The management of uncertainty is integral to health and illness. Individuals manage uncertainty about their health through communication enmeshed in family systems, but existing theorizing focuses on individuals without accounting for family processes. An iterative qualitative analysis of 42 dyadic, family interviews (N = 84) revealed (a) moments in the context of hereditary cancer that involved individual-centered and familial uncertainty appraisal and management, (b) family members’ communication strategies to prompt relatives to engage familial uncertainty, and (c) the communicative (re)creation and negotiation of family models for uncertainty management. The findings illuminate tensions that individuals encounter across their lifespan as they appraise and manage uncertainty about hereditary cancer risks. This study extends uncertainty management theory to encompass familial uncertainty management and contributes insights useful for the management of hereditary cancer.
BabrowA. S.KlineK. N. (2000). From “reducing” to “coping with” uncertainty: Reconceptualizing the central challenge in breast self-exams. Social Science & Medicine, 51(12), 1805–1816. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00112-x
2.
BabrowA. S.MatthiasM. S. (2009). Generally unseen challenges in uncertainty management: An application of problematic integration theory. In AfifiT. D. A. W. A. (Ed.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and Applications (pp. 9–25). Routledge.
3.
Baiocchi-WagnerE. A.TalleyA. E. (2013). The role of family communication in individual health attitudes and behaviors concerning diet and physical activity. Health Communication, 28(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.674911
4.
BaxterL. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Sage Publications.
5.
BowenG. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
BrashersD. E. (2007). A theory of communication and uncertainty management. Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 201–218).
8.
BrashersD. E.NeidigJ. L.GoldsmithD. J. (2004). Social support and the management of uncertainty for people living with HIV or AIDS. Health Communication, 16(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1603_3
9.
BylundC. L.FisherC. L.BrashersD.EdgersonS.GlogowskiE. A.BoyarS. R.. . .KemelY.SpencerS.KissaneD. (2012). Sources of uncertainty about daughters’ breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9400-y
10.
BylundC. L.GalvinK. M.GaffC. L. (2010). Principles of family communication. In BylundC. L. G. C. L. (Ed.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 3–17). Oxford University Press.
11.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.
12.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
13.
DeanM.FisherC. L. (2019). Uncertainty and previvors’ cancer risk management: understanding the decision-making process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47(4), 460–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1657236
14.
DeanMRauscherEA (2018). Men’s and women’s approaches to disclosure about BRCA-related cancer risks and family planning decision-making. Qualitative Health Research, 28(14), 2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318788377
15.
Donovan-KickenE.CaughlinJ. P. (2011). Breast cancer patients’ topic avoidance and psychological distress: The mediating role of coping. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(4), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310383605
16.
Donovan-KickenE.TollisonA. C.GoinsE. S. (2012). The nature of communication work during cancer: Advancing the theory of illness trajectories. Health Communication, 27(7), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.629405
17.
Dorrance HallE.MaM.AzimovaD.CampbellN.EllithorpeM.PlasenciaJ.ChavezM.ZeldesG. A.TakahashiB.BleakleyA.HennessyM. (2021). The Mediating role of family and cultural food beliefs on the relationship between family communication patterns and diet and health issues across racial/ethnic groups. Health Communication, 36(5), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1733213
18.
EllingsonL. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Sage.
19.
FisherC. (2011). Her pain was my pain”: Mothers and daughters sharing the breast cancer journey. In Family communication, connections, and health transitions(pp. 56–76).
20.
FisherC. L.MaloneyE.GlogowskiE.HurleyK.EdgersonS.LichtenthalW. G.KissaneD.BylundC. (2014). Talking about familial breast cancer risk: Topics and strategies to enhance mother-daughter interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314524638
21.
FisherC. L.WrightK. B.HamptonC. N.VasquezT. S.KastrinosA.ApplebaumA. J.Sae-HauM.WeissE. S.LincolnG.BylundC. L. (2021). Blood cancer caregiving during COVID-19: Understanding caregivers’ needs. Transl Behav Med, 11(5), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab021
22.
GalvinK. M.DicksonF. C.MarrowS. R. (2006). Systems theory: Patterns and (W) holes in family communication. In Engaging theories in family communication—multiple perspectives engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 309–324). Sage Publications, Inc.
23.
GalvinK. M.YoungM.-A. (2010). Family systems theory. Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 102–119).
24.
GibbsG. R. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data (Vol. 6). Sage.
25.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
26.
HanP. K. J.BabrowA.HillenM. A.GulbrandsenP.SmetsE. M.OfstadE. H. (2019). Uncertainty in health care: Towards a more systematic program of research. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(10), 1756–1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.012
27.
