex among geosocial networking mobile application-using men who have sex with men. Sex Health, 12(6), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH1510826255156
40.
PhillipsG.MagnusM.KuoI.RawlsA.PetersonJ.West-OjoT.JiaY.OpokuJ.GreenbergA. E. (2014). Correlates of group sex among a community-based sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington, DC. AIDS and Behavior, 18(8), 1413–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0527-8
41.
PrestageG.DownI.GrulichA.ZablotskaI. (2011). Sex partying among gay men in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, Australia. AIDS and Behavior, 15(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9824-7
42.
ReisnerS. L.MimiagaM. J.SkeerM.VanDerwarkerR.GaucherM. J.O’ConnorC. A.MedeirosM. S.SafrenS. A. (2009). Differential HIV risk behavior among men who have sex with men seeking health-related mobile van services at diverse gay-specific venues. AIDS and Behavior, 13(4), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9430-0
43.
RiceC. E.LynchC. D.NorrisA. H.DavisJ. A.FieldsK. S.ErvinM.TurnerA. N. (2016a). Group sex and prevalent sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(6), 1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0554-9
44.
RiceC. E.MaierhoferC.FieldsK. S.ErvinM.LanzaS. T.TurnerA. N. (2016b). Beyond anal sex: Sexual practices of men who have sex with men and associations with HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.001
45.
RichA. J.LachowskyN. J.CuiZ.SeredaP.LalA.BirchR.MontanerJ.MooreD.HoggR. S.RothE. A. (2016). Substance use, sexual behaviour and prevention strategies of Vancouver gay and bisexual men who recently attended group sex events. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1084649
46.
SafrenS. A.O’CleirighC.SkeerM. R.DriskellJ.GosheB. M.CovaheyC.MayerK. H. (2011). Demonstration and evaluation of a peer-delivered, individually-tailored, HIV prevention intervention for HIV-infected MSM in their primary care setting. AIDS and Behavior, 15(5), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9807-8
ShanganiS.EscuderoD.KirwaK.HarrisonA.MarshallB.OperarioD. (2017). Effectiveness of peer-led interventions to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Care, 29(8), 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2017.1282105
49.
SimoniJ. M.FranksJ. C.LehavotK.YardS. S. (2011a). Peer interventions to promote health: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01103.x
50.
SimoniJ. M.NelsonK. M.FranksJ. C.YardS. S.LehavotK. (2011b). Are peer interventions for HIV efficacious? A systematic review. AIDS and Behavior, 15(8), 1589–1595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9963-5
51.
SmithA. M. A.GriersonJ. W.von DoussaH. (2010a). Gay men’s sex venues, the men who use them, and gay community perceptions: Insights from a convenience sample of gay men attending a community festival in Melbourne. Sexual Health, 7(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09055
52.
SmithA. M. A.GriersonJ. W.von DoussaH. (2010b). Understanding gay men’s sex venues as sites for sexual health promotion. Sexual Health, 7(2), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09050
53.
SolomonT. M.HalkitisP. N.MoellerR. M.SiconolfiD. E.KiangM. V.BartonS. C. (2011). Sex parties among young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in New York City: Attendance and behavior. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 88(6), 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9590-5
54.
StrömdahlS.HoijerJ.EriksenJ. (2019). Uptake of peer-led venue-based HIV testing sites in Sweden aimed at men who have sex with men (MSM) and trans persons: A cross-sectional survey. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 95(8), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054007
WohlfeilerD.PotteratJ. J. (2005). Using gay men’s sexual networks to reduce sexually transmitted disease (STD)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32(10 Suppl), S48–S52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000175394.81945.68
58.
WoodsW. J.ErwinK.LazarusM.SericeH.GrinsteadO.BinsonD. (2008). Building stakeholder partnerships for an on-site HIV testing programme. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 10(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050701793806
59.
WoodsW. J.EurenJ.PollackL. M.BinsonD. (2010). HIV prevention in gay bathhouses and sex clubs across the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 55(Suppl 2), S88–S90. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fbca1b
60.
WoodsW. J.SabatinoJ.BauerP. L.AdlerB.DilleyJ. W.BinsonD. (2000). HIV testing in gay sex clubs. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 11(3), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1258/0956462001915633
61.
WoodsW. J.SheonN.MorrisJ. A.BinsonD. (2013). Gay bathhouse HIV prevention: The use of staff monitoring of patron sexual behavior. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0112-y
62.
YeS.YinL.AmicoR.SimoniJ.VermundS.RuanY.ShaoY.QianH.-Z. (2014). Efficacy of peer-led interventions to reduce unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis. Plos One, 9(3), Article e90788. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090788
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