Hesse-BiberS. (2014). The Genetic Testing Experience of BRCA-Positive Women: Deciding Between Surveillance and Surgery. Qualitative Health Research, 24(6), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314529666
28.
HoganT. P.BrashersD. E. (2009). The theory of communication and uncertainty management: Implications from the wider realm of information behavior. In AfifiT. D.AfifiW. A. (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions (pp. 45–66). Routledge.
29.
IdosG.ValleL. (2021). Lynch syndrome.
30.
JonesD. J.BeachS. R. H.JacksonH. (2004). Family influences on health: A framework to organize research and guide intervention. In VangelistiA. L. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 647–672). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
KashianN.MirzaeiT. (2019). Understanding communication effectiveness, communication satisfaction, self-efficacy, and self-care management among patients with chronic disease. Science Communication, 41(2), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019834566
32.
KnoblochL. K.SharabiL. L.DelaneyA. L.SuranneS. M. (2016). The role of relational uncertainty in topic avoidance among couples with depression. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.998691
33.
KuangK.WilsonS. R. (2017). A meta-analysis of uncertainty and information management in illness contexts. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12299
34.
LawW. K.YaremychH. E.FerrerR. A.RichardsonE.WuY. P.TurbittE. (2021). Decision-making about genetic health information among family dyads: A systematic literature review. Health Psychology Review, ■■■(■■■)1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1980083
35.
LecarpentierJ.SilvestriV.KuchenbaeckerK. B.BarrowdaleD.DennisJ.McGuffogL.SoucyP.LeslieG.RizzoloP.NavazioA. S.ValentiniV.ZelliV.LeeA.Amin Al OlamaA.TyrerJ. P.SoutheyM.JohnE. M.ConnerT. A.GoldgarD. E.OttiniL. (2017). Prediction of breast and prostate cancer risks in male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers using polygenic risk scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(20), 2240–2250. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4935
36.
LeeS. Y.HwangH.HawkinsR.PingreeS. (2008). Interplay of negative emotion and health self-efficacy on the use of health information and its outcomes. Communication Research, 35(3), 358–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315962
37.
LindorN. M.PetersenG. M.HadleyD. W.KinneyA. Y.MiesfeldtS.LuK. H.LynchP.BurkeW.PressN. (2006). Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: A systematic review. JAMA, 296(12), 1507–1517. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.12.1507
38.
MendesÁ.MetcalfeA.PanequeM.SousaL.ClarkeA. J.SequeirosJ. (2018). Communication of information about genetic risks: Putting families at the center. Family Process, 57(3), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12306
39.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
40.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldaňaJ. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
NielsenF. C.van Overeem HansenT.SørensenC. S. (2016). Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: New genes in confined pathways. Nature Reviews Cancer, 16(9), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.72
44.
PittsM. J.FowlerC.KaplanM. S.NussbaumJ.BeckerJ. C. (2009). Dialectical tensions underpinning family farm succession planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802592631
45.
RauscherE. A.HesseC.MillerS.FordW.YoungsE. L. (2015). Privacy and family communication about genetic cancer risk: Investigating factors promoting women’s disclosure decisions. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1076423
46.
RauscherE. A.YoungS. L.DurhamW. T.BarbourJ. B. (2017). I’d know that my child was out there: Egg donation, the institutionalized “ideal” family, and health care decision making. Health Communication, 32(5), 550–559.
47.
RauscherE. A.DeanM.Campbell-SalomeG.BarbourJ. B. (2019). How do we rally around the one who was positive? Familial uncertainty management in the context of men managing BRCA-related cancer risks. Social Science Medicine, 242, 112592.
48.
SolomonD. H.BrinbergM.BodieG. D.JonesS.RamN. (2021). A dynamic dyadic systems approach to interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 1001–1026.
49.
ScherrC. L.DeanM.ClaytonM. F.HesseB. W.SilkK.StreetR. L.JrKriegerJ. (2017). A research agenda for communication scholars in the precision medicine era. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1363324
50.
ScottA. M.CaughlinJ. P. (2012). Managing multiple goals in family discourse about end-of-life health decisions. Research on Aging, 34(6), 670–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027512446942
51.
ScottA. M.MartinS. C.StoneA. M.BrashersD. E. (2011). Managing multiple goals in supportive interactions: Using a normative theoretical approach to explain social support as uncertainty management for organ transplant patients. Health Communication, 26(5), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.552479
52.
SolomonD. H.BrinbergM.BodieG. D.JonesS.RamN. (2021). A dynamic dyadic systems approach to interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 1001–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab035
53.
TracyS. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.
WhitakerK. D.ObeidE.DalyM. B.HallM. J. (2021). Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk: An Underutilized Tool for Cancer Prevention. JCO Precision Oncology, 5, 1387–1396. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.21.00163
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
